The ability to edit DNA at the nucleotide level using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) systems is a relatively new investigative tool that is revolutionizing the analysis of many aspects of human health and disease, including orthopaedic disease. CRISPR, adapted for mammalian cell genome editing from a bacterial defence system, has been shown to be a flexible, programmable, scalable, and easy-to-use gene editing tool. Recent improvements increase the functionality of CRISPR through the engineering of specific elements of CRISPR systems, the discovery of new, naturally occurring CRISPR molecules, and modifications that take CRISPR beyond gene editing to the regulation of gene transcription and the manipulation of RNA. Here, the basics of CRISPR genome editing will be reviewed, including a description of how it has transformed some aspects of molecular musculoskeletal research, and will conclude by speculating what the future holds for the use of CRISPR-related treatments and therapies in clinical orthopaedic practice.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(7):351–359.

Clinical translation of MSC therapies in orthopaedics has been hampered by heterogeneity and a lack of standardised and validated testing protocols for quality assurance. Although minimal criteria have been proposed¹, it is apparent that these do not predict performance in vivo. We used a combinatorial antibody profiling tool to probe the surface immunophenotype of human bone marrow derived MSCs and used this to define new marker panels. Cells were cultured from three marrow donors using specified expansion conditions and probed by high throughput flow cytometry using a panel of 230 antibodies. Analysis of expression of the surface proteins revealed significant variation in response to culture conditions and considerably less variation between donors. Of the panel of 230 markers 107 were negative, 24 had high expression in all samples, 1 had low expression and 98 displayed significant differences between cell preparations. Cluster analyses revealed that marker expression in one culture condition varied considerably from the other two. Phenotypic characterization of the cell preparations, assessed by analysis of differentiation propensity, showed similar patterns of variability between these samples. This suggests that the selected panel may be used as phenotypic MSC markers. Ongoing work involves the generation of novel antibody arrays which will be used as quality tests in a manufacturing environment. These tests will be used for in-process and product release applications for enhanced cell manufacturing and improved clinical outcomes.