Purpose

The management of moderate to large engaging Hill-Sachs lesions is controversial and surgical options include remplissage, allograft reconstruction, and partial resurfacing arthroplasty. Few in-vitro studies have quantified their biomechanical characteristics and none have made direct comparisons. The purpose of this study was to compare joint stability and range of motion (ROM) among these procedures using an in-vitro shoulder simulator. It was hypothesized that all procedures would prevent defect engagement, but allograft and partial resurfacing would most accurately restore intact biomechanics; while remplissage would provide the greatest stabilization, possibly at the expense of motion.

Purpose

The coronoid and collateral ligaments are key elbow stabilizers. When repair of comminuted coronoid fractures is not possible, prosthetic replacement may restore elbow stability. A coronoid prosthesis has been designed with an extended tip in an effort to augment elbow stability in the setting of residual collateral ligament insufficiency. The purpose of this biomechanical study, therefore, was to compare an anatomic coronoid replacement with an extended tip implant both with and without ligament insufficiency.

Purpose

The remplissage procedure may be performed as an adjunct to Bankart repair to address an engaging Hill-Sachs defect. Clinically, it has been reported that the remplissage procedure improves joint stability but that it may also restrict shoulder range of motion. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to examine the effects of the remplissage procedure on shoulder motion and stability. We hypothesized that the remplissage procedure would improve stability and prevent engagement but may have a deleterious effect on motion.

Purpose

There have been a number of described techniques for sizing the diameter of radial head implants. All of these techniques, however, are dependent on measurements of the excised native radial head. When accurate sizing is not possible due to extensive comminution or due to a previous radial head excision, it has been postulated that the proximal radioulnar joint (PRUJ) may be used as an intraoperative landmark for correct sizing. The purpose of this study was to: 1) determine if the PRUJ could be used as a reliable landmark for radial head implant diameter sizing when the native radial head in unavailable, and (2) determine the reliability of measurements of the excised radial head.

Purpose

The remplissage technique of insetting the infraspinatus tendon and posterior joint capsule into an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion has gained in popularity. However, a standardized technique for suture anchor and suture placement has not been defined for this novel procedure. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to compare three remplissage techniques by evaluating their effects on joint stiffness and motion.

Purpose

The coronoid process is an integral component for elbow stability. In the setting of a comminuted coronoid fracture, where repair is not possible, a prosthetic device may be beneficial in restoring elbow stability. The hypothesis of this in-vitro biomechanical study was that an anatomic coronoid prosthesis would restore stability to the coronoid deficient elbow.

Purpose

Capitellum hemiarthroplasty is an emerging concept. The current metallic capitellar implants have spherical surface shapes, but the native capitellum is not spherical. This study evaluated the effect of capitellar implant shape on the contact mechanics of the radiocapitellar joint when articulating with the native radial head.

Purpose: Glenoid component loosening is a common reason for failed total shoulder arthroplasty. Multiple factors have been suggested as causes for component loosening including asymmetric loading of the glenoid prosthesis by the humeral head (rocking horse phenomenon). A novel technique was employed to measure in-vitro strain in the subchondral bone adjacent to a cemented all polyethylene pegged glenoid prosthesis. The purpose of the study was to develop and validate a testing protocol to investigate load transfer in the polyethylene glenoid implant and bone construct.

Method: Eight polyethylene components were implanted using standard cementing techniques in eight cadaveric specimens. Loading was performed with a pneumatic actuator capable of applying loads at various angles. A dynamic 10 N/s force was applied for a total of 15 seconds producing a maximum force of 150N at angles of 0, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50o. Strain gauges were placed around the implant 1mm proximal to the bone-cement interface at the four quadrants. The humeral head was simulated with a custom steel ball with a non-conforming diameter in relation to the prosthesis that is typical in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Results: During pure compressive loading, tension was observed in the superior and inferior quadrants of the glenoid. Superior and inferior loading caused increasing same side (ipsilateral) tension, occurring from 0 to 30o and 0 to 20o, respectively. Compression was recorded superiorly when loading was applied at 40o and 50o in the superior direction while contralateral tension was recorded in the inferior gauges. Strain measurements were less consistent in the anterior and posterior glenoid quadrants and varied between tension and compression.

