Tunnel enlargement after AC reconstruction with a hamstring autograft has been noticed mainly the first 3–6 months postoperatively. Its etiology involves biomechanical and biological factors. The aggressive rehabilitation program is another etiological factor. The aim of this study is to investigate the tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction with a Hamstring autograft by the aid of CT-scan. We investigate the tunnel diameter in a series of 25 consecutive patients who operated with a Hamstring autograft 3 months postoperatively. The mean age of the patients was 23.6 years old (18–35). The same femoral fixation system (XObutton) and the same tibial fixation system (bioabsorbable screw) were used in all the patients. All the follow the same rehabilitation program, partial weight bearing from the 1st postoperative day, brace for 3–5 weeks and return to sports activities in 6 months. In 2 patients a meniscal suture was performed and in 3 patients a partial meniscectomy was performed. All patients had excellent clinical result which was demonstrated by the physical examination and by the KT-1000 results. Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS system. We noticed a tunnel enlargement in the majority of the patients, but this was not statistical significant (P<
0.01). Tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring autograft has been noticed the first postoperative months, especially with the use of suspensor fixation systems. However in our study the tunnel enlargement is not correlated with a poor clinical outcome.
Fractures of the distal tibia metaphysis comprise a challenge for the orthopaedic trauma surgeon because of the poor blood irrigation they do not heal very easy leading sometimes to pseudarthrosis and many times arise problems with the skin. We compare the following techniques: LC-DCP and LCP plates, MIPO, External fixators (hybrids or simple one), intramedullary nailing with multiple screws at the distal end. 94 cases of distal tibia fractures from all AO types were treated during last 3 years (2005–2008) with the following techniques:
16 ORIF with LC-DCP plates 9 ORIF with LCP plates 19 MIPO 35 External fixators 15 intramedullary nailing The simple oblique or spiral fractures which treated with the 1st and 2nd method (ORIF), they do not seem any remarkable difference in healing but both methods demonstrate a delay in fracture healing over 5 months. The 3rd method display faster healing 2,5 months average in simple fractures with no skin wound at all. The 4th method display 3 pin track infections and dealt with removal of the material and 2 pseudarthrosis which encountered with ORIF and bone grafting from the iliac. The 5th method display 2 malunions but because of the small angle in varus we do not perform any treatment. Every technique has its own position on those type of fractures, depending of the personality of the fracture and the skill of the surgeon.