High flexion knee arthroplasties have been designed to allow up to 155 degrees flexion and enable high flexion activities such as kneeling and squatting. To date randomised controlled trials have shown no difference in range of movement (ROM) between high flexion and standard designs. The aim of this study was to determine if there is a difference in functional outcome and ROM between the standard and high flexion design of the PFC Sigma TKA system.Introduction
Objectives
Adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) is a debilitating condition affecting 2–5% of the adult population. Its aetiology is still unclear and there is no consensus on the most effective treatment. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the mid-term functional outcome of one specific treatment protocol. Patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis treated by one orthopaedic surgeon between 2004 and 2008 were identified from outpatient clinic letters. All patients had initially received conservative treatment, consisting of physiotherapy with capsular stretches and subacromial injections. Patients in whom conservative treatment failed underwent an arthroscopic capsular release. At a minimum of two years following diagnosis patients were sent the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS [0 to 48]), Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC [0 to 2100]) and a satisfaction questionnaire by post. In addition case notes were reviewed and type of treatment and range of movement (ROM) recorded.Background
Methods
The purpose of this study was to establish whether men and women with a fragility hip fracture were equally investigated and treated for osteoporosis. A retrospective review was carried out including 91 patients (48 females, 43 males) who were admitted with a fragility hip fracture between March 2003 and April 2004. Data about age, sex, investigations and medication were collected from the case notes, GP surgeries and the bone densitometry database. Investigations and treatment were compared with current guideline recommendations (SIGN 2003, NICE 2005). Data were analysed using SPSS Version 13.0.Introduction
Methods
Large and massive rotator cuff tears can cause persistent pain and significant disability. These tears are often chronic with substantial degeneration of the involved tendons. Surgical treatment is challenging and the functional outcome after repair less predictable then for smaller tears. The aim of this study was to determine the functional outcome and rate of re-rupture after mini-open repair of symptomatic large and massive rotator cuff tears using a modified two-row technique. Twenty-four patients, who were operated on under the care of a single surgeon between 2003 and 2006, were included in this study. Patients were assessed prospectively before and at a mean of 27 months after surgery using Constant Score and Oxford Shoulder Score. This assessment was carried out by an independent physiotherapist specialising in shoulder rehabilitation. At follow-up an ultrasound was carried out by a musculoskeletal radiographer to determine the integrity of the rotator cuff repair. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a simple questionnaire. The mean Constant Score improved significantly from 36 preoperatively to 68 postoperatively (p<
0.0001), the mean Oxford Shoulder Score from 39 to 20 (p<
0.0001). Four patients (16.7%) had a re-rupture diagnosed by ultrasound. 87.5% of patients were satisfied with the outcome of their surgery. Tear size and repair integrity did not significantly influence functional outcome. 87.5% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome of their surgery. This study shows that the two-row repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears using a mini-open approach is an effective method of repair with a comparatively low re-rupture rate. It significantly improves the functional outcome and leads to a very high patient satisfaction. We conclude that these results justify repair of large to massive rotator cuff tears when possible, irrespective of chronicity of symptoms.
Before surgery patients were asked to complete a psychological questionnaire consisting of Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-r), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Recovery Locus of Control (RLOC). Knee function was assessed preoperatively, at six weeks and one year using Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and range of motion (ROM).
The psychological factors Consequences, Illness Coherence, Emotional Representation and HADS Anxiety showed a statistically significant correlation with the OKS at six weeks, the factors Consequences and HADS Anxiety and HADS Depression with the OKS at one year. We found no correlation with range of motion at six weeks, but ROM at one year was statistically significantly correlated with the factors Consequences and HADS Depression. This indicates that patients who believed that their illness had less impact on their personal lives and patients with lower scores on the anxiety and depression scale showed a lower OKS and higher ROM at one year, indicating a better functional outcome. Hierarchical regression analysis showed that, after controlling for demographics and baseline scores, the factor consequences explained 7% of the variance in ROM at one year. HADS Anxiety and Depression had a significant impact on OKS and accounted for 13.7% of the variance of OKS at one year.
MRSA infections are a current concern in the elderly orthopaedic patient, with colonisation rates of between 417% reported in these patient groups. In our institution there has been concern regarding MRSA surgical site infection and cross contamination of elective and emergency patients. This prompted the unit to consider a screening programme to identify MRSA carriers. We undertook the following project to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing such a screening programme. The aim was to to ascertain the incidence of colonisation with MRSA, rate of wound infection and associated risk factors in patients admitted with a fractured proximal femur. This was a prospective, blinded case series of 100 consecutive patients admitted to the trauma ward with a fractured proximal femur. Three swabs (axilla, nasal and perineum) were taken within 24 hours of admission. Data from each patient was collated and each patient was followed until discharge to assess for surgical site infection. The age range was 60–97 years. 26% were admitted from institutional care. Four patients were colonised with MRSA on admission. An association was seen between patients colonised on admission and long term or recent residence in institutional care. One of these patients went on to develop colonisation of the surgical wound however this did not lead to surgical site infection and the patient was successfully treated with MRSA eradication therapy only. In these 4 patients all wounds healed satisfactorily with no evidence of infection. While MRSA continues to be a growing concern in the press we found that rates of colonisation and subsequent infection were not high. There were no documented cases of MRSA wound infection in colonised individuals. Given the cost to detect these low levels of colonisation we do not feel that a screening regime would be cost effective or justified. Correspondence should be addressed to Major M Butler RAMC, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, Devon.
In our institution there has been concern regarding MRSA surgical site infection and possible cross contamination of elective and emergency patients. There would be implications for implant related infections if this were to occur. This had prompted the unit to consider adopting a screening programme to identify and treat MRSA carriers. This would aim to minimise risk of post operative infection and cross infection. As little was actually known about the MRSA colonisation rates of admissions to our hospital we undertook the following project to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing such a screening programme.
There were three superficial surgical site infections postoperatively, all in individuals who were clear on their admission screening. Of these two were due to MRSA and one was due to MSSA. There were no cases of deep infection requiring further surgery.