Aim:

Right-Handed Girls With Rt-Ais Measured Using Holtain Equipment Have Upper Arm Length Asymmetry (Right-Minus-Left) Which Is: 1) Relatively Longer On Scoliosis Curve Convexity; 2) Significantly Associated With Scoliosis Curve Severity (Cobb Angle And Apical Vertebral Rotation); And 3) Transient, Decreasing With Age And Years After Menarche [1,2]. The Aim Is To Test Whether The Right Upper Arm Length Relative Overgrowth And Spinal Deformity Severity Were Associated With Right Or Left Upper Arm Length Size-For-Age.

Objective

There is mounting evidence to suggest a vascular insult is responsible for Perthes' disease, and it is suggested that this may have long-term implications for the vascular health of affected individuals. This study sought to use ultrasound measures to investigate vascular structure and function in children affected by Perthes' disease.

Objective

The relationship between the index (2D) to ring finger (4D) is one of the most commonly studied anthropometric measures, which is believed to offer insight into early growth and the foetal environment. This study aimed to determine the relationship between the 2D:4D ratio and the risk of Perthes' disease in children.

Introduction

In patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), anomalous extra-spinal left-right skeletal length asymmetries in upper limbs, periapical ribs, and ilia beg the question as to whether these bilateral asymmetries are connected in some way with pathogenesis. The upper arm and iliac length asymmetries correlate significantly with adjacent spinal curve severity respectively in thoracic and lower (thoracolumbar and lumbar) spine. In lower limbs, skeletal length asymmetries and proximo-distal disproportion are unrelated to spinal curve severity. Overall, these observations raise questions about mechanisms that determine skeletal bilateral symmetry of vertebrates in health and disorder, and whether such mechanisms are involved in the cause of this disease. We investigated upper arm length (UAL) asymmetries in two groups of right-handed girls aged 11–18 years, with right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (RT-AIS, n=98) from preoperative and screening referrals (mean Cobb angle 45°) and healthy controls (n=240).

The possibility that AIS aetiology involves undetected neuromuscular dysfunction is considered likely by several workers [1,2]. Yet in the extensive neuroscience research of idiopathic scoliosis certain neurodevelopmental concepts have been neglected. These include [3]:

a CNS body schema (“body in the brain”) for posture and movement control generated during development and growth by establishing a long-lasting memory, and

During normal development the CNS has to adapt to the rapidly growing skeleton of adolescence, and in AIS to developing spinal asymmetry from whatever cause. Examination of publications relating to the CNS body schema, parietal lobe and temporo-parietal junction [4,5] led us to a new concept: namely, that a delay in maturation of the CNS body schema during adolescence with an early AIS deformity at a time of rapid spinal growth results in the CNS attempting to balance the deformity in a trunk that is larger than the information on personal space (self) already established in the brain by that time of development. It is postulated that this CNS maturational delay allows scoliosis curve progression to occur – unless the delay is temporary when curve progression would cease. The maturational delay may be primary in the brain or secondary to impaired sensory input from end-organs [6], nerve fibre tracts [2,7,8] or central processing [9,10]. The motor component of the concept could be evaluated using transcranial magnetic stimulation [11].

Conclusion: Any maturational delay of the CNS body schema could impair postural mechanisms in girls and boys with or without early AIS deformity. The “body in the brain” concept adds a particular CNS mechanism (maturational delay) to the neuro-osseous timing of maturation (NOTOM) hypothesis for the pathogenesis of AIS [12,13]. The NOTOM hypothesis states that there are more girls than boys with progressive AIS because of different developmental timing of skeletal maturation and postural maturation between the sexes in adolescence [12,13].

