Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_18 | Pages 96 - 96
14 Nov 2024
Mahadeshwara MR Pandit H Hall RM Jawad MA Bryant M Gendy RE
Full Access

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) occurs due to a multi-scale degradation of articular cartilage (AC) surface which aggravates the disease condition. Investigating the micro-scale structural alterations and mechano-tribological properties facilitates comprehension of disease-mechanisms to improve future injectable-therapies. This study aims to analyze these properties using various experimental and analytical methods to establish correlations between their morpho-physiological features.

Method

In this study, Raman-spectroscopy was used to investigate microscale changes in AC constituents and categorize OA damage regions in knee-joint samples from joint replacement patients (Samples = 5 and Regions = 40). Following, microscale indentation and sliding tests were performed on these regions to evaluate variations in aggregate-modulus (AM) and elastic-modulus (EM), with coefficient of friction (COF). Finally, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed to analyze these morphological variations.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XVIII | Pages 54 - 54
1 May 2012
Hyde P Vicars R Fisher J Brown T Hall RM
Full Access

Introduction

It is believed that wear of replacement joints vivo in is strongly dependent on input motions (kinematics) and loading. There is difficulty in accurately measuring total disc replacement (TDR) kinematics in vivo. It is therefore desirable to ascertain the sensitivity of implant wear in vitro to perturbations of the standard testing parameters. An anterior-posterior (AP) shear force input is not currently included in the present ISO and ASTM testing standards for lumbar TDRs but is known to exist in in vivo. Other joint-replacement wear tests have shown that the phasing of input motions influences the ‘cross-shear’ process of polyethylene wear. Polyethylene bearing materials do not behave linearly to axial loading changes and so the effect on wear rate is difficult to predict. The study aim was to assess the effects on wear of a ProDisc-L TDR under the following conditions: ISO 18191-1 standard inputs; an additional input AP shear; input kinematics phasing changes; axial loading changes.

Methods

A five active degree of freedom (DOF) spine simulator was used to compare the effects of varying the kinematic and loading input parameters on a ProDisc-L TDR (Synthes Spine). A four DOF standard ISO (ISO18192-1) test was followed by a five DOF test which included the AP shear force. The standard ISO test was repeated on a second simulator (of identical design) but with the phasing of the lateral bend (LB) and flexion extension (FE) motions changed to be in-phase, creating a low cross-shear motion pattern. The standard ISO test was then modified to give half the ISO standard axial loading. All tests conducted were based on the ISO18192-1 standard for lumbar implants with 15 g/l protein lubricant and modified as described. Gravimetric wear measurements were taken every million cycles (mc) in units of milligrams (mg). Six discs were tested to give statistically significant results.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 428 - 428
1 Jul 2010
Sadani S Jones CR Seal A McShane P Bhakta B Hall RM Levesley MC
Full Access

The purpose of this study was to establish the a)feasibility, b) reproducibility of spinal Quantec scans (a non-intrusive surface topography system) and c) the validity of the Quantec Q-angle against Cobb angles from spinal radiographs, in non-ambulant children with cerebral palsy (CP).

Eighteen non-ambulant children (aged 5–11 years) with CP had successful clinical, radiological and Quantec assessment of their spine while seated in a supportive seating system.

Scoliosis incidence was 72%, Cobb angles ranged from 1–73° (mean 18.2°). Quantec scanning was feasible with appropriate postural support. Mean interobserver differences were 0.5 ± 5.8° (median 1.3°, 5 / 95th percentiles lying at −7.3 / 8.5° respectively). Mean differences between Cobb and Q-angle were 0.02 ± 6.2° (median 1.0°, with 5 / 95th percentiles lying at −8.2 / 7.7° respectively).

Surface topography may be used to safely monitor the spine for non-ambulant CP children. Results show similar or improved trends to previous comparisons with idiopathic scoliosis. Ovadia (2007) showed an interobserver mean difference of 6.3 ± 4.9° using an Ortelius800TM system. Thometz (2000) showed mean differences between Cobb and Q-angle ranging from 1.1–12.6 ± 4.9–10.2°. Further research is needed for the user group described in this study with larger spinal curves.

Ethics approval: Ethics approval granted by Leeds (West) Research Ethics Committee

COREC number: 08/H1307/22

Interest Statement: None