Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a localised disorder of subchondral bone and the overlying articular cartilage. The most commonly used classification systems involve arthroscopy and MRI.
To investigate the correlation between arthroscopic and MR findings in patients with OCD of the talus.
16 ankles in 14 patients with radiographically proven OCD were reviewed. Nine were male and five female. Mean age was 35yrs (range 18–64yrs). The lesions were staged independently using the Guhl
Arthroscopically there were eight stable and eight unstable lesions. Of the eight stable lesions, MRI staged five as stable and three as unstable. Of the eight unstable lesions, MRI staged six as unstable and two as stable. This gives a sensitivity of diagnosing unstable lesions as 0.75, with a specificity of 0.63.
This small study demonstrates that MR scans may have some limitations in classifying OCD lesions of the talus. Possible explanations are discussed. We propose that MRI findings, of OCD of the talus, should not be taken in isolation, but correlated with the patients symptoms and signs to avoid unnecessary arthroscopy.
Introduction: We performed a prospective double blind randomised clinical trial to measure the effect of pre-operative infiltration of local anaesthetic around arthroscopy wounds compared to post-operative infiltration on post operative pain relief. The underlying clinical principle is for therapeutic intervention to be made in advance of the pain rather than as a reaction to it. Methods: 36 patients undergoing daycase unilateral knee arthroscopy between October 2000 and March 2001 were studied. The pre-operative group had 10ml 0.25% bupivicaine infiltrated around the arthroscopy portal site following induction of general anaesthesia (G.A.), the postoperative group received 10ml 0.25% bupivicaine after the procedure but before reversal of the G.A. Pain was assessed using a 10cm Visual Analogue Score (VAS) at pre-operative, 1, 2 and 24 hours post operative. At each assessment the patients were blinded to the previous scores that they had submitted. Oral analgesic use in the post-operative 24 hours was also recorded.
At 1 hour post-op the mean VAS in the post-op group was 1.58 and in the pre-op group 2.59. This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.18). The mean VAS at 2 hours post-op in the pre-op, group was 1.76 compared to 1.82 in the post-op group. This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.9932). At 24 hours the pre-op group had a lower mean VAS (2.25) than the post-op group (2.4). This difference was however not statistically significant (p=0.7418). Analysis of the post-operative analgesia requirement in both groups failed no reveal a statistically significant difference (p=0.3965). Conclusion: In daycase knee arthroscopy under general anaesthesia there is no beneficial role in the use of pre-emptive local anaesthetic infiltration around the arthroscopy portal sites as compared to post-operative infiltration.