header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_17 | Pages 13 - 13
24 Nov 2023
Sliepen J Hoekstra H Onsea J Bessems L Depypere M Herteleer M Sermon A Nijs S Vranckx J Metsemakers W
Full Access

Aim

The number of operatively treated clavicle fractures has increased over the past decades. Consequently, this has led to an increase in secondary procedures required to treat complications such as fracture-related infection (FRI). The primary objective of this study was to assess the clinical and functional outcome of patients treated for FRI of the clavicle. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the healthcare costs and propose a standardized protocol for the surgical management of this complication.

Method

All patients with a clavicle fracture who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) between 1 January 2015 and 1 March 2022 were retrospectively evaluated.

This study included patients with an FRI who were diagnosed and treated according to the recommendations of a multidisciplinary team at the University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 73 - 73
1 Apr 2018
Vancleef S Herteleer M Herijgers P Nijs S Jonkers I Vander Sloten J
Full Access

Last decade, a shift towards operative treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures has been observed [T. Huttunen et al., Injury, 2013]. Current fracture fixation plates are however suboptimal, leading to reoperation rates up to 53% [J. G. Wijdicks et al., Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg, 2012]. Plate irritation, potentially caused by a bad geometric fit and plate prominence, has been found to be the most important factor for reoperation [B. D. Ashman et a.l, Injury, 2014]. Therefore, thin plate implants that do not interfere with muscle attachment sites (MAS) would be beneficial in reducing plate irritation. However, little is known about the clavicle MAS variation. The goal of this study was therefore to assess their variability by morphing the MAS to an average clavicle.

14 Cadaveric clavicles were dissected by a medical doctor (MH), laser scanned (Nikon, LC60dx) and a photogrammetry was created with Agisoft photoscan (Agisoft, Russia). Subsequently a CT-scan of these bones was acquired and segmented in Mimics (Materialise, Belgium). The segmented bone was aligned with the laser scan and MAS were indicated in 3-matic (Materialise, Belgium). Next, a statistical shape model (SSM) of the 14 segmented clavicles was created. The average clavicle from the SSM was then registered to all original clavicle meshes. This registration assures correspondences between source and target mesh. Hence, MAS of individual muscles of all 14 bones were indicated on the average clavicle.

Mean area is 602 mm2 ± 137 mm2 for the deltoid muscle, 1022 mm2 ±207 mm2 for the trapezius muscle, and 683 mm2 ± 132 mm2 for the pectoralis major muscle. The sternocleidomastoid muscle has a mean area of 513 mm2 ± 190 mm2 and the subclavius muscle had the smallest mean area of 451 mm2 ± 162 mm2. Visualization of all MAS on the average clavicle resulted in 72% coverage of the surface, visualizing only each muscle's largest MAS led to 52% coverage.

The large differences in MAS surface areas, as shown by the standard deviation, already indicate their variability. Difference between coverage by all MAS and only the largest, shows that MAS location varies strongly as well. Therefore, design of generic plates that do not interfere with individual MAS is challenging. Hence, patient-specific clavicle fracture fixation plates should be considered to minimally interfere with MAS.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 53 - 53
1 Apr 2018
Herteleer M Quintens L Carrette Y Vancleef S Vander Sloten J Hoekstra H
Full Access

Purpose

Addressing posterior tibial plateau fractures is increasingly recognized as an important prognostic factor for functional outcome. The treatment of posterior tibial plateau fractures is rather demanding and the implants are still standard, off-the-shelf implants. This emphasizes the need for a more thorough morphological study of the posterior tibial plateau, in order to treat these posterior fractures more adequately. We aimed to demonstrate anatomical variations of the tibia in order to develop better implants.

Method

After approval of the ethical committee 22 historically available CT scans of intact left tibia”s were segmented using Mimics (Materialise, Belgium). In order to perform principal component analysis, corresponding meshes are necessary. Mesh correspondence was achieved by deforming one selected source tibia to every other target tibia, through non rigid registration. The non-rigid registration algorithm was based on the algorithm described by Amberg et al (ref). After performing the non-rigid registration, principal component analysis was performed in Matlab (Mathworks, USA).