Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify if preoperative pain scores predict postoperative pain and functional outcomes in patients following rotator cuff surgery and if a threshold where increased risk occurs could be established. Establishing a risk threshold may help identify patients who need increased follow-up or rehabilitation.

Method: One hundred six subjects with rotator cuff pathology requiring operative intervention were prospectively followed. The pain subscale of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) was used as an indicator of pre-operative pain. Postoperative function one year following surgery was determined using the Simple Shoulder Test (SST). Scores with 40% or more deficit (compared to age matched controls) were classified as poor outcomes. The relative risk (RR) of poor SST scores was calculated across different cutoffs for preoperative pain scores.

Results: Having a high preoperative pain score was associated with a poor outcome following rotator cuff surgery at both the six month and one year followup. Preoperative pain scores did predict postoperative functional scores. As preoperative pain levels increased there was a higher risk of poor functional outcomes. The RR of having a poor SST at 1-year was 2.3, if preoperative pain score was greater than 35/50.

Conclusion: The current study indicates that those patients with high preoperative pain scores (> 35/50 or > 70%) are more than twice as likely to have a poor outcome following rotator cuff surgery. This should inform patients and surgeons for postoperative expectations. Whether closer follow-up, pre-rehabilitation, more intensive postoperative rehabilitation or enhanced pain management can alter this prognosis warrants investigation.

Purpose: The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has shown improvement in both pain control and function in recent studies. The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyze functional outcomes and strength in patients following the use of the Delta III prosthesis in a single center.

Method: Patients treated by one of two surgeons were prospectively evaluated following RTSA. An independent observer administered the Constant Score, SF-12, Shoulder Osteoarthritis (SOAQ), ASES, DASH questionnaires and patient satisfaction. Isometric strength testing was performed using the Powertrack II dynamometer. Follow-up for all patients was available up to 5 years following surgery.

Results: The Delta III RTSA was performed on 51 study patients (67% female, mean age 74 (SD=10)). Improvements following surgery were noted in Quality of life (SF-12 Physical Summary= 30 to 38); shoulder disability (SOAQ= 144 to 79; ASES 7 to 15; DASH= 61 to 46; Constant 21 to 56), Symptoms (SOAQ symptoms 40 to 22), Physical impairments as determined by strength (External rotation = 3 to 5 Nm, Abduction 4 to 10 Nm); and ROM (Flexion= 51 to 115°, abduction 45 to 106°); p< 0.05. All patients had follow up between 2–5 years. Satisfaction was high (86% extremely, 3% not at all).

Conclusion: Our data demonstrates significant improvements in quality of life, symptoms, patient satisfaction and disability with reduced and high at more than 2 years following RTSA. Novel to this study is improved objective evidence of strength in functional planes of motion. This is the first Canadian study to demonstrate such improvements in patients following RTSA.

Purpose: This prospective, randomized double-blinded clinical trial compared cemented fixation of the humeral component to uncemented/tissue-in-growth fixation in total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder.

Method: All patients presenting with primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder requiring replacement were screened for eligibility. Patients were randomized in the operating room after glenoid preparation to the cemented or uncemented group by a computer-generated, stratified randomization procedure. Outcome measures included disease specific QOL assessment (WOOS), SF-12, ASES, MACTAR, radiographic evaluation of component fixation, operative time, complications and revision surgery. Patients were assessed by a blinded evaluator in post-operative intervals of 2 and 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary endpoint was the WOOS score at 2 years.

Results: One hundred and sixty-one patients were consented and randomized for the study. There were 80 patients in the cemented and 81 patients in the uncemented group. At baseline, the groups were alike with regards to demographics and baseline evaluations. The WOOS scores at post-operative intervals of 12, 18 and 24 months showed a significant difference (p=0.009, 0.001, 0.028 respectively) in favour of the cemented group. The cemented group also had better strength (3 m p=0.038, 12 m p= 0.036, 18 m p=0.051, 24 m p=0.053) and forward flexion (6m p=0.031, 12 m p=0.04). As expected, the operative time was significantly less for the uncemented group (C = 2.26h +/−.63; U = 1.69h +/− 1.9, p= 0.03).

Conclusion: These findings provide the first evidence that cemented fixation of the humeral head provides better quality of life, strength and ROM than uncemented fixation. This was a Tier 1 Project of the JOINTs Canada group.

Rotator cuff tears are a common cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction. Therefore, the purpose of this in-vitro biomechanical study was conducted to determine the effects of simulated tears and subsequent repairs of the rotator cuff tendons on joint kinematics.

Eight paired fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulder specimens (mean age: 66.0 ± 8.7 years) were tested using a custom loading apparatus designed to simulate unconstrained motion of the humerus. Cables were sutured to the rotator cuff tendons and the deltoid. Loads were applied to the cables based on variable ratios of electromyographic (EMG) data and average physiological cross-sectional area (pCSA) of the muscles. An electromagnetic tracking device (Flock of Birds, Ascension Technologies, VT) was used to provide real-time feedback of abduction angle, to which the loading ratio was varied correspondingly. 2 and 4cm tears were made starting at the rotator cuff interval and extending posteriorly. Specimens were randomised to receive either single or double suture anchor repair. In order to quantify repeatability, five successive tests on each of the intact, torn, and repaired cases were performed. Statistical significance was established using One- and Two-way Repeated Measured ANOVAs (p< 0.05).

Rotator cuff tears caused alteration in glenohumeral kinematics. A 2cm tear caused the humerus to consistently move posterior through the arc of abduction; however, as the tear increased to 4cm the humerus moved anteriorly, returning towards the intact state. Double row suture anchor repairs more accurately reproduced the kinematics of the intact specimen compared to single row suture anchor repair.

The initial posterior displacement in the plane of elevation with the sectioning of the supraspinatus is related to the diminished anterior moment on the glenohumeral joint. As the tear proceeds into the infraspinatus, the anterior and posterior forces become more balanced and a return to near normal intact kinematics was observed. This study demonstrates that double row suture anchor repair more accurately reproduces active shoulder kinematics of the intact shoulder specimens.