The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a relationship between ultrasound measured gap size and functional outcomes in non-operatively treated achilles tendon ruptures. Patients who presented with complete achilles tendon ruptures were prospectively randomised to operative or non-operative treatment groups and followed over a one year period. The non-operative patients were selected and reassessed at three months, six months and one year. Patients were included if seen within seven days of their injury and had ultrasound confirmation of a complete tear. Non-operative treatment consisted of a functional bracing protocol with an aircast boot. Ultrasound measures included tear location and gap size in neutral, dorsiflexion, and plantar flexion of the ankle. Outcome measures were re-rupture rates, complications, range of motion, calf circumference, strength, and functional outcome scores. Twenty-five patients were included with complete data. The mean plantar flexion gap was 5.6(+/−7.5mm). The mean dorsiflexion gap was 13.7(+/−12.5mm). Proximal tears were found in 41% of patients, midsubstance in 27%, and distal tears in 32%. At one year follow-up 71% of patients had excellent results with the remaining 29% showing good results. Isokinetic strength, range of motion, and calf circumference measurements were all greater than 90% relative to the contralateral extremity. There were two reruptures and no other complications present. There were no significant relationships between plantar or dorsiflexion gap size and functional outcomes scores or tear location. Gap size was not significantly related to functional outcomes. Non-operative treatment produced very good results at one year follow-up with low complication rates. These results suggest that ultrasound estimation of gap size and location may be of limited clinical value in the management of achilles tendon ruptures.
Summary Results of this two-group parallel design randomised controlled trial indicated one and two year outcomes following ACL reconstruction were not different in one hundred and fifty patients using either an ACL functional knee brace or neoprene knee sleeve. Introduction: The primary objective of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes in patients using an ACL functional knee brace and patients using a neoprene knee sleeve One hundred and fifty patients were randomised to receive an ACL functional knee brace (n=76) or a neoprene sleeve (n=74) at their six week postoperative visit following primary ACL reconstruction. Patients were instructed to wear the knee orthosis during participation in all physical activities. Patients were assessed preoperatively, six weeks, six, twelve, eighteen and twenty-four months postoperatively. Outcome measures included disease-specific quality of life (ACL QOL), KT 1000 and single limb forward hop test administered by a blinded research assistant. One and two-year outcomes were compared after adjusting for baseline scores. A priori directional subgroup hypotheses based on time from injury to surgery, pre-operative KT 1000 scores, and one and two-year compliance scores were evaluated using tests for interactions. Analysis was completed on an intention-to-treat basis. There were no significant between-group differences for any of the outcomes at one and two-year follow-ups. Mean between-group differences at two years were: 2.87% (95% CI: −3.85 – 9.60) for the ACL QOL, 0.07mm (95% CI: −0.80 – 0.93) for KT 1000 side-to-side difference, and 2.64% (95% CI: −4.57 – 9.85) for hop limb symmetry index. There were no significant subgroup findings and adverse events were similar between groups. Confidence intervals for between-group differences are narrow and exclude clinically important differences. These findings suggest a functional knee brace does not result in superior outcomes over a neoprene sleeve following ACL reconstruction.
Thirty-six patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency and varus malalignment were treated with combined ACL reconstruction and medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Average follow-up was twenty-five months. All patients had improved ligamentous stability and twenty-five patients returned to full activities. Osteotomy union rate was 100%, mechanical axis angle was corrected from six degrees varus to neutral and the mechanical axis deviation was corrected from 2cm medial to 1cm lateral. We experienced four complications, including one deep infection. Combining ACL reconstruction and HTO simultaneously accomplishes a ligamentously stable knee with corrected alignment, allowing patients to return to activity. To determine clinical outcome after combined ACL reconstruction and medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). ACL reconstruction with medial opening HTO can be a beneficial procedure in properly selected patients presenting with complaints of both pain and instability. Correction of varus mal-alignment may provide protection for articular cartilage and improve joint stability. Concomitant medial opening HTO performed at time of ACL reconstruction allows patients to return to activities after one procedure with a ligamentously stable knee, corrected alignment, and potential protection of articular cartilage. Thirty-six patients who underwent ACL reconstruction along with medial opening HTO were retrospectively evaluated postoperatively at an average of twenty-five months. Average age was thirty-seven years at time of surgery. All patients were recreationally active. Pre-operatively all patients had knee pain and instability, varus angulation, and twenty-two patients had previous knee surgery. Semitendinosus/gracilis grafts were used in all patients, and osteotomies were fixed with Puddu plates. Postoperatively patients had improved ligmentous stability with radiographic and clinical evidence of osteotomy healing, and all but nine patients have returned to full activities. We experienced four complications: one ACL failure, one case of anterior laxity with tibial tunnel widening, and two infections. On average, MAD was corrected from 22mm medial to 10mm lateral; mechanical axis angle was corrected from 6.4 degrees of varus to 0.2 degrees of valgus; tibial slope was increased from 9.1 degrees to 10.3 degrees, and patellar height ratio was decreased from 0.9 to 0.8.
The peak external knee adduction moment during walking gait has been proposed to be a clinically useful measure of dynamic knee joint load in patients with knee osteoarthritis. However, there is limited information about the reliability of this measure, or its ability to detect change. The test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change of peak knee adduction moments were evaluated in thirty patients with varus gonarthrosis. Indices of relative and absolute reliability were excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.85, standard error of measurement = 0.36 % BW*Ht), and the sensitivity to change following high tibial osteotomy was high (standardized response mean = 1.2). To estimate the test-retest reliability, measurement error and sensitivity to change of the peak knee adduction moment during gait. Thirty patients (44”11 yrs, 1.7”0.09 m, 87”20 kg, twenty males, ten females) with varus gonarthrosis underwent gait analyses on two pre-operative test occasions within one week, and on a third test occasion six months after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic gait data were collected during self-paced walking and used to calculate the peak knee adduction moment. An intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.71, 0.93) indicated excellent relative reliability, and a standard error of measurement of 0.36 %BW*Ht (95%CI: 0.29, 0.49) indicated low measurement error. The peak knee adduction moment after surgery (1.66”0.72 %BW*Ht) was significantly (p<
0.001) lower than before surgery (2.58”0.72 %BW*Ht). A standardized response mean of 1.2 (95%CI: 0.77, 1.6) indicated the size of this change was large. Based on 95% confidence levels, these results suggest the error in an individual’s peak knee adduction moment at one point in time is 0.70 % BW*Ht, the minimal detectable change in an individual’s peak adduction moment is 1.0 %BW*Ht, and it is sensitive to change following treatment. The peak knee adduction moment during gait has appropriate reliability for use in studies evaluating the effect of treatments intended to decrease the load on the knee. When considering measurement error, the knee adduction moment is also appropriate for clinical use in evaluating change in individual patients. Funding: CIHR, Arthrex Inc.