Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 615 - 615
1 Oct 2010
Delgado-Martinez A Carrascal M Meseguer G Natividad-Pedreño M Nuñez-Chia A
Full Access

Aim: Antibiotics are currently used during fracture healing for prevention or treatment of infection. Quinolones are well known to delay fracture healing, but little is known about other antibiotics. Cefazolin is the most commonly used drug for antibiotic prophylaxis, but many centres use cefuroxime. When allergy to cephalosporins is present, current recommendations include clindamicin or vancomicin. The purpose of this study is to know if other commonly used antibiotics can delay fracture healing.

Methods: 100 male 3-months-old Wistar rats were used. After anaesthesia with ketolar, a closed fracture in the middle third of the femur was carried out. Rats were divided in five groups (20 rats each): one receiving cefazolin (a first generation cephalosporin, CZ), other receiving cefuroxime (a second generation cephalosporine, CF), other vancomicin (group V), other clindamicin (group CL) and the other receiving placebo (P) for 4 weeks. Group CZ received a subcutaneous dose of 50mg/kg/daily, Group CF received a dose of 100 mg/Kg/daily, Group V received a dose of 20 mg/Kg/daily, Group CL received a dose of 25 mg/Kg/daily and group P received water. 4 weeks later rats were killed and femora extracted. A mechanical test (low speed torsion) was performed to evaluate healing. All four groups (CZ, CF, V, CL) were compared to placebo through ANOVA.

Results: Six bones were discarded because of technical errors, no infections were found. The maximum torque achieved by the calluses before breaking were 240 mNm in group P (n=18), 238 in group CZ (n=20), 178 in group CF (n=19), 167 in group V (n=19), and 205 in group CL (n=18). When compared to placebo, cefazolin and clindamicin showed no statistical differences (N.S, p> 0,10), vancomicin had lower callus strength (p=0,015), and cefuroxime had also lower callus strength near the significance level (p=0,084).

Conclusion: The mechanical strength of fracture callus is similar when rats are given cefazolin or clindamicin during fracture healing. The mechanical strength of fracture callus is lower when vancomicin (and probably cefuroxime) is given. If these results are similar to human, cefazolin and clindamicin are safe drugs to use during fracture healing. If possible, vancomicin (and perhaps cefiuroxime) use during fracture healing should be restricted.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 42 - 42
1 Mar 2009
Delgado-Martinez A Fernandez-Bisbal P Reyes-Sanchez S Obrero D
Full Access

Introduction and objectives: The most commonly used treatment for extraarticular fractures of distal radius is closed reduction and maintenance of reduction in a cast. Two types of casts are used: plaster splint for 7–10 days and later exchanged to a circular cast and the use of circular cast immediately. The objective of this work is to compare both types of treatment in terms of ability to achieve reduction and to maintain it during healing.

Methods: A prospective, randomized and blinded study was designed. To date, 21 patients enrolled the study. Informed consent was given. The inclusion criteria were: older than 35 years, extraarticular distal radius fracture sustained less than 24 hours before and not previously treated. Exclusion criteria included previous injury in the same wrist, open fracture, and not compliance with the protocol. After intrafocal anesthesia with mepivacaine 1%, fracture was reduced under traction and immobilized in a dorsal short plaster splint (splint group) or a circular short plaster cast (circular group) randomly. After 10 days of immobilization, the plaster splint was changed to a circular short plaster cast. AP and lateral X-Rays were taken before reduction, after reduction, after 10 days (before changing cast), and at 21 days. Volar inclination of lunate fossa on the lateral X-Ray was obtained. On the AP proyection, the radial inclination and radial length was measured. Complications were recorded. Data was analysed through ANOVA between groups.

Results: When comparing X-rays before and after reduction, the volar inclination of the lunate fossa on lateral projection changed from −21,4° to 8,60° (30° change) after reduction in splint group and from −15,22° to 1,78° (17° change) in circular group (p< 0.05). The other comparisons were N.S. When comparing after reduction and 10 days later, the radial inclination changed from 20,20° to 18,80° (1,40° change) in the splint group and from 20,89° to 20,44 (0,44° change) in the circular group (p< 0.05). Other comparisons were N.S. No differences were found between 10 days and 21 days in any X-Ray parameter. No complications were found.

Conclusions: A better reduction was achieved with the plaster splint method in the immediate X-Ray control. Nevertheless, reduction was better maintained during the first 10 days with the circular plaster cast method.