The aim of this study was to describe a quantitative 3D CT method to measure rotator cuff muscle volume, atrophy, and balance in healthy controls and in three pathological shoulder cohorts. In all, 102 CT scans were included in the analysis: 46 healthy, 21 cuff tear arthropathy (CTA), 18 irreparable rotator cuff tear (IRCT), and 17 primary osteoarthritis (OA). The four rotator cuff muscles were manually segmented and their volume, including intramuscular fat, was calculated. The normalized volume (NV) of each muscle was calculated by dividing muscle volume to the patient’s scapular bone volume. Muscle volume and percentage of muscle atrophy were compared between muscles and between cohorts.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of different treatment options for glenoid loosening following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) at a minimum follow-up of two years. We retrospectively studied the records of 79 patients (19 men, 60 women; 84 shoulders) aged 70.4 years (21 to 87) treated for aseptic loosening of the glenosphere following RSA. Clinical evaluation included pre- and post-treatment active anterior elevation (AAE), external rotation, and Constant score.Aims
Patients and Methods
Bony healing of tuberosities around shoulder prostheses is difficult to obtain in the elderly patient. We hypothesized that reattachment of the tuberosities, performed in combination with bone grafting, around a specific reverse shoulder fracture-prosthesis (RSFP) would favour improved tuberosity healing and shoulder mobility in elderly patients with displaced proximal humerus fractures. We included 49 patients (50 shoulders)(45 female, 4 male) in this prospective study. Mean (± SD) age 80 ± 4 years (range, 70–88). Clinical evaluation consisted of ROM, VAS (pain), Constant scores, patient satisfaction (Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV)) and noted complications. Radiological evaluation consisted of tuberosity healing and component loosening. Mean follow-up 18 ± 8 months (12–39).BACKGROUND:
METHODS:
to analyze the survivorship of the RSA with a minimum 10 years follow up. Between 1992 and 1999, 145 Delta (DePuy) RSAs have been implanted in 138 patients. It was a mulicentric study. Initial etiologies were gathered as following: group A (92 cases) Cuff tear arthropaties (CTA), osteoarthritis (OA) with at least 2 involved cuff tendons, and massive cuff tear with pseudoparalysis (MCT); group B (39 cases) -failed hemiarthroplasties (HA), failed total shoulder arthroplasties (TSA), and fracture sequelae; and group C (14 cases) rheumatoid arthritis, fractures, tumor, and instability. Survival curves were established with the Kaplan-Meier technique. Two end-points were retained: -implant revision, defined by glenoid or humeral replacement or removal, or conversion to HA; - a poor clinical outcome defined by an absolute Constant score of less than 30.Purpose
Patients and Methods
In the presence of tendons lesser bony wear is seen at the acromion (acetabularisation, (p<
0.005), the glenoid (superomedial wear p=0.005) as well as the humeral head (femoralization, p=0.002). The radiological classifications according to Hamada and Favard seem not to be as appropriate to reflect accurately the location and extent of the tendino-muscular degeneration as the acromial acetabularization and humeral sphericity. The acromio-humeral distance is a good indicator for the location and the extend of the cuff tear arthropathy. A smaller acromio-humeral distance (95% CI: 4mm + 1) is only present if the postero-superior muscles are fatty degenerated (Goutallier stade III &
IV) and a larger distance is calculated (95% CI: 7mm + 3) when only the antero-superior muscles are diseased. The coracoid tip in cuff tear arthropathy-patients is almost always positioned in the inferior half of the glenoid (84%). A bigger supero-inferior distance of the glenoid in relation to the radius of the humeral head indicates more structural destruction of rotator cuff status (tendinous and muscular) and a worse clinical outcome.