While previous studies have highlighted possible aetiological factors for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), research employing gait measurements have demonstrated asymmetries in the ground reaction forces, suggesting a relationship between these asymmetries, neurological dysfunction and spinal deformity. Furthermore, investigations have indicated that the kinematic differences in various body segments may be a major contributing factor. This investigation, which formed part of a wider comprehensive study, was aimed at identifying asymmetries in lower limb kinematics and pelvic and back movements during level walking in scoliotic subjects that could be related to the spinal deformity. Additionally, the study examined the time domain parameters of the various components of ground reaction force together with the centre of pressure (CoP) pattern, assessed during level walking, which could be related to the spinal deformity. Although previous studies indicate that force platforms provide good estimation of the static balance of individuals, there remains a paucity of information on dynamic balance during walking. In addition, while research has documented the use of CoP and net joint moments in gait assessment and have assessed centre of mass (CoM)–CoP distance relationships in clinical conditions, there is little information relating to the moments about CoM. Hence, one of the objectives of the present study was to assess and establish the asymmetry in the CoP pattern and moments about CoM during level walking and its relationship to spinal deformity.

The investigation employed a six camera movement analysis system and a strain gauge force platform in order to estimate time domain kinetic parameters and other kinematic parameters in the lower extremities, pelvis and back. 16 patients with varying degrees of deformity, scheduled for surgery within a week took part in the study. The data for the right and left foot was collected from separate trials of normal walking. CoP was then estimated using the force and moment components from the force platform.

Results indicate differences across the subjects depending on the laterality of the major curve. There is an evidence of a relationship between the medio-lateral direction CoP and the laterality of both the main and compensation curves. This is not evident in the anterior-posterior direction. Similar results were recorded for moments about CoM. Subjects with a higher left compensation curve had greater deviation to the left. Furthermore, the results show that the variables identified in this study can be applied to initial screening and surgical evaluation of spinal deformities such as scoliosis. Further studies are being undertaken to validate these findings.

In subjects with lumbar, thoracolumbar or pelvic tilt scoliosis no pattern of structural leg length inequality has been reported [1]. Forty-seven girls of 108 consecutive adolescent patients referred from routine scoliosis school screening during 1996–1999 had lower spinal scoliosis – lumbar (LS) 17, or thoracolumbar (TLS) 30 (mean Cobb angle 16 degrees, range 4–38 degrees, mean age 14.8 years, left curves 25). The controls were 280 normal girls (11–18 years, mean age 13.4 years). Anthropometric measurements were made of total leg lengths (LL), tibiae (TL) and feet (FL) by one observer (RGB) and asymmetries calculated for LL, TL and FL, as absolutes and percentage asymmetries of right/left lengths. There are no detectable changes of absolute asymmetries with age for LL, TL or FL in scoliotic or normal girls. Asymmetries are found in scoliotic girls compared with normals with relative lengthening on the right for each of LL (0.95%) and TL (0.99%) (each p< 0.001), but not FL (0.38%).

Conclusion: The relative lengthenings in the right leg are unrelated statistically to the severity or side of the lower spinal scoliosis; the cause is unknown and may be related to posture – free standing on the right leg [2] – to neuromuscular mechanisms, or to primary skeletal changes in growth plates of femur(s) and tibia(e).

Nachemson [2] suggested that there are more girls than boys with progressive AIS for the following reason. The maturation of postural mechanisms in the nervous system is complete about the same time in boys and girls. Girls enter their skeletal adolescent growth spurt with immature postural mechanisms. So, if they have a predisposition to develop a scoliosis curve, the spine deforms. In contrast, boys enter their adolescent growth spurt with mature postural mechanisms so they are protected from developing a scoliosis curve. We termed Nachemson’s concept the neuro-osseous timing of maturation (NOTOM) hypothesis and used it to propose a possible medical treatment for idiopathic scoliosis by delaying puberty through the pituitary using gonadorelin analogues as in idiopathic precocious puberty [3,4].

