Aims: Bone graft substitutes have been advocated recently to avoid the potential morbidity associated with harvest of autogenous iliac crest graft. However, no commercially available graft equals autogenous bone osteo-inductive and osteoconductive qualities. We reviewed our patientsñ morbidity after harvest of 240 anterior iliac crest bone grafts for procedures involving the foot and ankle. Methods: A computerized analysis of patient records was undertaken to identify all patients under-all going a unique unicortical iliac crest bone graft harvest over a 10-year period from the senior authorñs practice. All patients were contacted either by phone or mailed questionnaire inquiring about the postoperative morbidity of the procedure. Charts were reviewed for any related complications. Results: 200 patients were available for follow-up (range 1 to 10 years). Of these patients 98% were satisþed or very satisþed with their bone graft harvest. 10 patients complained of minor residual numbness lateral to the harvest site. None complained of problems with ambulation related to graft site pain. 7% reported that their graft site pain was greater than their operative site pain during the postoperative period. 95% of patientsñ pain resolved within 4 weeks of the operative procedure. No patients incurred extra hospital days as a result of the bone graft harvest. No deep infections occurred, although there was a 6% incidence of postoperative hematoma/seroma. Conclusions: Despite common sentiment, harvesting of autogenous iliac crest bone graft yields minimal morbidity, no extra hospitalization, and optimal bone graft material at similar or lesser cost than bone graft substitutes while being overwhelmingly acceptable to patients. Bone graft substitutes may not be as cost-effective as currently thought.

Orthopedic surgeons are taught to remove the under surface of the patella in accordance with the thickness of polyethylene used to replace an equivalent amount of bone. Inability, however, to obtain a symmetrical removal of bone can lead to subluxation, increased tension producing pain, and affect range of motion. A convenient and fast way to recognise this asymmetry and remove an additional sliver of bone from the patella would be an advantage in creating a patella of even thickness.

Eight orthopedic surgeons were asked to evaluate 24 pre-cut patellar specimens with varying asymmetric thicknesses in a bag without visualisation. By feeling the patella between the thumb and forefinger, they were instructed to identify the thickest portion of the patella as well as to determine the difference in thickness between the thinnest and thickest sides. Two trials were conducted with each orthopedic surgeon consecutively.

Orthopedic surgeons were able to determine through proprioception the thickest one-half of the patella 91% of the time. This did correlate with experience in total knee arthroplasty. They were able to differentiate a 1 mm difference in patellar asymmetry 36% of the time, a 2 mm difference 61% of the time, and a 3 mm difference 81% of the time.

Orthopedic surgeons can identify an asymmetrically cut patella by assessing thickness of the patella between their thumb and forefinger the majority of the time. By doing this technique, inadvertent asymmetrically thick patellas at the time of total joint arthroplasty can be min-imised. This technique should be incorporated into the standard regimen of performing total knee arthroplasties.

Purpose: To determine if union could be achieved in peri-plafond tibial fractures by using a fibular plate with the screws brought all the way across to the medial tibial cortex.

Materials & Methods: Between September 1994 and March 2000, five patients were treated with this technique with autologous bone grafting with or without a tibial buttress plate. All of the fractures were within 2cm of the tibial plafond, thereby preventing adequate fixation with a tibial plate alone. The preoperative diagnoses included infected distal tibial nonunion (3 cases), a distal tibial nonunion (1 case), and distal tibial malunion (1 case). All had associated fibular involvement. The patients had undergone 12 prior operations. Their average age was 59 years. All patients healed without additional surgery and all were pleased with their procedure.

Conclusion: The difficulty in obtaining fixation of a periplafond tibial nonunion with fibular involvement was solved using rigid internal fixation via a fibular plate with the screws brought entirely across the tibia. All five patients achieved osseous union and stability and functionally were able to walk with minimal or no discomfort and required no ambulatory aides.