Posterolateral spinal fusion (PSLSF) in rabbits is a challenging model for bone substitutes because the transverse processes are extremely thin and the space to be filled with bone is greater than critical and meiopragic in terms of vascularity. Several investigators have shown beneficial effects of PRP in bone and soft-tissue healing processes. However, controversial results have been reported in clinical setting analysing the effectiveness of PRP. Aim of the present study was to test the effectiveness of PRP in experimental model of PLSF in rabbits. 20 White females New Zeland Rabbits were used. Seven rabbits (Group 1) had PRP plus carrier on the right side (Group 1A) and plus carrier and fresh bone marrow on the left side (Group 1B). Seven rabbits (Group 2) had carrier alone on the right side (Group 2A) and carrier plus fresh bone marrow on the left side (Group 2B). Six rabbits (Group 3) had sham operation on both right and left sides. Animals were sacrificed 6 months after surgery and the lumbar spine submitted to radiolographic and histologic analysis. Vascular density (VD) was also assessed in the different zone of the grafted material. Radiographs showed a complete fusion in 83% of group 1A and in 83% of group 1B, and in 86% of group 2A and 2B. Pseudarthrosis or non union, was observed in 1 specimen of group 1B and 2A and in all specimens of group 3 (sham). In contrast to radiographic results, no specimen showed a complete bony bridge between the transverse processes on histologic analysis. VD was significantly greater in the periapophyseal compared to the interapophyseal region of the graft material. However, no significant difference was found in the VD between groups.MATERIAL AND METHODS
RESULTS
A particular pattern of complex instability of the elbow is “the terrible triad”, in which elbow dislocation is associated with fractures of the coronoid and radial head. Other frequent patterns are the variant of Monteggia lesions (Bado II) described by Jupiter which is characterized by ulnar fracture associated with fracture-dislocation of proximal radius, and the articular fracture of the distal humerus associated with elbow dislocation. The goal of treatment is to restore the primary stabilizers of the elbow such as the coronoid process, olecranon and both collateral ligaments by internal fixation and reconstruction of the ligaments. If elbow stability obtained at operation is unsatisfactory or internal fixation not enough stable, there an indication for applying a dynamic external fixator (DEF). The latter allows:
the articular congruence to be maintained and the ligaments to heal in adequate tension and position, internal fixation and ligaments reconstruction to be protected, and immediate joint motion to be carried out. From 2005 to 2008, we treated surgically 31 patients with complex instability of the elbow. DEF was applied in 38% of cases, namely 3 terrible triads, 5 fracture-dislocations of Monteggia and 4 articular fractures of the humerus associated with elbow dislocation. The mean age of patients was 44 years (range 30–74). All patients underwent ORIF, reconstruction of ligaments and dynamic external fixation. The OptiROM elbow fixator was used In 2 patients, the Orthofix fixator in 1 and the DJD fixator in 9. In all cases, active elbow motion was allowed without restrictions from the second postoperative day. Indomethacin was consistently administered for 5 weeks to prevent heterotopic ossifications. The DEF was removed after 6 weeks. The mean follow-up was 25 months (range 5–44 months). At last follow-up, the clinical results, evaluated according to the MEPS, were excellent in 10 patients (83%), who had had a fast recovery of range of motion (ROM). The elbow was painless in all patients and stable in all but 1. Moderate osteoarthrosis was found in 60% of cases. Complications included: 1 elbow stiffness, 1 pseudarthrosis of capitulum humeri and trochlea, 1 transitory radial nerve palsy, and 1 superficial pin tract infection. In conclusion, DEF is a helpful tool for treatment of complex elbow instability, particularly when stable internal fixation cannot be obtained or instability persists after ligaments reconstruction. However, DEF increases morbidity, and implies a longer operative time and prolonged exposure to radiation.
determining the possible presence of anatomical variations of the safe-zone and analyzing the anatomical congruence of precontoured plates to this zone.
(flat) (25 %), (slightly concave) (63,6 %) and (markedly concave) (11,4 %), Adherence of a precoundered plate (Acumed) to the bone surface of the safe zone was performed independently by three of us, and the gap between plate and bone was measured. Plate adaptability was good in Type B, scarce in Type C and absent in Type A.
Posterolateral spinal fusion is considered one of the most challenging condition for bone graft substitutes since using autogenous bone graft pseudarthrosis have been reported in 30% of cases.
1) the cell-biomaterial constructs which per se were highly efficient in previous animal studies, used in different absolute quantities but identical ratios were not efficient in the direct preclinical model. 2) Radiography alone is misleading. 3) Once efficient cell and material preparations are obtained, additional consideration must be given to specific circumstances of the pre-clinical and clinical application such as mobility of the graft and its component and vascularization of the graft bed.
Since several spinal conditions are currently treated with spinal fusion, alternatives to autogenous bone graft in spinal surgery have been under study for many years. Results have shown that, compared to other non.-spinal conditions, such as filling bone cavities, spinal fusion, in particular posterolateral fusion, is much more challenging due to the reduced area of the graft bed. As a result, most of the bone substitutes are still under investigation and their effectiveness in the clinical setting has yet to be demonstrated. In recent years the authors analysed several bone graft substitutes using an animal model which has been widely used in experimental spinal fusion. In particular, porous ceramics have been used alone or with osteoin-ductive material such as fresh bone marrow or cultured mesenchymal stem cells. The results of these studies have shown that with ceramic alone a percentage of solid fusion similar to that with autogenous bone graft cannot be achieved. However, compared to the latter, more favorable results have been obtained when ceramics are loaded with mesenchymal stem cells. The addition of fresh bone marrow to ceramics also increases the fusion rates; however, in this case new bone formation was mainly found in the peripheral portions of the graft and to a lesser extent than when cultured mesenchymal stem cells were used.