Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 16 - 16
1 Mar 2012
Sharma D Agarwal A Hammer A
Full Access

The hook screw method is a direct repair technique that permits ‘restitutio ad integrum’ for a functional segment. The surgical method of treating spondylolysis and grade 1 spondylolisthesis by spondylytic hook screw reduction and bone grafting in 34 patients is reported. Of these patients, 32 showed good to excellent results.

Surgical technique

The bone on either side of the defect is roughened. Then the screws are inserted after pre-drilling into the base of the articular process inclined at 400 to the vertebral endplate and diverging 15 to 20 degrees from each side. Then the special hooks, hooked under the lamina, are fixed to the screws by nuts over a spring so as to obtain compression over the defect. Autologous cancellous bone graft is placed in the defect.

Materials and methods

A total of 34 patients were included in this study from 1998 to 2006, 32 male and 2 female patients. Pre-operative and post-operative Oswestry Lumbar Disability Index score (OLDI) and SF 36 scores recorded.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 141 - 141
1 Mar 2009
Morar Y Maharaj Y Day S Hammer A Agarwal A
Full Access

Introduction: The ideal regimen for safe and effective post operative pain relief inspinal surgery remains elusive. Numerous studies have been conducted comparing epidural with patient controlled analgesia with no firm conclusion as to which is best.

Aims: To determine the efficacy of acute pain relief between surgical placed epidural catheter and patient controlled analgesia for lumbar spinal surgery.

Method: A 42 month retrospective survey of 82 spinal surgery patients case notes and anaesthetic charts performed by a consultant spinal surgeon and his registrar from 2002 to 2005. There were 34 epidural and 48 PCA patients. Visual analogue Score (0–10) at 6 hourly intervals up to 36 hours, complications and age of patient were looked at. Exclusion criteria for epidural were dural tear, history of hypotension, unexplained neurological symptoms, and bleeding disorders and surgeon choice. Epidural infusion consisted of bupivacaine 0.1% with 5mls loading dose and 10mls/ hour infusion and PCA consisted of morphine sulphate 2mg/ml with a 1ml loading dose and 5 minute lockout interval.All patients were on standard analgesia which included oromorph 5mg four hourly orally and paracetamol 1gram six hourly as required orally. No radiographic evidence of epidural catheter placement was performed. Post-operative complications which included hypotension, nausea, vomiting, and drowsiness were monitored.

Results: The average age for the epidural group was 46.9 and PCA group 49.8. The most striking finding was that the average pain score at each six hourly interval waslower in the epidural group. This was significant in the first 18 hours post-operatively.However, 3 complications occurred in the epidural group which included hypotension. In addition, 3 epidural infusions were stopped and changed to PCA most likely due to improper placement of catheter. There were no complications with the PCA group.

Conclusion: This observational study demonstrates clinically and statistically that in the acute post-operative phase and up to 36 hours that epidural analgesia for lumbar spine surgery is more effective than PCA. From this survey, the risk of epidural was higher, although no serious complications occurred. Surgeon placement of catheter is also important in the effective delivery of epidural pain relief. The lower efficacy of the PCA may have been due to poor patient understanding of the concept of PCA and thereforeits


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 144 - 145
1 Mar 2006
Agarwal A Hammer A
Full Access

Prospective Study Design. 198 consecutive patients with back pain leg pain with MRI scan showing disc prolapse were operated from June 2001 to January 2004. In 22 patients it was found that the cause of nerve root compression was a localised venous plexus and the disc was intact.

Objectives: To emphasize the fact that the clinical presentation of a localised venous plexus of epidural veins in the lumbar spine can resemble that of an acute disc prolapse.

Summary of Background data: After reporting 6 cases of this type in Spine Volume 28 Number 1 we designed a prospective study of all discetomies done in our institution. Our outcome suggests that the finding of enlarged epidural veins during lumbar spine disc decompression is relatively common, but it is only recently that they have been implicated as the cause of the presenting symptoms.

