Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 352 - 352
1 Jul 2011
Mourikis A Ioannidis K Vatikiotis G Flevarakis G Economopoulos D Kormas T
Full Access

Bloodless field in limb musculoskeletal tumours’ surgery has great value as it facilitates resection and reconstructions without excessive bleeding.

40 large bone or soft tissue tumors located in upper (n=4) and lower limbs (n=36) were resected and reconstructed in bloodless surgical field achieved by a new device, an elastic silicone ring (S-Mart, OHK Medical Device). Proper size of it is chosen between items of different diameter, length and elasticity depending on their measurements and BP. Our goal was safe and sufficient blood pressure for bloodless operation. In tumours, esh-mark and any pressure on the mass results in microscopic spread. We rolled the ring along the limb, starting from digits and exsanguinated the limb raising it above the tumour to avoid crushing it. If tumours extend too proximally to hip and shoulder we cannot use tourniquet because cuffs are wide enough to allow proximal extension of the incision. The elastic ring we used, is too narrow (Φ< 20cm) and proved of utmost importance in large, bleeding growths helping tumour elimination and limb salvaging. The ring was applied from 18–120 minutes created completely bloodless surgical field thus facilitating and speeding up the operation. The time needed for application was shorter than for pneumatic tourniquet (< 10sec). After removing the elastic ring we noticed neither BP drop nor tumour spread or complications of skin and neurovascular elements pressure.

Thus we conclude that limb ischaemia achieved with special elastic rings have benefits and may be considered as safe in oncological surgery.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 352 - 352
1 Jul 2011
Flevarakis G Vatikiotis G Papaioannou M Mourikis A Kyrargyris G Kormas T
Full Access

Complex limb-salvage surgical techniques and reconstruction with sophisticated massive endoprostheses prove to be excellent tools for effective bone tumour management.

We treated 34 bone tumours (osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, plasmatocytoma, Ewing’s, osseous lymphoma, histocytosis-X, MFH, mets). We excised the lesions on oncologically safe surgical margins (wide excision inclunding anatomical barriers to tumour spread) and we reconstructed the defects with 29 modular and 5 custom designed and manufactured massive endoprostheses. Intramedullary stems were all cemented and they were supplied with hydroxyapatite collars that favour callus formation and extramedullary stabilisation. We did 12 proximal femoral tumour reconstructions, 17 distal femoral and proximal tibial tumours with rotating metal or polyethylene fixed-hinge knee implants and 1 total femur. In upper limb we did 2 proximal humerous with reverse polarity shoulder endoprostheses. In 1 humeral shaft case we did subtotal excision and reconstruction with two joint-saving endoprosthesis. In 1 distal humerus tumour we used custom constrained endoprosthesis of distal humerus and elbow. If tumours did not extend too close to the cartilage we applied joint-saving techniques. Function was restored with proper implant size selection and rearrangement of muscle remnants. On follow-up (4–58 months) average TESS score was 83%. There was no local recurrence and no aseptic loosening, dislocation or implant failure. Three patients with metastatic disease DOD. One case presented with late DVT and one with late deep infection.

New surgical methods and sophisticated implants with evidence-based design contributed greatly to successful limb salvage surgery as well as in overall patient prognosis and survival who enjoy better function.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 346 - 346
1 Jul 2011
Flevarakis G Papaioannou M Plaitakis I Vatikiotis G Nixon J Kormas T
Full Access

We evaluated the use of unreamed expanding nails in prophylactic stabilization of impending fractures in patients with multiple bone mets.

During 2004–2008 we treated 25 impending fractures due to metastasis (11 male, 14 female patients) with so-called expanding intramedullary nails. All they had multiple bone mets and signs of impending fracture due to extensive osteolysis. We stabilized 6 impending humeral fractures, 15 femoral and 1 tibial with antegrade nailing and 3 pertrochanteric with cephalomedullary nailing. Fluoroscopy was used to check the nail entry-point. No medullary reaming was performed. The nails were not interlocked at the mid-shaft but fixed rather firmly within the medullary cavity after introducing normal saline under pressure that expands its walls. The operation time ranged from 12min (humerus) to 25min (pertrochanteric). No blood transfusion was necessary. On follow-up (8–41 mos) all patients were reviewed. In all cases the risk of impending fracture was remarkably decreased. The patients with humeral fractures regained function quickly. The patiens with lower limb fractures were mobilized immediately post-op and were allowed to walk with TWB.

Surgery of impending fractures of long bones in patients with multiple bone mets is palliative. It aims in safer patient’s mobilization, fracture risk reduction, pain control and function restoration in order to render the patient capable to continue the treatment for the main disease. The expanding nailing is indicated in selected cases as it can be inroduced quickly and effectively with minimal blood loss and morbidity.