Conclusion: Tension measurements in the ipsilateral direction at lower angles were unexpected. This observation differs from the previous assumption that applied loads at relatively perpendicular angles to the implant should dissipate as compression. Tension at the bone cement interface is unfavorable. The identification of tension in some quadrants of the implant in this study, therefore, may have revealed a mechanism of implant loosening. Our data support the previously described rocking horse phenomena and also illustrate a new umbrella type effect of polyethylene flexure, which causes the periphery of the glenoid implant to flex upwards superiorly and inferiorly. These findings have the potential to influence future designs of total shoulder arthroplasty perhaps leading to increased implant survival.

Purpose: Blocking screws placed adjacent to intramedullary nails supplement fixation in long bone fractures with a short proximal or distal segment. Clinically, blocking screws are placed using fluoroscopy, resulting in variability in screw placement. The clinical significance of the accuracy of screw placement is unknown. Recently, a targeted blocking screw device was developed, enabling precise placement of screws adjacent to the nail. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical effects of locking screws (LS) and targeted (TBS) and non-targeted blocking screws (NBS) in distal femur fractures.

Method: Sawbone^® femurs were used to create a fracture model. Femoral sawbone specimens were osteotomized eight cm proximal to the knee joint and a two cm gap was created. Intramedullary nails were used for stabilization, including one proximal locking screw and varying the distal screw configuration for study purposes. Targeted blocking screws were inserted directly adjacent to the intramedullary device using the commercially-available targeting device. Non-targeted screws were inserted one screw diameter medial or lateral to the “ideal” position. Four study groups were created; group one consisted of TBS and two distal LS. Group two had TBS and one LS. Group three had NBS and two LS, and group four consisted of NBS and one LS. Specimens were subjected to a cyclic compression protocol along the mechanical axis of the femur. Applied load varied from 100 to 700 N in 100 N incremental staircase loading protocol. Load-displacement curves recorded construct stiffness. Fracture gap motion was measured with electronic calipers.

Results: Targeted constructs were stiffer at all load levels, and 10% stiffer overall. Differences were statistically significant at moderate load levels (Group one vs three, 400N and 500N, p< 0.05).

Conclusion: Targeted constructs were stiffer at all load levels despite Sawbones^® undergoing significant deformation at the proximal femur, masking the relatively smaller differences in motion at the fracture site. A difference in sagittal motion was found between groups with one and two LS, independent of the position of blocking screws. In conclusion, targeted blocking screw constructs were stiffer at all load levels compared to non-targeted constructs. The number of LS was a factor in sagittal plane stability. This study suggests that using targeted blocking screws in distal femur fractures may reduce fracture motion and decrease post operative malalignment.

Purpose: Loosening of glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty is a common clinical problem which can necessitate revision surgery. The mechanism of loosening is poorly understood and may relate to implant design, component fixation techniques, and interfacial tensile stresses. We are unaware of any studies that have examined the fundamental aspects of load transfer to bone for various joint loading configurations. Hence, the objective of this study was to investigate the effect of joint loading on bone strain adjacent to a poly-ethylene glenoid implant.

Method: Five specimens (4 males; avg age: 59.5 yrs) implanted with a cemented, all polyethylene component (Anatomical Shoulder; Zimmer) were tested using an apparatus capable of producing loading vectors with various angles, magnitudes and directions. Each specimen was tested using a ramp load of 0–150 N (at 10N/sec) in two directions (superior and inferior) and with six angles of load application. A uniaxial strain gauge was placed in each of the four quadrants of the glenoid, approximately 1 mm medial to the glenoid rim. The primary axis of each strain gauge was oriented medio-laterally to record bone strains. The humeral head was simulated by a custom steel ball with a radius of curvature consistent with a nonconforming humeral prosthesis.

