Growing rods are used in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis. The aim of this technique is to achieve deformity correction while maintaining spinal growth. Gradual stiffening or spontaneous fusion of the spine can interfere with the ability to lengthen. Furthermore, diminished acquired length with serial distraction is common and needs to be evaluated and quantified. The purpose of this prospective study was to measure the forces and amount of distraction over time in patients with early-onset scoliosis treated with growing rods. Distraction forces were measured prospectively during 60 consecutive lengthening procedures in 26 patients. All patients had single submuscular rod constructs with side-to-side connectors. For every measurement, output from a transducer on a dedicated pair of distraction calipers was recorded at zero load status, and the force was then recorded at every 1 mm lengthening; length was obtained at each event and was recorded in millimeters.Introduction
Methods
Stress concentration in the annulus was calculated by subtracting the nuclear pressure from the maximum stress in the annulus. Neural arch compressive load was obtained by subtracting the disc compressive force, calculated by integrating intradiscal stress over area, from the applied 1.5kN (
Recent years have seen the popularization of minimally invasive approaches to the spine. However, the use of the balloon assisted retroperitoneal approach has not been widely described, moreover there has been no direct comparison between this mini-ALIF (anterior lumbar interbody fusion) and the conventional open method in the literature. Comparison of peri and intra-operative parameters between the rnini-ALIF (using the balloon assisted dissector and Synframe retractor system) and the open midline approach for single and double level anterior lumbar interbody fusions in order to assess the efficacy of this procedure. An independent retrospective evaluation of 35 patients who underwent single or double level ALIF under the care of the senior author at the University Hospital, Nottingham during the period from 1997 to 2000. The patients were split between those undergoing a mini-ALIF (balloon assisted retroperitoneal dissection) or the conventional approach via a larger midline incision. The groups were matched for age, sex and number of levels. Data was collated from the medical notes with regards to intra-operative blood loss, operative time, intra-operative complications, PCA requirements, time to mobilisation and length of hospital stay. A statistically significant (p=0. 01) reduction in time to mobilisation (mean 2. 1 days vs 3. 9 days) and operative time (mean 175mins vs 265mins) was found for the single level mini-ALIF. This reflects the greater number of L5/SI fusions in this group. The number of vascular injuries was also greater in the approach to L4/5. No difference was found between the two groups for double level procedures. The immediate advantages of a less invasive approach both to the patient and hospital do not appear to be borne out by this study. Cosmesis was not assessed and the long term functional outcome awaits later confirmation.
Numerous studies have examined the biomechanical properties of the vertebral body following PMMA cement augmentation for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures. To date there is no published literature reporting the effects of Vertebroplasty on internal intervertebral disc biomechanics which in turn have been shown to reflect loading patterns of the vertebral column. To study effects of PMMA cement augmentation of vertebral body fractures on intervertebral disc biomechanics using stress prolifometry to assess differential anterior and posterior vertebral column loading. Eight cadaveric motion segments were individually loaded on a hydraulically powered materials testing machine under 1.5kN of axial compression. Following fracture induction the lower vertebral body underwent Vertebroplasty. Profiles of the vertically acting compressive stress were obtained by pulling a pressure sensitive transducer along the mid-sagittal diameter of the intervertebral disc. “Stress profile” measurements were obtained before fracture, following fracture, and after vertebro-plasty both in extension and flexion. Stress profiles were integrated over area to calculate the compressive force across the disc. The compressive load acting on the neural arch was calculated by subtracting the disc force from the applied 1.5kN load. In flexed postures posterior column loading increased from 17.1% to 42.2% following fracture (p<
0.01) and then decreased significantly from 42.2% to 23.68% following vertebroplasty (p<
0.03). There was no significant difference between pre-fracture and post-vertebroplasty status (p=0.11). In extended posture, fracture produced increased posterior column loading 72.9% vs 51.8% (p<
0.005) and following vertebroplasty there was no significant change (p=0.2). In moderate degrees of flexion, vertebroplasty produces normalisation of load bearing through the anterior vertebral column and hence offloads the posterior elements to a significant degree. This could be postulated, to partly account for the analgesic effect seen following vertebroplasty in the clinical setting.
Conclusion: The immediate advantages of a less invasive approach both to the patient and the hospital do not appear to be borne out by this study. Cosmesis was not assessed and long term functional outcome awaits later review.
Advances in laparoscopic technology have popularised minimally invasive approaches to the anterior lumbar spine. The use of the balloon assisted retroperitoneal approach however has not been widely described; moreover there has been no direct comparison between this mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and the conventional open method in the literature. Comparison of peri and intra-operative parameters between the mini-ALIF (using the balloon assisted dissector) and the open midline approach for single and double level anterior lumbar interbody fusions in order to assess the efficacy of this procedure. An independent retrospective evaluation of 35 patients who underwent single or double level ALIF. A single surgeon at the University Hospital, Nottingham, performed the procedures during the period from 1997 to 2000. The patients were split between those undergoing a mini-ALIF (balloon assisted retroperitoneal dissection) and the conventional approach via a larger midline incision. The groups were matched for age, sex and number of levels. Data was collated from the medical notes with regards to intra-operative blood loss, operative time, intra-operative complications, Patient Controlled Analgesic (PCA) requirements, time to mobilisation and length of hospital stay. A statistically significant reduction in operative time (mean 178mins Vs 255mins) and time to mobilisation (mean 2.2 days Vs 3.7days) was found for the single level mini-ALIF. No other significant difference was detected for the other criteria between the two groups for either single or double level procedures. Complications in the form of vascular injuries were almost equal in both groups. Although operating time was significantly shortened using the balloon-assisted dissector other perioperative parameters were not. The question of cosmesis of the surgical scar was not explored in this study, this may have been more favorable in the mini-ALIF group but given the above results one must question whether the added expense of this innovative device is justified when there was no detected difference in all other measured criteria.