Ewings Sarcoma (ES) and Osteosarcoma (OS) behave and respond differently to chemotherapy and any interpretation of diagnostics tests to predict a patients response to treatment must consider this. We reviewed 18F-FDG PET imaging characteristics of consecutive series of ES and OS patients to determine if any differences in PET imaging existed between them. A retrospective review was performed of 31 patients with ES and OS who received all their treatment by our group and who had pre- and post-chemotherapy 18F-FDG PET scans at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre from Jan 1, 1999 to December 1, 2009 (Table 1). Patients who did not have both their pre- and post-chemotherapy PET scans done at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre were excluded from the study to remove bias from having different PET scanning protocols. Patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to standard protocols, all starting within 2 weeks after the initial pre-chemotherapy PET scans (PET1). The PET scan taken after the last cycle of chemotherapy prior to surgery was considered as the post-chemotherapy scan (PET2). The ratio between pre and post-chemotherapy for each PET parameter was then associated with the histology response for both ES and OS, and positive (PPV) and negative predicting values (NPV) of each parameter were calculated.Purpose
Method
The role of adjuvants in curettage for giant cell tumours (GCT) is still controversial. Our aim was to determine if adjuvant cementation lowers local recurrence (LR) rates for GCTs treated with curettage. Detailed curettage has been the principal treatment for GCT for the past 30 years. Cement was used from 1996 onwards for tumours where there was concern about structural stability. We investigated factors affecting LR and also the incidence of complications for treatment with or without cement.Introduction
Methods
It is generally held that blood tests are not particularly helpful in establishing the diagnosis of bone tumours but may be useful in prognosis. We reviewed the results of blood tests taken at the time of diagnosis to establish the frequency of abnormalities in common blood tests and whether this was significant in staging or prognosis. Blood test results on all newly diagnosed patients with bone tumours from 2005 – 2010 were exported and abnormalities identified. This was matched to diagnosis, clinical features and prognosis.Introduction
Method