Scapular notching is of concern in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and has been suggested as a cause of glenoid loosening. Our purpose was to analyze in a large series the characteristics and the consequences of the notch and then to enlighten the causes in order to seek some solutions to avoid it. 430 consecutive patients (457 shoulders) were treated by a reverse prosthesis for various etiologies between 1991 and 2003 and analyzed for this retrospective multicenter study. Adequate evaluation of the notch was available in 337 shoulders with a follow-up of 47 months (range, 24–120 months). The notch has been diagnosed in 62% cases at the last follow-up. Intermediate reviews show that the notch is already visible within the first postoperative year in 82% of these cases. Frequency and grade extension of the notch increase significantly with follow-up (p<
0.0001) but notch, when present, is not always evolutive. At this point of follow-up, scapular notch is not correlated with clinical outcome. There is a correlation with humeral radiolucent lines, particularly in metaphyseal zones (p=0.005) and with glenoid radiolucent lines around the fixation screws (p=0.006). Significant preoperative factors are: cuff tear arthropathy (p=0.0004), muscular fatty infiltration of infraspinatus (p=0.01), narrowing of acromio-humeral distance (p<
0.0001) and superior erosion of the glenoid (p=0.006). It was more frequent with superolateral approach than with deltopectoral approach (p<
0.0001) and with standard cup than with lateralized cup (p=0.02). We conclude that scapular notching is frequent, early and sometimes evolutive but not unavoidable. Preoperative superior glenoid erosion is significantly associated with a scapular notch, possibly due to the surgical tendency to position the baseplate with superior tilt and/or in high position which has been demonstrated to be an impingement factor. Preoperative radiographic planning and adapted glenoid preparation are of concern.
Over the long term, the results of the insertion of a Grammont inverted shoulder prothesis are unknown. The present study reports survivorship curves and the role of the initial aetiology in patients re-examined after 5 to 10 years.
At the time of follow-up, 18 patients had died and 2 could not be traced. The remaining patients (57 representing 60 prostheses) were seen by an independent examiner. The minimum follow-up was 5 years. The average follow-up was 69,6 months. Kaplan-Meir survivorship curves for the 60 prostheses were established in order to show the probability of failure as defined by: revision of the prothesis, glenoid loosening, and a functional level<
30 points according to the Constant score.
- for non revision of the prosthesis at 10 years: 91% overall; after 9 years: 95% for MCTA, and 77 % for the others aetiologies. This difference was statistically significant (p<
0,01) ; 6 implants were revised: 3 for MCTA and 3 for other aetiologies. - for non glenoid loosening at 10 years: 84 % overall ; after 7 years: 91% for MCTA and 77% for other aetiologies. This difference was statistically significant (p<
0,05). In addition to the cases of replaced implants mentioned above there was a case of glenoid loosening after 8 years follow-up in a patient aged 92. -for Constant score <
30 at 10 years: 58 % overall. The punctual survivorship rate was significantly different in function of the aetiology, at 6 years ; but this was no longer the case after 7 years.
According to revision of the prosthesis, there is a clear rupture in the survivorship curve about 3 years after insertion in aetiologies other than MCTA. This suggests that Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty is not appropriate in these aetiologies (particularly in cases of rheumatoid arthritis). According to Constant score <
30, there is a clear rupture in the survivorship curve about 7 years after insertion specially in MCTA cases. This suggests that inverted protheses should be used only in cases with severe handicap and only in patients aged over 75.
Functional outcome: Sixty-six patients were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 45 months. All implantations except one were performed to achieve pain relief. The absolute Constant score improved by 20 points (from 25 to 46) with a 7-point gain for pain (3 to 10), a 20° gain for active elevation, an 18° gain for external rotation, and a 0.4 point gain for force. Pain relief was greater with total prostheses. Only five patients stated they were dissatis-fied with the outcome despite the fact that 18 reported significant persistent pain. The Constant score was analysed as a function of follow-up, size of the humeral head, and preoperative morphology of the glenoid surface. Radiological outcome: Certain loosening was recognised for one glenoid and one humeral stem. Among 52 shoulders with strictly identical radiological results, 33 exhibited deterioration either for the vault or the glenoid or both, with no effect on the Constant score.
The differences between the hemi- and inverted arthroplasty groups concerned the Constant score, which was significantly better in the inverted prostheses (65.5) than in the hemiarthroplasties (46.1), for all subscores. Active elevation was 138° for the inverted prostheses and 97° for the Aequalis prostheses (p <
0.01). Mean external rotation in position 1 was 22° for the Aequalis prostheses and 11° for the inverted prostheses (p <
0.01) with no difference in elevation rotation. These results remained equivalent and significant over time, even beyond five years. Radiographically, there was one case with an anomalous humeral component (impaction) in the inverted group. For the inverted prostheses, there were three migrations that have not been revised to date and three partial screw loosenings. The main problem was the development of notches in the scapular column observed in 50% of the cases including 20% which reached the lower screw. For the Aequalis prostheses, the main problem was deterioration of the acromial vault observed in 50% of the cases leading to altered function.