The prevalence of scoliosis is reported to be increased in rhythmic gymnasts (RGs) in Bulgaria [5] and in ballet dancers (BDs) in the USA [6]. Both groups exhibit delayed puberty, which, at first sight, nullifies the NOTOM hypothesis for idiopathic scoliosis. There are similarities between scoliotic RGs and BDs that include intensive exercise from a young age, dieting, delayed menarche, increased scoliosis prevalence (RGs 12%, BDs 24%), mild scoliosis curves (10–30 degrees), and presumably generalised joint laxity. Other differences in addition to country of origin and exercises, include certain anthropometric features and importantly in RGs, thoracolumbar and lumbar curves and, in BDs, right thoracic curves. While constitutional and environmental factors may determine the scoliosis, the different curve types in RGs and BDs suggest that the exercise pattern over many years determines which type of scoliosis develops, although not the curve severity.

Conclusion: The view that scoliotic RGs should be included in a group of sports-associated scoliosis separate from idiopathic scoliosis [5] is supported. We suggest that most BDs who develop mild-moderate scoliosis do not have idiopathic scoliosis but a scoliosis related to intensive exercises over many years acting on a particular phenotype and genotype, similar to the sports-associated scoliosis. In this context the delayed puberty of RGs and BDs with scoliosis does not nullify the NOTOM hypothesis. There is a need to focus research on such subjects who have defined constitutional and environmental factors related to their scoliosis.

The side distribution of single spinal curves in our school screening referrals for 1988–99 (n=218) suggests that the mechanism(s) determining curve laterality for the upper spine differs from those for the lower spine. We address here the laterality of right thoracic AIS. In the search to understand the aetiology of AIS some workers focus on mechanisms initiated in embryonic life including a disturbance of bilateral symmetry. The normal external bilateral symmetry of the body, highly conserved in vertebrates, results from a default process involving mesodermal somites. The normal internal asymmetry of the heart, major blood vessels, lungs and gut with its glands is also highly conserved among vertebrates. There is recent evidence that vertebrates retain an archaic asymmetric visceral organization in thoracic and abdominal organs (Cooke). In early embryonic life the visceral asymmetry develops from the breaking of the initial bilateral symmetry by a binary asymmetry switch producing asymmetric gene expression around the embryonic node and/or in the lateral plate mesoderm. In the mouse this switch occurs during gastrulation by cilia driving a leftward flow of fluid and morphogen(s) at the embryonic node (nodal flow) favouring precursors of heart, great vessels and viscera on the left. Based on the non-random laterality of thoracic AIS curves, we suggest that the binary asymmetry switch – through genetic/environmental factors extending to involve anomalously left-sided mesodermal precursors of vertebrae, ribs and/or muscles (positively or negatively), explains the distribution of right/left thoracic AIS. Some support for this hypothesis is the prevalence of scoliosis curve laterality associated with situs inversus.

Most workers consider that ribcage changes in AIS are secondary to spinal deformity. Others claim that ribs are pathogenic in curve initiation or aggravation. In 117 consecutive patients referred from school screening in 1996–99 and routinely scanned by ultrasound, 24 had thoracic and 33 thoracolumbar scolioses (right 37, left 20; mean age 14.9 years, range 12–18 years, girls 44 postmenarcheal 37, boys 13). On anteroposterior standing radiographs, Cobb angle (CA), apical vertebral rotation (AVR, Perdriolle) and apical vertebral translation (AVT from the T1-S1 line) were measured (mean & range: CA 19°, 6–42°; AVR 15°, 0–39°; AVT 17 mm, 0–38 mm). Real-time ultrasound in the prone position recorded laminal rotation (LR) and rib rotation (RR) segmentally and the spine-rib rotation difference (SRRD) as LR minus RR to estimate the combined rib deformity in the transverse plane using for thoracic curves apical LR and RR and for thoracolumbar curves T12 LR and T12 RR (mean LR 8.3°, RR 3.8°, SRRD 5.2° absolute). All deformity parameters, radiological and ultrasound, are unrelated to age. SRRD correlates significantly with each of AVR (r=0.753 p< 0.0001), Cobb angle (r=0.738 p< 0.0001), and AVT (r=0.725 p< 0.0001). Partial correlation analysis shows AVR rather than AVT is associated with the transverse plane rib deformity (SRRD/AVR controlling for AVT r=0.386 p=0.004; SRRD/AVT controlling for AVR r=0.257 p=0.058; SRRD/CA controlling for AVR r=0.260 p=0.055 and for AVT r=0.223 p=0.101). These and other findings suggest that rib rotation in thoracic curves is associated with AVR and AVT and in thoracolumbar curves more with AVR than AVT each within the 4^th column of the spine.

