Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 144 - 144
1 May 2016
Putzer D Fuchs J Coraca-Huber D Ammann C Liebensteiner M Nogler M
Full Access

Introduction

BAG-S53P4 has similar mechanical properties as cortical bone tissue and can be used as an additive to bone allografts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding BAG-S53P4 to chemically treated allografts with controlled grain size distribution.

Methods

Allografts were prepared and chemically cleaned under sterile conditions. 30 samples were mixed with BAG-S53P4 additive (BG) and compared to a control group (CG) with similar grain size distribution and composition in weight. All samples underwent a uniaxial compression test after compaction with a dropped weight apparatus. The yield limit was determined by a uniaxial compression test and density was recorded. The two groups were tested for statistical differences with the student's t-Test.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 424 - 424
1 Nov 2011
Fuchs J Shields W Schmidt W Liepins I Racanelli J
Full Access

Introduction: Uncemented proximally filling porous-coated femoral components must be designed with an optimal level of press-fit. Excessive press-fit yields higher femoral stress which can result in periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFx), whereas insufficient femoral stress can lead to a lack of initial mechanical stability, which “is necessary to achieve bone ingrowth into the porous surface” (Manley P.A. et. al., J Arthroplasty10:63–73, 1995) of the implant. An optimal press-fit design should also provide an accurate and repeatable femoral stem seating height in all patients.

A battery of cadaveric tests, physical “bench-top” tests, and finite element analyses (FEA) should be used in order to both quantitatively and qualitatively optimize a femoral press-fit design. In this study, a method is proposed to quantitatively rank candidate press-fit stem designs relative to successful predicates based on stem seating height and PPFx risk by recreating impact loading applied during surgery through a controlled “bench-top” model.

Methods: Three press fit candidate designs A, B & C and two clinically successful predicate proximal fit and fill stems (Secur-Fit™ Max (Fit & Fill 1) and Meridian® TMZF® (Fit & Fill 2), Stryker, Mahwah NJ) were evaluated. Five foam cortical shell Sawbones® femur samples (Item# 1130, Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, WA) were prepared for each press-fit design. A stem impactor was attached to the stem and then the stem was hand inserted in the femur. Then the construct was mounted in the drop tower using a vice and initial drop height was set to generate approximately 5500 N of impaction force when fully seated. Each stem was serially impacted until stable then step loaded until PPFx occurred. The height above/below the medial resection plane was measured after each impaction.

Results: All press-fit designs had an initial stable seating height within the desired range without causing PPFx, using an average impaction load of 5341 N. All of the press-fit designs required, on average, roughly a 200% increase in impact load (10925 N) to cause PPFx. The press-fit deign which ranked first based on seating height accuracy, defined as the design closest to zero at stable, was Design C at −0.02 mm countersunk. Design A with a standard deviation of 0.09 mm ranked first for repeatability, defined as the design with the smallest standard deviation at stable. Finally the press-fit design which ranked first for lowest PPFx risk, defined as the design that is most countersunk prior to PPFx, was Fit & Fill 1 at 6.30 mm countersunk.

Discussion: This controlled “bench-top” impact loading model successfully showed that it can quantitatively evaluate stem seating height and PPFx risk for several different femoral press-fit designs. In order to determine the optimal design, each press-fit design was ranked with equal weight given to seating height and fracture risk. Using this test method one design alternative, press-fit Design C, ranked first as the optimal combination of seating height accuracy and consistency with a low risk of PPFx. A limitation of this impaction model is that it does not directly predict PPFx rate, it only quantifies risk of fracture. Another limitation is that this model does not simulate all of the variably that is inherent to actual patient bone types. This test is one step in a battery of tests, including cadaveric evaluation and FEA, which should be used in order to optimize a femoral press-fit design.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 462 - 462
1 Jul 2010
Seitz G Schäfer J Ellerkamp V Dietz K Bosk A Müller I Warmann S Fuchs J
Full Access

Radical surgical resection of metastases is an important prognostic factor for survival of patients suffering from solid pediatric tumors. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of median sternotomy as treatment option for the resection of multiple bilateral lung metastases in children with different tumor entities. Furthermore, the sensitivity of preoperative imaging (CT) was assessed by intraoperative findings.

Between 2002 and 2007, thirteen children (4x sarcoma, 4x nephroblastoma, 5x hepatoblastoma) underwent median sternotomy for resection of bilateral lung metastases after R0 – resection of the primary tumor. In 6/13 cases, the sternotomy was combined with the primary tumor resection.

Median patients at the first operation age was 5 years (range: 11 months – 17 years). The median total number of resected metastases per operation was 9 and ranged from 0 to 65. In 13/16 operations, the intraoperative number of metastases did not agree with the preoperative radiological work-up. Median hospital stay was 14 days (range from 9 to 36 days). 10/13 children are alive after a median follow–up of 13 months (range from 6 to 66 months).

Median sternotomy is an adequate treatment modality for the resection of bilateral pulmonary metastases as a one stage procedure. The combination of primary tumor resection with sternotomy should be considered as treatment option. Complete resection of metastases of solid pediatric tumors should be aimed for in order to increase the survival of these patients.