Clinical success of prostheses in joint arthroplasty is ultimately determined by survivorship and patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to compare (non-inferiority) a new morphometric designed stem for total hip arthroplasty (THA) against an established comparator.

A prospective randomised multi-centre study of 144 primary cementless THA performed by nine experienced orthopaedic surgeons was completed (70 received a fully coated collarless tapered stem and 74 received a morphometric designed proximally coated tapered stem). PROMs and blood serum markers were assessed preoperatively and at intervals up to 2-years postoperatively. In addition, measures of femoral stem fit, fill and subsidence at 2-years post-operatively were measured from radiographs by three observers, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.918. A mixed effects model was employed to compare the two prosthesis over the study period. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Demographics, Dorr types and blood serum markers were similar between groups. Both stems demonstrated a significant improvement in PROMs between the pre- and post-operative measurements, with no difference at any timepoint (p > 0.05). The fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem had a non-significantly higher intra-operative femoral fracture rate (5.8% vs 1.4%, p = 0.24), with all patients treated with cable fixation and partial weight bearing. The mean subsidence at 2-years was 2.5mm +/− 2.3mm for the morphometric stem and 2.4mm +/− 1.8mm for the fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem (p = 0.879). There was one outlier in each group with increased subsidence (fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem 6.9mm, morphometric wedge stem 7.4mm), with both patients reporting thigh pain at 2 years.

When compared with an established stem, the newer designed morphometric wedge stem performed well with comparable radiological and PROM outcomes at 2 year follow up. Continued follow-up is required for long term benchmarking.

Clinical success of prostheses in joint arthroplasty is ultimately determined by survivorship and patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to compare (non-inferiority) a new morphometric designed stem for total hip arthroplasty (THA) against an established comparator.

A prospective randomised multi-centre study of 144 primary cementless THA performed by nine experienced orthopaedic surgeons was completed (70 received a fully coated collarless tapered stem and 70 received a morphometric designed proximally coated tapered stem). PROMs and blood serum markers were assessed preoperatively and at intervals up to 2-years postoperatively. In addition, measures of femoral stem fit, fill and subsidence at 2-years post-operatively were measured from radiographs by three observers, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.918. A mixed effects model was employed to compare the two prostheses over the study period. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Demographics and Dorr types were similar between groups. Both stems demonstrated a significant improvement in PROMs between the pre- and post-operative measurements, with no difference at any timepoint (p > 0.05). The fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem had a non-significantly higher intra-operative femoral fracture rate (5.8% vs 1.4%, p = 0.24), with all patients treated with cable fixation and partial weight bearing. The mean subsidence at 2-years was 2.5mm +/- 2.3mm for the morphometric stem and 2.4mm +/- 1.8mm for the fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem (p = 0.879). There was one outlier in each group with increased subsidence (fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem 6.9mm, morphometric wedge stem 7.4mm), with both patients reporting thigh pain at 2 years.

When compared with an established stem, the newer designed morphometric wedge stem performed well with comparable radiological and PROM outcomes at 2 year follow up. Continued follow-up is required for long term benchmarking.

Introduction Charcot arthropathy is a well recognised complication in denervated synovial joints. This is a late complication of traumatic spinal cord injury that is rarely reported in the literature. Early recognition is important and can be difficult as the clinical presentation can vary from pain, deformity, autonomic dysreflexia and audible noises with motion.

Methods We present 5 cases of Charcot’s arthropathy of the spine in patients with in patients with traumatic paraplegia. All patients had spinal surgery to stabilise the spine shortly after the acute injury.

Results The average time from initial injury to presentation with Charcot’s arthropathy was 27 years (range 10–41). A combination of localised and neuropathic pain was the dominant symptom (4 patients) causing re-presentation, but other symptoms included deformity (1 patient). The level of the initial spinal cord injury was at the thoracolumbar junction patients. The Charcot joint level was usually 1 to 2 segments caudal to the spinal fusion. The features noted on plain radiology were destructive changes of the endplate in 4 patients and deformity in 1. With one exception, all patients went on to have MRI to exclude infection and subsequently all were surgically stabilised. All patients were treated surgically. One had an anterior approach, one had posterior approach and one had staged anterior and posterior approaches. The remaining two had anterior and posterior stabilisation through a lateral extra-cavitary approach.

At an average follow-up of 36 months all patients reported good relief of their symptoms, and had returned to their best function post-injury.

Discussion Surgical stabilisation in this series yielded very good results. We observed a wide variation in presenting symptoms and therefore would indicate that a high index of suspicion is required. We believe that MRI is mandatory to exclude infection and would advocate early stabilisation. The lateral extra-cavitary approach allows posterior and anterior stabilisation in a single procedure and in now the preferred method in our institution. As patients with spinal cord injuries live increasingly active lives, this problem will be seen more frequently.