Abstract

Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) in the presence of femoral defects can be technically challenging. Reconstruction with long stems is widely accepted as the standard. However long stems can be difficult to insert and can compromise distal bone stock for future revisions. The aims of this study were to identify whether there was a difference in survival and outcomes following rTHA using a long versus standard or short femoral stem.

A comprehensive systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Chochrane Library and Web of Science databases. Inclusion criteria were (i) adult patients >18 years; (ii) randomised controlled trials, joint registry, or cohort studies; (iii) single or staged rTHA for Paprosky 1–3B femoral defects. Exclusion criteria were (i) mixed reporting without subgroup analysis for revision stem length; (ii) ex-vivo studies. Screening for eligibility and assessment of studies was performed by the authors.

Out of 341 records, 9 studies met criteria for analysis (including 1 study utilising joint registry data and 1 randomised controlled trial). Across studies there were 3102 rTHAs performed in 2982 patients with a mean age of 67.4 years and a male: female ratio of 0.93. Revision prostheses were long-stemmed in 1727 cases and short or standard in 1375 cases with a mean follow up of 5 years (range, 0-15 years). On subgroup analysis the use of a long cemented stem compared to a long cementless prosthesis was associated with fewer complications and periprosthetic fracture in older patients. Survivorship was 95% with short stems compared to 84% with long stems at 5 years.

Moderate quality evidence suggests that in rTHA with Paprosky type 1-3B femoral defects, the use of a short or standard stem can achieve comparable outcomes to long stems with fewer significant complications and revisions. Using a shorter stem may yield a more straightforward surgical technique and can preserve distal bone stock for future revision.

Aim of the study: To assess the results of the uncemented oblong shaped Bofor cup in acetabular revision.

Methods & materials: A prospective study from January 2001 to July 2006.15 cases of acetabular revision in 14 patients is studied. Paprosky classification for the acetabular defects is used. Final outcome assessed clinically and radiologically. Both Harris hip and Oxford hip functional scoring is used to assess the patients. None of the cases are lost in follow up.

Results: The average follow-up was 36 months (range 8–52 months). All the cases were of aseptic loosening. 1case of type 2a, 6 cases of type 2b, 5 cases of type 2c, 3cases of type 3 defect and 4 cases with medial wall defect were noted. Stem was revised in 8 cases.

In 4 cases auto graft from iliac crest was used. allograft was not used in any cases. In 12 cases 15 degree hooded insert was used. Average HHS improved from 30 points (range 20–38) to 84 points (range 70–90). Average OHS improved from 24 points (range 18–40) to 82 points (range 74–92). There were no cases of dislocation& infection.1 patient had sciatic nerve neuropraxia.1 case of severe Ankylosing spondylitis failed which was revised.

Conclusion: Assemytical shape and design of the Boforcup makes it an useful cup for segmental and cavitatory acetabular defects. Pre operative classification of acetabular defects is inconsistent and unreliable. Allograft usage is not essential for these defects.

Hydroxyapatite-coated acetabular cup were used in revision hip arthroplasty without using bone grafts or bone substitutes to achieve osseointegration in 30 consecutive hips (29 patients). The mean age was 72.5 years (range 54 to 88). Primary prosthesis was 14 Charnley’s, 12 Capital 3M, one Furlong, one Exeter and one MacKee Farrar. Indication for revision was aseptic loosening in 20, recurrent dislocation in four, periprosthetic fracture in two, prosthesis fracture in one, and three infected hips.

Patients were assessed clinically using Harris Hip Score, satisfaction questionnaire and quality of life SF 36 questionnaire, and radiologically using DeLee and Charnley, Harris-Barrack, and Hodgkinson’s Engh’s classification, and Bassetlaw Digital Scoring System (BDSS) that we have devised. The acetabular defects were assessed preoperatively using the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) classification.