Results: The relationship between strain and applied force was not linear (superior quadrant at 40o: linear fit R2=0.96; quadratic fit R2=0.999; p< 0.0005), and was dependent on the loading angle. During pure compressive loading, tension was observed in the superior and inferior quadrants of the glenoid; while less consistent results in the anterior and posterior quadrants revealed variable tension and compression. Superior and inferior loading each caused increasing ipsilateral tension, occurring from 0–30o and 0–20o, respectively.

Conclusion: The current study is thought to be the first to directly measure load transfer at the implant-bone interface. We demonstrated load transfer nonlinearities between a surgically implanted glenoid component and the underlying bone in all locations and for a wide range of loading conditions. This has important implications towards the modeling of these constructs using finite element analyses. The results also illustrate tensile loading during compressive and small eccentricity loading cases. These results suggest a polyethylene flexure, causing the periphery of the glenoid implant to flex upwards placing the cement mantle and underlying bone in tension. Tensile loads that are linked to cement mantle fracture and implant loosening are produced under loading conditions associated with activities of daily living. This study has provided insight into the mechanisms of load transfer between a cemented polyethylene glenoid implant and the underlying bone. Reduction or elimination of these interfacial tensile stresses around the glenoid periphery should be considered when developing novel methods for component fixation.

Purpose: Techniques to quantify soft-tissue forces in the upper extremity are not well described. Consequently, ligament forces of the elbow joint have not been reported. Knowledge of the magnitudes of tension of the primary valgus stabilizer, the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (AMCL), would allow for an improved understanding of the load bourne by the ligament. The purpose of this in vitro study was to quantify the magnitude of tension in the native AMCL throughout flexion with the arm in the valgus orientation. We hypothesized that tension in the AMCL would increase with flexion.

Method: Five fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities (mean age 72 ± 10 years) were tested. To produce active muscle loading in a motion simulator, cables were affixed to the distal tendons of the brachialis, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, and brachioradialis and attached to actuators. The wrist was fixed in neutral flexion/extension and the forearm in neutral rotation. The arm was orientated in the valgus gravity-loaded position. A custom designed ligament load transducer was inserted into the AMCL. Active simulated flexion was achieved via computer-controlled actuation while passive elbow flexion was achieved by an investigator manually guiding the arm through flexion. Motion of the ulna relative to the humerus was measured using a tracking device.

Results: Both the active and passive motion pathways showed an increase in AMCL tension with increasing angles of elbow flexion (p < 0.05). There was no difference in AMCL tension levels between active and passive elbow flexion (p = 0.20). The mean maximum tension achieved was 97±33N and 94±40 N for active and passive testing respectively.

Conclusion: AMCL tension levels were observed to increase with elbow flexion, indicating that other structures (such as the joint capsule and the shape of the articulation) are likely more responsible for joint stability near full extension, and that the AMCL is recruited at increased angles of elbow flexion. With respect to load magnitudes, Regan et al. found the maximum load to failure of the AMCL was 261 N, while Armstrong et al. reported a failure load of 143 N in cyclic testing. The maximum AMCL tension level observed in this study was 160 N. Failure of the AMCL was not observed, which may be due to differences in specimen size, age, or the method of load application. In summary, this in vitro cadaveric study has provided a new understanding of the magnitudes of AMCL tension through the arc of elbow flexion, and this has important implications with respect to the desired target strength of repair and reconstruction techniques. These findings will also assist in the development and validation of computational models of the elbow.

Purpose: Most displaced olecranon fractures can be treated with ORIF. However with severe comminution or bone loss, excision of the fragments and repair of the triceps to the ulna is recommended. The triceps can be reattached to either the anterior or posterior aspect of the ulna. The purpose of this in-vitro study was to determine the effect of triceps repair technique on elbow laxity and extension strength in the setting of olecranon deficiency.