Several workers consider that the aetiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) involves undetected neu-romuscular dysfunction. During normal development the central nervous system (CNS) has to adapt to the rapidly growing skeleton of adolescence, and in AIS also to developing spinal asymmetry from whatever cause. A new etiologic concept is proposed after examining the following evidence:

anomalous extra-spinal left-right skeletal length asymmetries of upper arms, ribs, ilia and lower limbs suggesting that asymmetries may also involve vertebral body and costal growth plates;

The central of four requirements is maturational delay of the CNS body schema relative to skeletal maturation during the adolescent growth spurt that disturbs the normal neuro-osseous timing of maturation. With the development of an early AIS deformity at a time of rapid spinal growth the association of CNS maturational delay results in postural mechanisms failing to balance a lateral spinal deformity in an upright moving trunk that is larger than the information on personal space (self) established in the brain by that time of development. It is postulated that CNS maturational delay allows scoliosis curve progression to occur – unless the delay is temporary when curve progression would cease. The concept brings together many findings relating AIS to the nervous and musculoskeletal systems and suggests brain morphometric studies in subjects with progressive AIS.

Nachemson [2] drawing upon the theses of Sahlstrand [3] and Lidström [4] articulated the view there are more girls than boys with progressive AIS for the following reason. The maturation of postural mechanisms in the nervous system is complete about the same time in boys and girls. Girls enter their skeletal adolescent growth spurt with immature postural mechanisms – so if they have a predisposition to develop a scoliosis curve, the spine deforms. In contrast, boys enter their adolescent growth spurt with mature postural mechanisms so they are protected from developing a scoliosis curve. We term Nachemson’s concept the neuro-osseous timing of maturation (NOTOM) hypothesis [1,5] The earlier sexual and skeletal maturation of girls may have an evolutionary basis through natural selection. Curve progression in AIS is associated with acceleration of the adolescent growth spurt [6]. Postural sway involves proprioceptive, vestibular and visual input to the central nervous system. In normal children there is a significant reduction in postural sway amplitude between six to nine years and 10–14 years [7,8]. In 1071 normal children aged 6–14 years postural sway is more stable in girls from 6–9 years and over 10 years there is no sex effect [9]; all these findings fit the Nachemson concept. But in view of a subsequent report on 64 normal children aged 3–17 years showing the change with age is limited to boys [10] the age and sex effect of postural sway in healthy children needs further evaluation. In AIS children stabilometry findings are conflicting and observed greater postural sway may be secondary to the curve. In the siblings of scoliotics Lidström et al [11] concluded that postural aberration is a factor in the aetiology of AIS.

Conclusion: The NOTOM hypothesis suggests a treatment to prevent progression of late-juvenile idiopathic scoliosis, early-AIS, and some secondary scolioses. It is based on delaying the onset of the adolescent growth spurt and puberty as used therapeutically in children with idiopathic precocious puberty (IPP)[12]. The proposal is to administer a gonadorelin analogue which in the pituitary down-regulates receptors to hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) causing a fall in both luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating stimulating hormone (FSH); in turn this causes a fall in oestrogens and androgens and thereby delays or stops menarche and slows bone growth – as in girls and boys with IPP [13]. Expert paediatric opinion is supportive. King [14] has suggested the use of a gonadorelin analogue (Lupron) to delay the onset of the adolescent growth spurt in progressive AIS.

