The evaluation of the outcome of CCK prostheses in primary TKA Between 2002 and 2008 we implanted 34 CCK knees in 31 patients. Mean age was 69 (58–79) 10 patients were operated because of valgus knee and lateral compartment arthritis, 8 because of post-traumatic ligamentous laxity and/or bone loss and the remaining patients presented with advanced OA and varus deformity exceeding 30 degrees. All patients were followed regularly with radiographs annually and there were assessed clinically with KSS and Womac score. The findings were compared with a group of patients with similar characteristics and a CR prosthesis. Mean follow-up was 3 years (6–1) There was no revision in this group neither was any radiological abnormality. Clinical outcome in terms of KSS and WOMAC score was excellent and comparable to the CR group. The main indication for a CCK prosthesis is the ligamentous insufficiency. There is enough evidence to support its superiority as a treatment option in valgus knees but long term performance is yet unclear. CCK prostheses are a reliable solution for unstable or imbalanced knees their long term behaviour though, is yet unclear
at the level of the joint line at the mid-portion of the bone bridge and at the base of the bone bridge. In addition, the bone density of the bone bridge was measured in Hounsfield units (HU) in the same locations. Bone density of the anterior tibial cortex lateral femoral condyle, and adjacent cancellous area, and were measured for comparisons.
All patients where followed up prospectively and evaluated clinically and radiologicaly at three, six months at one year and yearly thereafter. The clinical outcome was assessed with the Harris Hip score (HHS) and Oxford Score (OS).
There were four dislocations in this group. One required open reduction and head replacement while another one needed cup revision due to mal orientation. There were five femoral fractures treated intraoperatively with wires, two patients developed transient sciatic nerve palsy and two non fatal PE. Harris Hip Score was 91 (range 69 to 97) compared with 48 (range 24 to 58) before surgery. The outcome was excellent in 59 hips, very good in 8, good in two and fair in one. Leg length discrepancy more than 2 cm was evident in five unilateral cases (range 2 to 4.5). Trendelebourgh sign was evident in four patients.
Type of study: double randomised prospective, comparison of 2 different procedures.