Method: Eight unpreserved cadaveric arms were used (age 75 ± 11 years). Surface models were generated from CT images and sequential olecranon resections in 25% increments were performed using real-time navigation. Muscle tendons (biceps, brachialis, brachioradialis and triceps) were sutured to actuators of an elbow motion simulator, which produced active extension. A tracking system recorded kinematics in the varus and valgus positions. A triceps advancement was performed using either an anterior or posterior repair to the remaining olecranon in random order. Triceps extension strength was measured in the dependent position with the elbow flexed 90° using a force transducer located at the distal ulnar styloid, while triceps tension was increased from 25–200 N. Outcome variables included maximum varus-valgus elbow laxity and triceps extension strength. Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs were performed for laxity comparing resection level and repair method. Three-way repeated measures ANOVAs were performed for triceps extension strength comparing triceps tension, resection level and repair method. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: Progressive olecranon resection increased elbow laxity (p < 0.001). Although the posterior repair produced slightly greater laxity for all but the 50% resection, this difference was not significant (p = 0.2). The posterior repair provided greater extension strength than the anterior repair at all applied triceps tensions and for all olecranon resections (p = 0.01). The initial 0% resection reduced extension strength for both repairs (p < 0.01), however, there was no effect of progressive olecranon resections (p = 0.09).

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in laxity between the anterior and posterior repairs. Thus even for large olecranon resections, the technique of triceps repair does not have significant influence on joint stability. Extension strength was not reduced by progressive olecranon resections, perhaps due to wrapping of the triceps tendon around the trochlea putting it in-line with the ulna and giving it a constant moment arm. Triceps extension strength was higher for the posterior repair. This is likely due to the greater distance and hence moment arm of the posterior repair to the joint rotation center. Conversely, the anterior repair brings the triceps insertion closer to the joint center, reducing the moment arm. Since there was no significant difference in laxity between the repairs, the authors favour the posterior repair due to its significantly higher triceps extension strength.

Purpose: This in-vitro study examined the effect of simulated Colles fractures on load transmitted to the distal ulna, using an in-line load cell. Our hypothesis was distal radial fracture malposition will increase distal radial ulnar joint (DRUJ) load relative to the native position of the radius.

Method: Eight fresh frozen upper-extremities were mounted in a motion simulator which enabled active forearm rotation. An osteotomy was performed just proximal to the distal radioulnar joint, and a 3-degree of freedom modular appliance was implanted which simulated Colles type distal radial fracture deformities. This device allowed for accurate adjustment of dorsal angulation and translation (0, 10, 20 and 30 degrees dorsal angulation and 0, 5 and 10mm dorsal translation both isolated and in combination). A 6-DOF load cell was inserted in the distal ulna 1.5 cm proximal to the ulnar head to quantify DRUJ joint forces. Distal ulnar loading was measured following simulated distal radial deformities with both an intact and sectioned triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC).

Results: The maximum resultant transverse distal ulnar load occurred during active forearm pronation and supination. Increasing magnitudes of dorsal angulation and translation of the distal radius increased loading in the distal ulna. For pronation with the ligaments intact, the transverse resultant load for the non-fracture, native positioning was significantly lower (p< 0.05) than the majority of malpositioned cases except for the translations only (not combined with angulation). However, all fracture orientations for supination had an increased effect on the resultant loading (p< 0.05) when ligaments were intact. Greater forces were measured in the distal ulna when the TFCC intact relative to TFCC sectioning. Sectioning the TFCC eliminated the effect of fracture malposition for both pronation and supination. The range of maximum transverse force for intact pronation and supination was between 118& #61617;34N and 130& #61617;39N, respectively. Similarly, for sectioned pronation and supination, the maximum transverse forces were and 93& #61617;40N and 89& #61617;24N, respectively.

Conclusion: Malpositioning of distal radial fractures in dorsal translation and angulation was found to increase forces in the distal ulna, which may be an important source of residual pain following malunion of Colles fractures. Healing of the distal radius in an anatomic position resulted in the least forces. Sectioning the TFCC released the tethering effect of the radius on the ulna, decreasing DRUJ force. This is the first study of its kind to attempt to quantify the forces at the DRUJ as a result of Colles fractures, and these early findings provide important baseline information related to the biomechanics of the DRUJ.

Purpose: The identification of anatomical landmarks is an important aspect of joint surgery, to ensure proper placement and alignment for implants and other reconstructive procedures. At the elbow, the center of the capitellum (derived via a digitization of the surface and subsequent sphere fitting) has been well established as a key landmark to identify the axis of rotation of the joint. For some cases, and in particular minimally invasive surgery, only small regions of the capitellum may be exposed which may lead to errors in determining the centre. The purpose of this study was to identify the optimal location of digitizations of the capitellum.

