Classification systems for tibial plateau fractures suffer from poor interobserver agreement, and their value in preoperative assessment to guide surgical fixation strategies is limited. For tibial plateau fractures four major characteristics are identified: lateral split fragment, posteromedial fragment, anterior tubercle fragment, and central zone of comminution. These fracture characteristics support preoperative assessment of fractures and guide surgical decision-making as each specific component requires a respective fixation strategy. We aimed to evaluate the additional value of 3D-printed models for the identification of tibial plateau fracture characteristics in terms of the interobserver agreement on different fracture characteristics. Preoperative images of 40 patients were randomly selected. Nine trauma surgeons, eight senior and eight junior registrars indicated the presence or absence of four fracture characteristics with and without 3D-printed models. The Fleiss kappa was used to determine interobserver agreement for fracture classification and for interpretation, the Landis and Koch criteria were used. 3D-printed models lead to a categorical improvement in interobserver agreement for three of four fracture characteristics: lateral split (Kconv = 0.445 versus K3Dprint = 0.620; P < 0.001), anterior tubercle fragment (Kconv = 0.288 versus K3Dprint = 0.449; P < 0.001) and zone of comminution (Kconv = 0.535 versus K3Dprint = 0.652; P < 0.001). The overall interobserver agreement improved for three of four fracture characteristics after the addition of 3D printed models. For two fracture characteristics, lateral split and zone of comminution, a substantial interobserver agreement was achieved. Fracture characteristics seem to be a more reliable way to assess tibial plateau fractures and one should consider including these in the preoperative assessment of tibial plateau fractures compared to the commonly used classification systems.
In contrast to the current literature, myofibroblasts are not present in chronic posttraumatic elbow contractures. However, myofibroblasts are present in the acute phase after an elbow fracture and/or dislocation. This suggests a physiological role in normal capsule healing and a potential role in the early phase of posttraumatic contracture formation. Elbow stiffness is a common complication after elbow trauma. The elbow capsule is often thickened, fibrotic and contracted upon surgical release. The limited studies available suggest that the capsule is contracted because of fibroblast to myofibroblast differentiation. However, the timeline is controversial and data on human capsules are scarce. We hypothesise that myofibroblasts are absent in normal capsules and early after acute trauma and elevated in patients with posttraumatic elbow contracture.Summary
Introduction
Quantification of Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography (Q3DCT) is a reliable and reproducible technique to quantify and characterise ankle fractures with a posterior malleolar fragment ( Fixation of posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle is subject of ongoing debate1. Fracture fixation is recommended for fragments involving 25–30% of articular surface1. However, these measurements -and this recommendation- are based on plain lateral radiographs only. A reliable and reproducible method for measurements of fragment size and articular involvement of posterior malleolar fractures has not been described. The aim of this study is to assess the inter-observer reliability of Quantification using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography (Q3DCT) –modelling2,3,4,5 for fragment size and articular involvement of posterior malleolar fractures. We hypothesize that Q3DCT-modelling for posterior malleolar fractures has good to excellent reliability.Summary
Introduction
Biomechanical studies comparing fixation constructs are predictable and do not relate to the significant clinical problems. We believe there is a need for more careful use of resources in the lab and better collaboration with surgeons to enhance clinical relevance. It is our impression that many biomechanical studies invest substantial resources studying the obvious: that open reduction and internal fixation with more and larger metal is stronger. Studies that investigate “which construct is the strongest?” are distracted from the more clinically important question of “how strong is strong enough?”. The aim of this study is to show that specific biomechanical questions do not require formal testing. This study tested our hypothesis that the outcome of a subset of peer reviewed biomechanical studies comparing fracture fixation constructs can be predicted based on common sense with great accuracy and good interobserver reliability.Summary
Introduction
posteromedial shear fracture; coronal plane fracture; lateral condylar impaction; medial condylar impaction; tibial spine involvement; separation of tibial tubercle necessitating anteroposterior lag screw fixation. In addition, fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA Comprehensive Classification of Fractures, the Schatzker classification system and the Hohl and Moore system. Two rounds of evaluation were performed and then compared. First, a combination of plain radiographs and two-dimensional computed tomography scans (2D) were evaluated, and then, four weeks later, a combination of radiographs, two-dimensional computed tomography scans, and three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography scans (3D) were assessed.
Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions also improved the average intraobserver reliability for all fracture characteristics, from κ2D = 0.624 (substantial agreement) to κ3D = 0.687 (substantial agreement). The addition of three-dimensional images had limited infiuence on the average interobserver reliability for the recognition of specific fracture characteristics (κ2D = 0.488 versus κ3D = 0.485, both moderate agreement). Three-dimensional computed tomography images improved interobserver reliability for the recognition of coronal plane fractures from fair (κ2D = 0.398) to moderate (κ3D = 0.418) but this difference was not statistically significant.
individual orthopaedic surgeons for preoperative planning (improves intraobserver reliability for the recognition of fracture characteristics), and for comparison of clinical outcomes in the orthopaedic literature (improves interobserver reliability of classification systems).
Groups were statistically comparable. No statistical differences were found in flexion extension arc (average 103 degrees, range 10 to 145 degrees), pronation supination arc (average 150 degrees, range 0 to 180 degrees) or radial ulnar deviation (average 52 degrees, range 0 to 85 degrees), as well as grip strength and osteoarthritis (all p>
0.05)