High-energy pelvic fractures are life-threatening injuries. Approximately 15% to 30% of patients with high-energy pelvic injuries are hemodynamic unstable, hemorrhagic shock remains the main cause of death in patients with pelvic fractures, with an overall mortality rate from 6% to 35%. The correlation between fracture pattern and mortality in polytrauma with pelvic fracture has been previously investigated. However, the purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the relationship of hemodynamic instability with the pelvic fracture pattern according to different classifications. A retrospective study of high-energy pelvic fractures was performed for consecutive patients admitted to the emergency Level I trauma center in the polytrauma unit of our institution from June 2007 to June 2010. A total of 759 patients polytrauma were attended, whom 100 had a pelvic fracture and were included in our study. Demographic data, mechanism of injury and associated injuries were recorded. The patients were classified as hemodynamic stable or unstable according to the ATLS protocol. The pelvic fracture patterns were divided into stable and unstable according to Young-Burgess and Tile classifications. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the relationship between fracture pattern and hemodynamic stability. Secondary outcomes were obtained: the relationship with TCE and pulmonary injury, usefulness of the external fixation, relationship between fracture pattern and embolization requests. Chi-square test was used for the analysis and OR test.Introduction and objectives
Materials and Methods
The decision to treat surgically involves evaluating the type of fracture, individual factors, the hospital’s possibilities and the surgeon’s experience.
There was one case of intraarticular screw, another with an incarcerated bone fragment and another of sub-capital fracture.
Good reduction improves the functional prognosis. The worst outcomes were in elderly patients. In young patients the outcome was related to the damage to joint cartilage.
The evaluation of the results was based on the IKDC protocol and pre- and post-surgical anterior tibial displacement was evaluated with the radiological Lachman test and Telos® arthrometer.