Method: Twenty-five fresh frozen cadaveric distal humeri (19 left, 6 right) were studied. Using an x-ray computed tomography scanner, volumetric images of each specimen were acquired and used to reconstruct a 3-dimensional digital model of the specimen using the Visualization Toolkit (VTK). A sphere-fit algorithm was used to determine the centre of the spherical capitellum based on manually chosen (digitized) points across the 3D capitellar surface. The true geometric centre was located by digitizing points across the entire capitellar surface. Three sub-regions of the capitellum, commensurate with typical surgical approaches with minimal dissection, were then digitized. These were superior anterior lateral (SAL), inferior anterior lateral (IAL) and a combination of these two regions. These regions were compared to the true center using a 1-way Repeated Measures ANOVA with significance set to p = 0.05.

Results: Digitizations of only SAL and IAL sub-regions resulted in the largest differences relative to the true centre: SAL = 3.9±3.4 mm, IAL = 4.2±3.4 mm, (p < 0.0005). There was no difference between SAL and IAL (p = 1.0). Digitization of the combined SAL + IAL regions, while significantly different from the entire capitellum, resulted in the smallest mean difference of 0.87±0.84 mm.

Conclusion: These data show that the region of digitization affects the accuracy of predicting the capitellum centre. In a previous study by our group, we showed that an accurate determination of the centre of a sphere can be achieved with a small surface area of digitization. In the current study, the large errors that occurred when a small surface was digitized (i.e. SAL and IAL alone), are in all likelihood, due the non-spherical nature of the capitellum. In summary, while the most precise method in locating the true centre is to digitize the entire capitellar surface where possible, an alternative approach is to digitize both the superior and inferior anterior lateral regions.

Purpose: Current techniques for the investigation of elbow stability following injury or surgical interventions rely on kinematic descriptors. Typically, the motion pathways of the bones are employed to describe the effect of various clinical variables on alignment joint stability. This study describes a new approach to better visualize joint motion pathways that relates the anatomical geometry of the joint, obtained using medical imaging, with the recorded motion of the joint. The clinical aim of our study was to use this approach to investigate the effect of radial head resection and subsequent radial head arthroplasty on joint kinematics and elbow stability.

Method: Five fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were employed. Computed tomography (CT) scans of each upper extremity were obtained to create a three-dimensional model of the joint. Simulated active elbow flexion with the arm in the valgus gravity loaded position was achieved using an upper arm simulator previously developed in our laboratory. Receivers from an electromagnetic tracking device were attached to the humerus and ulna in order to record their relative motion. Sutures were secured to the tendons of relevant muscles, which were connected to servomotors and pneumatic actuators, used to simulate motion. Kinematic data was collected with the radial head intact, radial head resected and following placement of metallic radial head implant. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to detect statistical differences. After testing, each specimen was denuded of all soft tissue and disarticulated. Fiducial markers were attached to the humerus and the ulna. The joint was then re-imaged in the CT scanner to obtain a volumetric image of each fiducial. Using the kinematic data recorded during simulated motion, and the knowledge of the position of each fiducial, a direct visualization of the recorded motion, using the 3D models was obtained. The bony position was then compared to the traditional graphical kinematic analysis examining changes in valgus angulations throughout the arc of motion.

Results: We observed a close agreement between the kinematic output and the registered bony 3D models showing the joint position. Following resection of the radial head, in the valgus dependent position, there was an increase in the valgus angulation of the ulna with respect to the humerus (p< 0.05).

Conclusion: Using this visualization approach, these changes in bony alignment were readily observed and understood visually in the 3D model of the ulna. Unlike the traditional graphical approach used to investigate elbow stability, this technique allows for the representation of coupled motion (rotation) of the bones. This technique also permits direct visualization the relative position of the bones within the joint, hence improving the overall understanding of joint motion.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of serial olecranon resections on elbow stability.

