We present a consecutive series of 19 patients with 22 intra-articular calcaneal fractures treated by percutaneous arthroscopic fixation (percutaneous arthroscopic calcaneal osteosynthesis “PACO”). Traditional open reduction and fixation regularly has significant wound complications. PACO has the advantage of direct visualization of the joint surface reduction with the benefit of minimal soft tissue trauma and wound complications. Between July 2010 & April 2012, 39 isolated closed intra-articular calcaneal fractures were admitted to St Mary's Hospital. All Sanders type 2 and type 3 fractures were included. Undisplaced fractures (13) were treated non-operatively and comminuted type 4 fractures (4) were treated with primary arthroscopic fusion. Surgery was performed on the next list with no delay for swelling. All patients had pre and post op CT scans. Patients were discharged in a temporary cast with routine follow up at 2, 6 and 12 weeks.Introduction
Methods
Computer navigation has the potential to revolutionise orthopaedic surgery. It is widely accepted that component malalignment and malrotation leads to early failure in knee arthroplasty. We aimed to assess the use and reliability of computer navigation in both total (TKR) and unicompartmental (UKR) knee replacement surgery. We analysed 40 consecutive UKRs and 40 consecutive TKRs. All procedures were carried out with the Brain-LAB navigation system and all were carried out by one consultant orthopaedic surgeon. Preoperative aim was neutral tibial cuts with 3 degrees posterior slope. Coronal and sagittal alignment of tibial components were measured on postoperative radiographs. Patients were also scored clinically with regards to function and pain. In the TKR group, mean tibial coronal alignment was 0° (range 1 to −2.) Mean sagittal alignment was 2° posterior slope (range 0 to 4.) In the UKR group, mean tibial coronal alignment was 0.55° (range 0 to −3.) Mean sagittal alignment was 2.1° posterior slope (range 0 to 4°.) Clinical outcome scores were very satisfactory for the majority of patients, with far superior functional scores in the UKR group. Our results demonstrate very accurate placement of the prosthesis in both the TKR and UKR group with computer navigation. There is a very narrow range with no outliers, (all within +/−3 degrees of desired alignment.) Functional outcome scores are good. We advocate the use of computer navigation in unicompartmental as well as total knee replacment surgery, in order to minimise early failures.
