The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the tapered cone stem in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with excessive femoral anteversion and after femoral osteotomy. We included patients who underwent THA using Wagner Cone due to proximal femur anatomical abnormalities between August 2014 and January 2019 at a single institution. We investigated implant survival time using the endpoint of dislocation and revision, and compared the prevalence of prosthetic impingements between the Wagner Cone, a tapered cone stem, and the Taperloc, a tapered wedge stem, through simulation. We also collected Oxford Hip Score (OHS), visual analogue scale (VAS) satisfaction, and VAS pain by postal survey in August 2023 and explored variables associated with those scores.Aims
Methods
Accurate cup placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for the patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is one of the challenges due to distinctive bone deformity. Robotic-arm assisted system have been developed to improve the accuracy of implant placement. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of robotic-arm assisted (Robo-THA), CT-based navigated (Navi-THA), and manual (M-THA) cup position and orientation in THA for DDH. A total of 285 patients (335 hips) including 202 M-THAs, 45 Navi-THAs, and 88 Robo-THA were analyzed. The choice of procedure followed the patient's preferences. Horizontal and vertical center of rotation (HCOR and VCOR) were measured for cup position, and radiographic inclination (RI) and anteversion (RA) were measured for cup orientation. The propensity score-matching was performed among three groups to compare the absolute error from the preoperative target position and angle. Navi-THA showed significantly smaller absolute errors than M-THA in RI (3.6° and 5.4°) and RA (3.8° and 6.0°), however, there were no significant differences between them in HCOR (2.5 mm and 3.0 mm) or VCOR (2.2 mm and 2.6 mm). In contrast, Robo-THA showed significantly smaller absolute errors of cup position than both M-THA and Navi-THA (HCOR: 1.7 mm and 2.9 mm, vs. M-THA, 1.6 mm and 2.5 mm vs. Navi-THA, VCOR:1.7 mm and 2.4 mm, vs. M-THA, 1.4 mm and 2.2 mm vs. Navi-THA). Robo-THA also showed significantly smaller absolute errors of cup orientation than both M-THA and Navi-THA (RI: 1.4° and 5.7°, vs. M-THA, 1.5° and 3.6°, vs. Navi-THA, RA: 1.9° and 5.8° vs. M-THA, 2.1° and 3.8° vs. Navi-THA). Robotic-arm assisted system showed more accurate cup position and orientation compared to manual and CT-based navigation in THA for DDH. CT-based navigation increased the accuracy of cup orientation compared to manual procedures, but not cup position.
Golf is considered low-impact sport, but concerns exist about whether golf swing can be performed in safe manner after THA. The purpose of this study was to clarify dynamic hip kinematics during golf swing after THA using image-matching techniques. This study group consisted of eight right-handed recreational golfers with 10 primary THAs. Each operation was performed using a posterolateral approach with combined anteversion technique. Nine of ten polyethylene liners used had elevated portion of 15°. Continuous radiographic images of five trail and five lead hips during golf swing were recorded using a flat panel X-ray detector (Fig. 1) and analyzed using image-matching techniques (Fig. 2). The relative distance between the center of cup and femoral head and the minimum liner-to-stem distance were measured using a CAD software program. The cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem anteversion were measured in postoperative CT data. Hip kinematics, orientation of components, and cup-head distance were compared between patients with and without liner-to-stem contact by Mann-Whitney INTRODUCTION
METHODS
3D-to-2D model registration technique has been used for evaluating 3D kinematics from 3D surface models of the prostheses or bones and radiographic image sequences. However, no studies have employed these techniques to evaluate Dynamic hip kinematics during gait, squatting, chair-rising, and twisting were analyzed for six healthy subjects and eleven patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Continuous anteroposterior radiographic images were recorded using a flat panel X-ray detector Introduction
Measurement