Method: Eight fresh, previously frozen cadaveric arms underwent CT scanning. The specimens were mounted in an in-vitro motion simulator, and kinematic data was obtained using an electromagnetic tracking system. Simulated active and passive flexion was produced with servo-motors and pneumatic pistons attached to specific muscles. Flexion was studied in the dependent, horizontal, varus, and valgus positions. Custom computer navigation software was utilized to guide serial resection of the olecranon in 12.5% increments. A triceps advancement repair was performed following each resection.

Results: Serial olecranon resections resulted in a significant increase in valgus-varus (V-V) laxity for both passive (p< 0.001) and active (p=0.04) flexion. For passive motion this increase reached statistical significance following the 12.5% resection. This corresponded to an increase in V-V laxity of 1.4 ± 0.1o and a total laxity of 7.5 ± 1.0o. For active flexion this increase reached significance following the 62.5% resection. This corresponded to an increase in V-V laxity of 5.6 ± 1.1o and a total laxity of 11.2 ± 1.5. There was no significant effect of sequential olecranon excision on elbow kinematics or stability with the elbow in the vertical or horizontal positions. The elbows became grossly unstable after resection of greater than 75% of the olecranon.

Conclusion: A progressive increase in the varus-valgus laxity of the elbow was seen with sequential excision of the olecranon. Laxity of the elbow was increased with excision of 75% of the olecranon, likely due to the loss of the bony congruity and attachment site of the posterior band of the medial collateral ligament. Gross instability resulted when 87.5% or greater was removed, likely due to damage to the anterior band of the medial collateral ligament as it inserts on the sublime tubercle of the ulna. Rehabilitation of the elbow with the arm in the dependant position should be considered following excision of the olecranon; varus and valgus orientations should be avoided. The contribution of the olecranon to elbow stability may be even more important in patients with associated ligament injuries or fractures of the elbow.

Results: Repeatability of creating motion-based JCS was less than 1 mm and 1° in all directions. The inter-specimen standard-deviations of position and orientation measurements were smaller for the motion-based than for the anatomy-based JCS in every direction and for every specimen (p< 0.006). The ulno-humeral varus angle and internal/external rotation kinematics of active flexion showed less inter-specimen variability when calculated using motion-based JCS (p< 0.05).

Purpose: Coronal shear fractures of the humerus include the Kocher-Lorenz fracture, an osteochondral fracture of the capitellar articular surface, the Hahn-Steinthal fracture, a substantial shear fragment, extension into the trochlea, and complete involvement of the capitellum and trochlea. If the fracture proves irreparable, it is not known what the impact of fragment excision would have on the biomechanics of the elbow. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the sequential loss of the capitellum and trochlea on the kinematics and stability of the elbow.

Method: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric arms were mounted in an upper extremity joint testing system, with cables attaching the tendons of the major muscles to motors and pneumatic actuators. Electromagnetic receivers attached to the radius and ulna enabled quantification of the kinematics of both bones with respect to the humerus. The distal humeral articular surface was sequentially excised to replicate clinically relevant coronal shear fractures while leaving the collateral ligaments intact. Active flexion in both the vertical and valgus-loaded positions, and passive rotation in the vertical position was conducted for each excision.

Results: Excision of the capitellum had no effect on ulnohumeral stability or kinematics in both the vertical or valgus positions (p=1.0). Excision of the entire capitellum and trochlea led to significant valgus instability with the arm in the valgus position (p=0.01), while excision of the lateral trochlea led to increased valgus instability with pronated flexion in the valgus position (p=0.049). Progressive loss of the articular surface led to posterior, inferior, and medial displacement of the radial head with respect to the capitellum and increased external rotation of the ulna with respect to the humerus in the vertical position (p< 0.05).

Conclusion: Excision of the capitellum did not result in valgus or rotational instability, while excision of the trochlea resulted in multiplanar instability. The radial head displaced medially because it is constrained to the ulna by the annular ligament, and the ulna pivoted into valgus and external rotation on the residual trochlea and medial collateral ligament. In patients with coronal shear fractures, the trochlea must be reconstructed to prevent instability and the potential for secondary degenerative change.

