The review of the first 325 Exeter Universal hips reported good long term survivorship despite the majority of cups being metal backed. We have reviewed the long term performance of the concentric all-polyethylene Exeter cups used with the Universal Exeter stem.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of 263 consecutive primary hip arthroplasties in 242 patients with mean age 66 years (range, 18 to 89) were reviewed. 118 cases subsequently died none of whom underwent a revision. Eighteen hips have been revised; thirteen for aseptic cup loosening, three for recurrent dislocation and two for deep infection. Three patients (four hips) were lost to follow-up. The minimum follow-up of the remaining 123 hips was 10 years (mean 13.3 years, range 10–17). Radiographs demonstrated 6 (6%) of the remaining acetabular prostheses were loose. The Kaplan Meier survivorship at 14.5 years with endpoint revision for all causes is 91.5% (95% CI 86.6 to 96.2%). With endpoint revision for aseptic cup loosening, survivorship is 93.3% (CI 88.8 to 97.8%).

This series included a number of complex cases requiring bone blocks and/or chip autograft for acetabular deficiencies. The concentric all polythene Exeter cup and Exeter stem has excellent long term results particularly when factoring in the complexity of cases in this series.

Purpose: There is evidence that recommends the retention of a well-fixed cement mantle at the time of revision hip arthroplasty. The cement-cement interface has been proven to have a greater shear strength than a new bone-cement interface after removing the old cement mantle.

Method: This study reviewed a series of acetabular revision procedures with a minimum 2-year follow-up where the original cement mantle was left intact. From 1988 to 2004, 63 consecutive cement-in-cement revisions of the acetabular component were performed at our institution. Outcome was based on functional assessment using the Oxford, Charnley, and Harris scoring systems as well as radiographic analysis using the DeLee and Charnley criteria.

Results: In total 63 procedures were performed in 61 patients (40 female and 21 male), whose mean age at surgery was 74 years (range 40 to 99 years). 47 hips (75%) were performed for recurrent dislocation, 13 for aseptic loosening, 1 for pain, 1 for excessive shortening, and 1 for disarticulation of a constrained liner. No case was lost to follow-up. There was a significant improvement in the functional scores from the pre-operative status with the patients maintaining a low level of pain. There was one re-revision for aseptic cup loosening at 7 years, with 1 further case of radiological loosening identified at the latest review. There were 6 further cases of dislocation 5 of which were treated with further in-cement revisions. All other cases showed well-fixed components on radiographic analysis and no evidence of failure at the most recent follow up.

Conclusion: The cement-in-cement revision technique can be used in selected cases of acetabular revision surgery, providing satisfactory functional outcomes backed up by good radiographic results. Blood loss and surgical time are also significantly decreased.

Introduction: Recurrent dislocation can be a significant problem after total hip replacement. The use of a constrained tripolar liner is an option in the surgical treatment of dislocation or instability.

Methods: A retrospective review was carried out of patients identified from a prospective database. All patients had a constrained liner cemented onto a satisfactory pre-existing cement mantle, cemented into a reconstruction ring, or cemented into a well fixed cementless shell. The Osteonics Tripolar Liner was used in all cases; the outer aspect of the liner was prepared with a burr to create grooves and thus improve cement interlock. Data collected included demographics, reason for revision, re-revision rate, outcome and survival.

Results: There were 58 cases identified where a cemented constrained liner was inserted at revision hip surgery. Average age at time of surgery was 77years (range 40–94). There were 9 patients who died with less than 2 years follow-up; they were excluded, leaving a study group of 49 cases. No cases were lost to follow-up. Average duration of follow-up was 46months (range 24–76). There have been 4 infections, one of which required removal of prostheses and a 2-stage revision. There was one case of fall post-operatively and fracture of the contra-lateral femoral neck. There have been 4 implant failures requiring re-revision. All failures were due to disarticulation of the liner, 2 of which occurred in the same patient on separate occasions. There have been no revisions for loosening, and there have been no cases of failure at the bone-cement interface or at the cement-cement interface with the cement-in-cement technique. Overall survival of the cemented constrained liner was 90% at average 3.8years.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that cementing a constrained liner into the acetabulum is a viable option in revision hip surgery, particularly in the management of instability.