Introduction: Following the successful introduction of a short stay programme for total hip replacements for selected cases in our unit, the effect of utilising an “Outreach Team” for all of our primary joint arthroplasties has been assessed. This team comprises a senior orthopaedic sister and a physiotherapy assistant. Their ethos is to provide continuity of care from the ward into the community, thereby allowing early, supported hospital discharge. We compared length of stay in a case-matched series of patients before and after the introduction of the service. Patient satisfaction was assessed and cost-benefit analysis carried out.

Methods: 200 patients were enrolled on the Outreach Programme following primary joint arthroplasty. Results were compared with 200 case-matched primary arthroplasties prior to the introduction of the team. Discharge was only allowed when patients, carers and staff were happy. Patient satisfaction was assessed via questionnaires.

Results: Following a cost-benefit analysis, we calculate a saving of approximately £235,000 annually, with 936 bed days saved.

99% of patients satisfied with Outreach. There were no readmissions from the Outreach group.

Discussion: The use of an Outreach Team can be used to significantly reduce the length of hospital stay after primary joint arthroplasty. We feel that the use of the same carers on the ward and in the community gives a seamless transition of care, allowing patients to feel secure and confident about their early discharge with high levels of satisfaction. This simple service is highly efficient and cost-effective and we recommend our model to other units.

Introduction: Recent studies have shown that Minimally Invasive Total Hip Replacements (MISTHRs) have not reduced hospital stay. We seek to demonstrate the importance of infrastructure allowing early mobilisation and discharge thereby gaining the full benefits of MISTHRs.

We compared the early outcomes of 2 units where MISTHRs were carried out by the same surgical teams but had 2 different infrastructure set-ups. In the first unit a “Short Stay Programme” (SSP) was in place. This involved early pre-operative assessment by medical, physiotherapy and occupational therapy teams. Post-operative analgesia was augmented with the use of a pain pump administering local anaesthetic as a continuous infusion. Patients were mobilised at 4 hours after surgery and were supported in the community by an “Outreach Team”. In the second unit the patients had MISTHRs without changes to the conventional infrastructure.

Methods: One surgeon carried out all operations, at 2 different hospitals using a mini-posterior approach with specific minimally-invasive instrumentation. Uncemented ABG II prostheses were used. Hospital discharge was only achieved after specific criteria were fulfilled.

Discussion: A significant reduction in the length of stay of MISTHRs patients is achieved by the Short Stay Programme, with no difference in complications. The full advantages of MISTHRs are achieved only if the whole aim of the care pathway is to facilitate early, supported discharge. Trouble-shooting pre-operatively, effective analgesia and post-operative support are the key elements of this programme.