We investigated the effectiveness of the TriaC™-Brace regarding the primary curve correction in Idiopathic Scoliosis (IS).
At the beginning of the therapy with the new orthesis the Risser sign was 2,68 at an average. The daily wearing time was instructed with 22–23 hours. Lumbar curves showed an average cobb angle of 26,1 degrees (standard deviation=8,6) and thoracic curves of 24,4 degrees (standard deviation=6,5). The radiological assessment of primary curve correction (cobb-angle) was performed 6,2 weeks after the beginning of the therapy (anterior posterior radiograph of the spine in standing position with orthesis). Further radiological controls were performed every six months. We evaluated the wearing time, comfort and leisure activity with a valid scoring system (Quality of Life Profile for Spine Deformities). The overall mean wearing time of the Triac™-Brace was 14,7 months.
A insufficient primary curve correction (defined as <
30% of the initial cobb-angle) was observed in 16 thoracic curves (89%) and in 4 lumbar curves (30%). An increasing correction during the therapy as reported by Veldhuizen (2002) could not be observed. There was a curve progression of at least 5 degrees of the cobb-angle in 4 cases. The evaluation by the scoring system (response in 85%) resulted in a high score for cosmetics (4,2/5) and mobility of the back (4,6/5). The wearing time was reported by 90% of the patients with 22–23h.
Larger studies are necessary to investigate the effectiveness of the orthesis in lumbar curves. The improved wearing comfort and cosmetics are a potential advantages of this new orthesis.
Results: The concentrations of cobalt and chromium ions in the serum amounted on average to 4.75μg/l (standard deviation 2,71) for cobalt and 1.10μg/l (standard deviation 1,24) for chromium. Compared to the control group, both the chromium and cobalt levels in the serum showed significant increases (Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test, p=0.0120). At follow-up the Oswestry Disability Score was on average significantly decreased by 24.4 points (L5/S1) (t-test, p <
0.05) and by 26.8 points (L4-S1)(t-test, p <
0.05). The improved clinical situation is also represented by a significant decrease of the Visual Analog Pain Scale of 42,2points after the follow-up (t-test, p<
0,05).
MIS techniques in hip arthroplasty above all have the objective to shorten the rehabilitation period by suitable preparation. A modified Watson-Jones approach through the muscle interval between the middle gluteus and the tensor muscle of fascia latae via a 6 – 8 cm anterolateral skin incision provides a good overview to the preparation. The risk of damaging the lateral femoral cutaneous muscle is relatively low when a suitable incision technique is employed. The use of special instruments decisively decreases the risk of preparation errors, extension damage of the skin nerve and misimplantation of prosthesis components. Back-positioning of the patient on the operating table has clear advantages compared to lateral positioning. When the stem is prepared the proximal femur can be brought into the surgery area by re-positioning the leg under the contralateral leg without overstretching the leg which in turn might lead to extension damage of the femoral nerve. When the implant is chosen, short stems provide minimum bone loss and the advantage of a varic access to the bone, which makes the preparation substantially easier and additionally spares the soft parts. Straight stem prostheses may also be implanted using this method, however, here the danger of an extension damage of the femoral nerve is given by the hyperextension of the leg during preparation. A further common minimal invasive approach is ventral access between the tensor muscle of fascia latae and the sartorious muscle. Here in particular with muscular patients the danger of damaging the rectus femoris by post-operative bleeding is given. The skin is incised in alignment with the lateral femoral cutaneous muscle, which is to be displayed imperatively to be spared. For stem preparation an even more disadvantageous hyperextension of the leg is required. The two-incision-technique where the straight stem is implanted by a gluteussnip – comparable with femur nailing – only provides a very bad view at the proximal femur. Here there is a greater risk of an unnoticed bone fissure when cement-free pressfit stems are used. The advantage of this technique lies in minor hyperextension of the leg for preparation. Minimal invasive hip arthroplasty provides advantages for the patients above all in the early rehabilitation stage. However, the total concept is to be “minimal invasive” and skin incision, sparing of soft parts, choice of prosthesis and duration of surgery are to be considered.