Computer Tomography (CT) imaging has been limited to beam hardening artefacts until now. Literature has failed to describe sensitivity and specifity for loosening of endoprothesis in CTs, as metal artefacts have always influenced the diagnostic value of CTs. In recent years a new technology has been developed, the Dual Energy CT. Dual Energy CT scanners simultaneously scan with two tubes at different energy levels, most commonly 100kVp and 140kVp. Furthermore pictures gained from Dual Energy CTs are post-processed with monoenergetic reconstruction, which increases picture quality while further reducing metal artefacts. This promising technology has increased the diagnostic value preventing more radiation for the patients, for example in detection of kidney stones or to map lung perfusion. In the musculoskeletal imaging it has not been established yet and further clinical investigations are necessary. Thus the aim of this study is to describe sensitivity and sensibility for endoprothesis loosening of this novel technology. 53 prospective patients (31 total hip- and 22 total knee-arthoplasties) who were planned for revision surgery underwent preoperative Dual Energy CT examination. All scans were performed with a second-generation, dual-energy multi-detector CT scanner. And all pictures were post-processed with monoenergetic reconstruction. Radiologists were blinded for patient´s history. Senior consultants, who are specialized in arthroplasty of the hip and the knee, performed surgery. Intraoperative information was used as gold standard.Introduction
Material and Methods
Triangular fibrocartilaginous complex (TFCC) tears are common sources of ulna sided wrist pain and resultant functional disability. Diagnosis is based on history, clinical examination and radiological evidence of a TFCC central perforation or radial/ulna tear. The purpose of this study is therefore to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Magnetic Resonance Arthrography (MRA) in the detection of TFCC injury in the adult population. Published and unpublished literature databases were systematically review independently by two researchers. Two-by-two tables were constructed to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of MRI or MRA investigations against arthroscopic outcomes. Pooled sensitivity and specificity values and summary Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (sROC) evaluations were performed. Methodological quality of each study was assessed using the QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) tool.Background and Objectives
Methods