Purpose: Aseptic loosening is one of the leading causes of failure in total elbow arthroplasty. It is logical to postulate that incorrect implant positioning and alignment may lead to excessive loading and wear which can induce the loosening cascade. However, the effect of implant malalignment on wear inducing loads in the elbow is not yet known. This in-vitro study determined the effect of anterior malpositioning, and varus-valgus (VV) and internal-external (IE) malrotations on humeral stem loading in total elbow arthroplasty.

Method: The humeral, ulnar, and radial components of a linked total elbow arthroplasty were optimally positioned using computer navigation in eight cadaveric elbows, mounted in a load/motion control elbow simulator (age 75yrs, range 42–93; 5 male). A modular, humeral component was employed to generate implant malpositioning errors of ±6° VV, ±8° IE, and 5mm anterior. The implant was instrumented with strain gauges to quantify VV and IE bending loads during elbow flexion with the forearm in supination. Load output was combined using a sum-of-squares technique. Passive flexion was performed with the arm in the varus and valgus orientations; passive and active flexion were performed with the arm in the vertical orientation.

Results: With the arm (humerus) in the vertical orientation, bending loads increased between 418Nmm and 1618Nmm for all malaligned implant positions (p< 0.05). Passive flexion (1354±859Nmm) produced higher resultant loads for the optimally positioned implant than active (819±891Nmm) flexion (p< 0.05). Although it varied during flexion, loading with the arm in varus (2928±1273Nmm) or valgus (2494±743Nmm) orientations resulted in up to a three-fold increase in loading when compared to the vertical orientation (p< 0.01).

Conclusion: These data demonstrate that humeral component malpositioning increases loading in the implant, however further studies are required to determine the long term effect on polyethylene wear and component loosening. Prosthesis designs that replicate the native flexion-extension axis and make use of sophisticated instrumentation or computer assistance to achieve precise positioning during implantation should lead to improved arthroplasty durability. Also, loading was higher with the arm in varus or valgus orientations, suggesting that patients should avoid activities post-operatively that require their elbow to be positioned in this way.

Purpose: Ligaments and osseous constraints are the only static stabilizers in a healthy elbow. Following arthroplasty, the use of semi-constrained, or linked, implants provides a potential third static stabilizer. However, this constraint may increase loading on the prosthesis, and hence accelerate polyethylene wear. The presence of competent collateral ligaments and the radial head would be expected to improve elbow stability and decrease loading on the ulnohumeral articulation. This in vitro study determined the effects of the collateral ligaments, radial head, and implant linkage on kinematics and wear-inducing loads in total elbow arthroplasty.

Method: Eight cadaveric upper extremities (age 73.5yrs; 5 male), were tested using an elbow motion simulator. Humeral, ulnar, and radial components of an elbow arthroplasty were positioned using a computer-assisted technique. Varus-valgus and internal-external bending loads were measured during flexion using an instrumented humeral component. A tracking receiver attached to the ulna recorded its position during active and passive flexion in the vertical orientation, and passive flexion in the varus and valgus orientations. Kinematics and loading were measured with and without implant linkage, with an intact, resected and replaced radial head, and before and after sectioning of the collateral ligaments.

Results: There were no differences in the bending loads with the arm in the vertical orientation regardless of the status of the ligaments, radial head or implant linkage (p> 0.2). Radial head excision produced an increase in valgus angulation of the ulna (6.7±6.4°) but did not influence bending loads in the vertical orientation (p< 0.05). Loading was lowest with the unlinked implant, and with ligaments and radial head intact, with the arm in the valgus (1065±466Nmm) (p< 0.01) and varus (1333±698Nmm) (p< 0.05) orientations.

Conclusion: Our results show that the radial head is an important valgus stabilizer for the prosthesis employed in this investigation. Linkage of the articulation increases implant loading during passive flexion with the arm in the varus and valgus orientations, which may increase implant wear. This suggests that, when using prostheses of this design, linkage of the articulation may be unnecessary if adequate bone stock and ligaments are available, whilst preserving or repairing the collateral ligaments and preserving or replacing the radial head.