To evaluate Radiological changes in the lumbosacral spine after insertion of Wallis Ligament for Foraminal Stenosis. Thirty two Levels in Twenty Six patients were followed up with standardised radiographs after insertion of Wallis Ligaments for Foraminal Stenosis. Wallis ligaments as a top-off or those with prolapsed discs were not included. The Radiological parameters compared were Anterior and Posterior Disc height, Foraminal height and width, The inter-vertebral angle (IVA), Lumbar lordosis and Scoliosis if any. The presence of slips and their progression post-op was noted, as was bony lysis if any. There were ten males with thirteen levels and sixteen females with nineteen levels in the study. Eighteen levels (56.25%) were L4/L5, ten (31.25%) were L5/S1 and 4 (12.5%)were L3/L4. The average age in the series was 59.6 years (Range 37 – 89 yrs). Average follow up was 9.5 months (Range 2 to 36). The Average increase in Anterior disc height was 1.89 mm (+/−1.39), the posterior disc height increased by an average 1.09 mm (+/−1.14). Foraminal height increased by an average 3.85 mm (+/− 2.72), while foraminal width increased by 2.14 mm (+/− 1.38). The IVA increased in 16 and reduced in 15 patients, with no change in 1. Lumbar Lordosis increased in 23 patients, with an average value of 2.3°. No patient exhibited progression in scoliosis and no lysis could be identified. There were three Grade I slips pre-op; none progressed.Purpose
Methods and Results
We do know that the use of stand-alone cage with no plate is prone to subsidence and segmental kyphosis. Cage and plate construct are prone to adjacent level ossification. Zero P (Synthes, UK) cage combines the functionality of spacer and anterior plate. Radiological evaluation of subsidence of cervical spine after anterior cervical interbody fusion using Zero P cage system. Method: Retrospective review of radiographic records of patients undergoing surgery between June 2008- Oct 2009. We evaluated lateral cervical standing radiographs before, after, 6 weeks, 3, 6 months of surgery. We measured subsidence (using Total Intervertebral Height (TIH). All measurements were done using Web 1000 (Impax Agfa). Two level was treated as single segment. Subsidence > 3mm was considered significant. 20 patients (11 male: 9 female) with median age of 51 yrs (40-65) underwent one (n=10) or two level (n= 10) cervical fusion. Immediately post-op there was increase in TIH in one and two level group by 1.74mm (1.61 and 4.25mm (1.48 respectively, which at 6 months reduced to 1.05mm (0.24 (p< 0.003) and 1.32mm (1.29 (p< 0.085) at 6 months respectively. Subsidence was seen in all cases and was rapid in first 3 months and then tailed off. It was significant (> 3mm) only in 2/20 (2%) patients at 6 months. Early results indicate that spine alignment is maintained radiologically with no associated complications as screw loosening, cage extrusion etc.
To evaluate Radiological changes in the lumbosacral spine after insertion of Wallis Ligament for Foraminal Stenosis. Thirty two Levels in Twenty Six patients were followed up with standardised radiographs after insertion of Wallis Ligaments for Foraminal Stenosis. Wallis ligaments as a top-off or those with prolapsed discs were not included. The Radiological parameters compared were Anterior and Posterior Disc height, Foraminal height and width, The inter-vertebral angle (IVA), Lumbar lordosis and Scoliosis if any. The presence of slips and their progression post-op was noted, as was bony lysis if any. There were ten males with thirteen levels and sixteen females with nineteen levels in the study. Eighteen levels (56.25%) were L4/L5, ten (31.25%) were L5/S1 and 4 (12.5%)were L3/L4. The average age in the series was 59.6 years (Range 37 – 89 yrs). Average follow up was 9.5 months (Range 2 to 36). The Average increase in Anterior disc height was 1.89 mm (+/−1.39), the posterior disc height increased by an average 1.09 mm (+/−1.14). Foraminal height increased by an average 3.85 mm (+/− 2.72), while foraminal width increased by 2.14 mm (+/− 1.38). The IVA increased in 16 and reduced in 15 patients, with no change in 1. Lumbar Lordosis increased in 23 patients, with an average value of 2.3°. No patient exhibited progression in scoliosis and no lysis could be identified. There were three Grade I slips pre-op; none progressed. Foraminal dimensions and Disc height were consistently improved after Wallis insertion. Changes in IVA and Lumbar lordosis were however variable. A longer follow up is suggested to look for sustained improvement and the presence of lysis.
To assess adverse events related to XLIF approach in lumbar degenerative disease. Recently novel minimally disruptive spine procedure eXtreme lateral Interbody Fusion i.e XLIF has been developed. It is 90 (off the midline true lateral approach, which allows large graft placement, excellent disc height restoration and indirect decompression at the stenotic motion segment. We describe our experience in 28 patients. Retrospective review of records of patients undergoing surgery between July 2008- Jan 2010. Presenting complaints, number of levels performed and complications (medical, approach, or implant related) were audited. Results: 28 patients (17 female: 11 male) with median age of 47 yrs, range (38-75) formed the study group. Average stay was 4 days. All patients had MRI of lumbar spine. 2/3 rd patients had low back pain as their presenting complaint. All patients had nerve monitoring through out the procedure. There were 12 single, 15 two level and 1 three level cases (total 45 levels). 14/28 patients underwent plating at the same time. EBL was 100ml. There were 11/45 adverse events (24.4%). 6 events were approach, 4 were implant bone interface and 1 medical related. Major complication occurred in 1 patient (3.6%). 2/3 rd of patients, were better after the surgery. Almost negligible blood loss, low infection rate and short average stay seemed to work in favour of this approach. Complications are there as (with any new procedure) our results indicate, but these are manageable and less common with this technique. This did not require Ethics approval and there was no grant or industry support for the above.