Methods and Results: 198 patients presented with severe low back pain accompanied by sciatica, which had begun acutely. Physical examination in most of these patients showed the presence of neurological signs in the affected leg. The diagnosis of possible disc prolapse with nerve compression was demonstrated by MRI scan. However , at surgery, in 22 patients the intervertebral disc appeared to be relatively normal without any bulge and intact annulus, but a large venous structure in the form of plexus of epidural vein compressing the nerve root was found in the spinal canal.. The configuration of this venous plexus matched the MRI findings. The symptoms were relieved by decompression of the spinal canal and ablation of the veins.

Conclusion: Lumbar spine venous plexi of epidural veins can cause nerve root compression and the MRI image of a localised plexus of epidural veins can closely resemble that of a prolapsed intervertebral disc. Could this be the cause of failed back syndrome in patients who have already undergone decompression and discetomy? Wenger et al show success rate of 92.5% to 94.7% after discetomy but still there is an failure rate of 7.5 to 5.3% leading to failed back syndrome. The incidence of symptomatic lumbar epidural varices is said to be low. Zimmerman et al quoted their incidence as 0.067% and Hanley et al 5%. Our study shows an incidence of 11.11%.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 119 - 119
1 Mar 2006
Agarwal A Selven Hammer A Deep K Morar Y
Full Access

Purpose of the study: To establish the difference between AO plate osteosynthesis and Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing and the long-term outcome.

Design: Prospective randomised study.

Material: During 2000 and 2002 prospective randomised study was carried out where children with diaphysial fracture of long bone was either treated with osteosynthesis with AO plate or ESIN. 32 children had AO plate osteosynthesis and 34 children had ESIN procedure.

Methods: In our series of patients managed with ESIN Nailing 24 had forearm fracture 6 had femur fracture 2 had humeral and 2 had tibial fracture. The other group with AO plate osteosynthesis had 25-forearm fracture 1 humeral fracture 4 tibial fractures and 2 femoral fractures.

Results: The group treated with AO plate osteosynthesis 2 had rotational deformity and rest did well. The recovery period after removal of metal work was longer.

The group treated with ESIN procedure 1 patient fell down and bend the C-Nail, which was straightened in situ, and the fracture healed with slight curvature of the femur, which corrected slowly with growth. The forearm fractures did not have any rotational deformity. The recovery period post removal of the ESIN was very short.

Conclusion: We find that ESIN is a superior procedure for diaphysial fractures of long bone in children and AO plating should only be done in cases where ESIN is not possible.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 157 - 157
1 Mar 2006
Agarwal A Hammer A Morar Y Soler J
Full Access

Background context: Cauda equina following a prosthetic Disc nucleus replacement has never been reported.

Purpose: To describe a case of Cauda equina following migration of the Prosthetic disc nucleus and possible cause.

Study design: Case report and review of literature.

Patient Sample: Case report.

Outcome measures: 2 patients. Report of presenting symptoms and review of radiographs.

Method/description: A 24-year-old man presented with progressively worsening pain radiating down his right leg and low back pain. His MRI scan showed a disc bulge at L4/5 for which we underwent decompression and discetomy. 4 months later he presented again with same symptoms. MRI imaging showed a disc prolapse at L4/5. He underwent a revision decompression discectomy and a prosthetic disc nucleus replacement. On the 4th postoperative day he complained of urinary retention and was unable to move his right ankle with loss of sphincter tone. The plain radiographs showed that the prosthetic disc nucleus had migrated posteriorly. He was immediately taken to theatre, which showed posterior migration of the prosthetic disc nucleus compressing the theca and displacing the nerve root. The prosthetic disc nucleus was removed from the space relieving the tension of the nerve root and the theca.

Conclusions: Migration of Prosthetic disc nucleus can lead to cauda equina and this needs to be explained to the patient as possible risk factor. The angle of the vertebrae has to be measured before selecting a patient. If angle below 5 degree it is a high risk patient.