Mean follow up was 38.7 months (range 18.5–76.4). Ninety present of acetabular cups had preoperative radiolucency in all DeLee and Charnley’s zones. 26 hips (87%) had no superior or lateral cup migration. Two hips had 3 mm superior migration at one year then remained stable. Mean improvement of Harris hip score was 42.2. 83.3% of hips had no or slight pain at final follow up.

Five patients had dislocations one of which was recurrent that required acetabular cup revision. Two patients had postoperative foot drop that recovered fully. Two patients had postoperative wound infection that healed with antibiotics apart from one who died due to multi-organ failure. Four patients died due to unrelated causes.

Postoperative radiographs showed stable fixation of all acetabular cups. 83.3% of hips had no or slight pain at final follow up.

Early results show that stable fixation in revision hip surgery can be obtained with HAC acetabular cups without bone grafts or bony substitute.

We reviewed 35 patients who underwent a medial unicondylar knee replacement, with an average follow up of 4 years (for functional assessment). All patents had a weight bearing AP and lateral X rays and were clinically assessed using Hospital for Special surgery score, Bristol Knee Score and SF 36 health assessment form. Five angles were measured on the x-rays to assess the alignment of the tibial and femoral alignment. There was a significant relation between the femoral component varus/valgus angle and three sub scores (fixed flexion contracture, maximum valgus/varus and range of movement) in Bristol Knee scores. The best functional out come correlated with femoral components of 4–8 degrees of valgus.

We report 10 cases of supracondylar periprotheitc fractures following TKR; all were treated using a retrograde intramedualry nailing. There were 7 females and 3 males, the mean age at surgery was 76 years (range from 68–85). The average time since the primary TKR to surgery was 5.3 years (range 2–9.4). All patients had locked intramedualry nail, and knee was immobilized in a splint for few months post op. Partial weight bearing was started 2 weeks post op. There was no intraoperative complication. One patient had superficial infection, which was treated by IV antibiotics. There was no cases of septic arthritis.

One patient was lost for follow up and one patient died from myocardial infarction 8 months post op.

Eight patients were reviewed and assessed clinically and radiologicaly. The average range of movement in the knee was 97 (range 75–110) and all patient achieved clinical and radiological healing.

To ascertain the effect of the site and number of loose bodies on the functional outcome of Outerbridge-Kashiwagi (O-K) procedure in management of osteoarthritis of the elbow.

12 patients were reviewed after having O-K procedure, and assessed using Mayo Elbow Performance score, and radiographs assessed using Derby Elbow Osteoarthritis Radiography score.

There were 10 male and 2 female patients with mean age of 47 years. The mean follow up was 24 months. In 8 (66%) patients the diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis, and 4 (34%) had post-traumatic arthritis. Nine (75%) patients had osteoarthritis of the dominant elbow, and three were non-dominant. Nine patients had locking and catching symptoms. 7 patients had < 2 loose bodies, and 5 had > 2 loose bodies. 7 had anterior loose bodies alone and 5 had both anterior and posterior loose bodies.

The Mayo Elbow Performance score improved from a mean preoperative value of 51 to 85 points postoperatively (p< 0.0001). There were 3 excellent, 7 good, 2 fair, and no poor results. Visual analogue pain score improved from a mean of 7.4 to 2.6 postoperatively (p< 0.001). The Derby Elbow Osteoarthritis Radiography score improved from preoperative mean of 6.5 to 5.3 postoperatively (p< 0.013). There was no significant difference between functional outcome of primary osteoarthritis and post-traumatic arthritis (p> 0.42). Number of loose bodies had no significance on the functional outcome (p> 0.39), neither did the site of the loose bodies (p> 0.44). There was no significant difference of the number of loose bodies on the overall total score of Derby Osteoarthritis Elbow Score (p> 0.2). In two patients revision had to be undertaken due to persistent locking that improved postoperatively.

The number and site of loose bodies, the type of osteoarthritis and the duration of symptoms have no significant prognostic value in predicting functional outcome