In idiopathic scoliosis the detection of extra-spinal left-right skeletal length asymmetries in the upper limbs, ribs, ilia and lower limbs [1–7] begs the question: are these asymmetries unconnected with the pathogenesis, or are they an indicator of what may also be happening in immature vertebrae of the spine? The vertebrate body plan has mirror-image bilateral symmetries (mirror symmetrical, homologous morphologies) that are highly conserved culminating in the adult form [8]. The normal human body can be viewed as containing paired skeletal structures in the axial and appendicular skeleton as a) separate left and right paired forms (e.g. long limb bones, ribs, ilia), and b) united in paired forms (e.g. vertebrae, skull, mandible). Each of these separate and united pairs are mirror-image forms – enantiomorphs. In idiopathic scoliosis, genetic and epigenetic (environmental) mechanisms [9–11] may disturb the symmetry control of enantiomorphic immature bones [12–13] and, by creating left-right endochondral growth asymmetries, cause the extra-spinal bone length asymmetries, and within one or more vertebrae create growth conflict with distortion as deformities (= unsynchronised bone growth concept) [14].

Conclusion: This enantiomorphic disorder concept applied to the axial skeleton during infancy, juvenility and adolescence – through reductionism into the molecular mechanisms of growth plate responses to different hormones at successive phases of development – provides a new theoretical insight to explain the whole body deformity of AIS. The concept suggests preventive surgery on spine and ribs.

Left-right skeletal length asymmetries in upper limbs related to curve side have been detected with adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). In school screening referrals with thoracic scoliosis we find apical vertebral rotation (AVR, Perdriolle) is associated significantly with upper arm length asymmetry. Sixty-nine of 218 consecutive adolescent patients referred routinely during 1988–1999 had idiopathic thoracic scoliosis of whom 61 had left and right upper arm lengths measured with a Holtain anthropometer (right curves 49, left curves 12, mean age 14.9 years, girls 38 postmenarcheal 34, boys 23). The controls are 278 normal girls and 281 boys (11–18 years, mean age 13.5 years). The mean value for Cobb angle is 18 degrees (range 4–42 degrees), AVR 13 (range 0–34 degrees), Cobb angle (CA) and AVR are each positively associated with upper arm length asymmetry (p=0.001 & p< 0.0001 respectively) and after correcting for each of Cobb side, apical level, sex and handedness, AVR and upper arm length asymmetry are still significantly associated (p=0.004 ANOVA). Partial correlation analysis shows AVR is associated with upper arm length asymmetry after controlling for CA (p=0.033); but not CA and upper arm length asymmetry after controlling for AVR (p=0.595). The reason why a larger AVR to the right is associated with a relatively longer right upper arm is unknown. Possibilities include neuromuscular and skeletal mechanisms, the latter relative concave overgrowth of neurocentral synchondrosis and/or of periapical ribs. We suggest consideration be given to combining convex vertebral body stapling (Betz) with concave periapical rib resection (Sevastik and Xiong) for right thoracic AIS in girls.

Objective: To establish a relationship between the scoliotic curve and the centre of gravity during level walking in patients diagnosed with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Background data: There is no established aetiology for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the reasons for the progression of the curve are still unknown. But there is an agreement regarding multifactorial nature of the aetiology among many authors. One of the interesting factors suggested is asymmetry in the ground reaction forces during walking and their relation to the deformity, indicated by gait analysis studies. Studies have also indicated that the cause and progression of the deformity in idiopathic scoliosis may be due to kinematic differences in the spine, pelvis and lower limb. If a relation could be established between the scoliotic curve and the centre of gravity, it is possible to draw some conclusions regarding the aetiology. There is no method or study till date which looked at the relation of scoliotic curve with the centre of gravity.

Materials and Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were selected. Informed consent was taken for gait analysis. 16 Markers were placed over the lower limb and force plate, using modified Helen Hays set. 5 markers were placed over the surface landmarks of selected spinous processes (C7, T6, T12, L3 and S2). Ground reaction forces and motion data were analysed, using APAS gait system and the lines of vectors were developed and correlated with the marker over the second sacral spinous process.

Results: With the help of this method we were able to establish a relationship between the scoliotic curve and centre of gravity line. These in turn were expressed in terms of changes in the moment in relation to the midline of the coronal plane. The results indicated that the changes were proportional to the severity of the scoliotic curve.

Conclusion: We present a new method of establishing the relation of scoliotic curve with the ground reaction force and the centre of gravity. Initial results obtained from this method indicate the asymmetries in the deviation of the centre of gravity line in relation to the curve, during walking. Ongoing studies based on this method, will help to understand the pathogenesis and aetiology of scoliosis on a biomechanical basis which can help in developing new treatment modalities and efficient management of these patients.

Background: In lumbar scoliosis curves of school screening referrals were evaluated (1) for the possible relation of pathomechanisms to standard and non-standard vertebral rotation (NSVR) [1], and (2) the relation between apical lumbar axial vertebral rotation and the frontal plane spinal offset angle (FPTA) [2].

Methods: Consecutive patients referred to hospital during routine school screening using the Scoliometer were examined in 1996–9. None had surgery for their scoliosis. There are 40 subjects with either pelvic tilt scoliosis (11), idiopathic lumbar scoliosis (19), or double curves (10)(girls 31, postmenarcheal 25, boys 9, mean age 15.3 years). One observer (RGB) measured: 1) in AP spinal radiographs Cobb angles (CAs), apical vertebral rotations (Perdriolle AVRs), and trigonometrically sacral alar tilt angle (SATA), and FPTA as the tilt of the T1–S1 line to the vertical; and 2) total leg lengths (tape).

Results: Excluding the double curves there are 16 left and 14 right lumbar curves mean CA 11 degrees (range 4–24 degrees), mean AVR 9 degrees (concordant to CA in 18/30, discordant in 7/30), SATA 2.8 degrees (range 0.2–7.7 degrees associated with CA side and severity, p=0.0003), and leg-length inequality 0.7 cm (significantly shorter on left, p< 0.0001 and associated with SATA (p=0.02) but not CA). Neither CA nor AVR in each of the laterality concordant and discordant lumbar or thoracic curves is significantly different. Twenty-six subjects have thoracic curves (16 right) 22 with AVR (mean CA 11 degrees, range 4–17 degrees, AVR 9 degrees, n=22) the CA being associated with each of lumbar CA and SATA (respectively p< 0.0001, p=0.003, n=26). Thoracic curve laterality of CA and AVR is concordant in 12/26 curves and discordant in 10/26 and for concordance/discordance neither is significantly different; thoracic AVR sides with laterality of lumbar curve AVR shown by thoracic AVR (but not CA) being greater in lumbar discordant than in lumbar concordant curves (14 & 7 degrees respectively, p=0.03, n=18 & 7). Both for lumbar curves alone and for lumbar with double curves, AVR by side is significantly associated with FPTA by side (r= −0.568, p=0.001, n=30; r=−0.560, p=0.0002, n=40).

Conclusion: (1) It is hypothesized that different pathomechanisms may separately affect the frontal (CA) and transverse (AVR) planes: in discordant curves these mechanisms may neutralize each other and limit curve progression; concordant curves require these biplanar mechanisms to summate and facilitate curve progression. (2) The association of frontal plane spinal tilt angle and lumbar AVR may result from balance mechanisms affecting trunk muscles – mechanisms that may underlie the complication of post-operative frontal plane spinal imbalance or decompensation [2].

Background: In preoperative thoracic (TC) and thoracolumbar (TLC) AIS curves to evaluate periapical rib-vertebra angle asymmetry [1] and rib-spinal angle asymmetry in relation to the spinal deformity and the 4th column support of the spine [2].

Methods: Consecutive preoperative AIS patients having spinal instrumentation and fusion were assessed using radiographs and ultrasonographs. Twenty-eight preoperative patients with AIS were studied (TC 19, apex T8-9 in 15, TLC 9, apex T12 in 2, L1 in 7, mean Cobb angle 51 degrees). In AP radiographs the following were measured by one observer (RGB): Cobb angle (CA), apical vertebral rotation (AVR) and apical vertebral translation (AVT) from the T1-S1 line; in TC at 6 levels about the apical vertebra (3 above, at and 2 below) for each of 1) rib-vertebral angles (RVAs) and difference (RVAD=concave minus convex RVA), 2) rib-spinal angles (RSAs) to the T1-S1 line and difference (RSAD), and 3) vertebral tilt; and in TLC the RVAs, RVADs, RSAs and RSADs of ribs 11 & 12. The ultrasound apical spine-rib rotation difference (SRRD) was obtained as a measure of transverse plane rib deformity. With the subject in a prone position and head supported, readings of laminal rotation (LR) and rib rotation (RR) were made on the back at 12 levels by one of two observers (RKA, ASK) using an Aloka SSD 500 portable ultrasound machine with a veterinary long (172mm) 3.5 MHz linear array transducer. The maximal difference between LR and RR about the curve apex was calculated as the apical spine-minus-rib rotation difference (SRRD).

Results: Thoracic curves. The RVADs (but not the RVAs, RSAs or RSADs) only at 2 & 3 levels above the apex correlate significantly with each of CA (p=0.054), AVR (p=0.047), AVT (p=0.014, after controlling for CA p=0.131) and vertebral tilt (p=0.032) but not SRRD (all two levels above apex). Thoracolumbar curves. The 11th RSAD (but not RVAD or RSAs) correlates significantly with each of AVR (r= −0.776, p=0.014, after controlling for CA p=0.022) and SRRD (r= −0.890, p=0.001, after controlling for CA p=0.003) that together correlate significantly (r=0.672, p=0.048).

Conclusion: In TC supra-apical rib asymmetry (RVAD) in sternally-stabilized [2] and longest levers of the sternal-rib complex is associated with spinal deformity; in TLC supra-apical rib asymmetry (11th RSAD) is associated with transverse plane deformity of each of the apical vertebra (mainly L1) and 12th ribs. These rib associations, probably secondary to the spinal deformity, may involve a primary rib component in the 4th spinal column. The prognostic value of supra-apical RVAD and RSAD for progressive AIS needs to be evaluated.

Introduction and Objective: Although the causation and progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remains unclear, a recent review has highlighted a series of possible aetiological factors. Additionally, research investigations have indicated that the kinematic differences in various body segments may be a major contributing factor. The value of gait analysis systems employed to measure dynamic back movements in furthering understanding of spinal deformity has also been demonstrated by various studies. Research employing gait measurements have indicated asymmetries in the ground reaction forces and have suggested relationship between these asymmetries, neurological dysfunction and spinal deformity. This investigation, which formed part of a wider comprehensive study, was aimed at identifying asymmetries in lower limb kinematics and pelvic and back movements during level walking in scoliotic subjects that could be related to the spinal deformity.

Design and Methodology: The research employed a movement analysis system and a strain gauge force platform to estimate time domain kinetic parameters and other kinematic parameters in the lower extremities, pelvis and back. 16 patients with varying degrees of deformity, scheduled for surgery within a week took part in the study.

Results and conclusions: The findings have demonstrated the presence of asymmetries in kinetic parameters in the scoliotic subject and have also served to highlight the value of using kinetic and kinematic parameters in developing the understanding of the pathogenesis and aetiology of scoliosis. In addition, the results have also indicated that the variables identified in the study can be applied to initial screening and surgical evaluation of spinal deformities such as scoliosis. Further studies are being undertaken to validate these findings.