In the setting of traumatic elbow injuries involving coronoid fractures, the relative size of the coronoid fragment has been shown to relate to the stability of the joint. Currently, the challenge lies in accurately classifying the amount of bone loss in coronoid fractures. In comminuted fractures, bone loss is difficult to measure with plain radiographs or computed tomography. The purpose of this study is to describe a novel radiographic measure, the Coronoid Opening Angle (COA), on lateral elbow radiographs. We demonstrate the relationship of the COA to coronoid height and describe how this measure can be used to estimate bone loss and potentially predict elbow instability following coronoid fracture.

Radiographs were drawn from a regional database in a consecutive fashion. Candidate radiographs were excluded on the basis of radiographic evidence of degenerative changes, previous surgery or injury, bony deformity, and inadequate lateral view of the elbow. The COA was measured as the angle between the long axis of the ulna at the level of the trochlear notch, and the tip of coronoid, from a common origin at the posterior cortex of the olecranon. Images were reviewed by a fellowship trained upper extremity surgeon, an upper extremity fellow, and a junior resident. Normal COA, coronoid height, and calculated COA at varying amounts of bone loss were calculated by three reviewers. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine how the COA can most effectively predict bone loss at varying coronoid heights. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for 39 subjects.

Seventy-two subjects were included for analysis (M=40, F=32). The normal coronoid opening angle is 33.19 degrees [32.2 – 34.2]. Coronoid height is 18.8 mm [18.1 – 19.6]. Extrapolating this baseline data, the COA at 20%, 33%, and 50% of coronoid bone loss was calculated to be 27.5, 23.5, and 18 degrees, respectively. ICC was found to be 0.90 or higher. Cutoff values were determined to maximize the sensitivity of the COA. A cutoff value of 21 degrees has a 92% sensitivity in detecting a minimum of 50% bone loss. The COA with similar sensitivity in predicting 20% and 33% bone loss are 32 and 27 degrees.

The coronoid opening angle is a novel technique that can be used on a lateral elbow radiograph to predict the minimum coronoid bone loss. This can be used to guide clinical decision making and potentially predict instability. Future research will aim to validate this tool in the clinical setting in predicting instability.

Four-Corner Fusions (4CF) and Proximal Row Carpectomies (PRC) are common procedures utilized to treat carpal pathologies and radial sided wrist pain. Usually, the range of motion (ROM) and grip strength (GS) is affected by such conditions. Literature quotes significant reduction in ROM (50–60%) and grip strength (GS) (80% of normal) with PRC and 4CF. This study aims to determine the correlation between pre-operative ROM and GS and post-operative ROM and GS for patients with wrist pain undergoing PRC or 4CF. We hypothesize that ROM between pre-operative and post-operative patients does not change, but GS improves.

Data from a prospective database of patients with wrist pain was searched to identify patients who have undergone PRC or 4CF with one year follow-up completed in the past two years. 17 such participants were identified. The diagnosis, pre-operative ROM in flexion, extension, radial deviation, ulnar deviation, pronation and supination, as well as GS at time of surgery and at six months and one year follow up were identified and assessed. The data was analysed to determine correlation between pre-and postoperative ROM and GS. The analysis was subdivided to compare patients treated with PRC versus patients with 4CF.

No significant difference between pre- and post-operative ROM was detected, except in flexion at 6 months post-operatively. The average flexion was significantly lower at 6 months (p=0.0251) compared to pre-operative levels. Average flexion pre-operatively and at 6 and 12 months was found to be 46.6 (SD=15), 34.3 (SD=13.3), 51.2 (SD=21.5) respectively. Extension was at 41.4 (SD=15.3) pre-operatively and at 33.4 (SD=12.8) and 42.1 (SD=15.5) at 6 and 12 months post-operatively. Similarly, radial and ulnar deviation averages pre-operatively and at 6 and 12 months post-operatively were found to be 11.33 (SD=5.9), 11.9 (SD=4.5), 16 (SD=8.2) [radial deviation] and 24.1 (SD=8.3), 21.4 (SD=7.3), 26 (SD=12.8) [ulnar deviation].

No significant difference was found in GS at 6 months post-operative. However, significant difference at 12 months post-operatively was observed with an average GS of 28.4 kg (SD=12.8) [p=0.0385]. Average GS pre-operatively and at 6 months was 15.8 kg (SD=9.7) and 17.3 kg (SD=8.9) respectively.

This study provides an insight on ROM and GS after PRC and 4CF. It shows that patients do not gain or lose ROM after surgery. As expected, GS improves with treatment as the pain diminishes. It is interesting to note that flexion gets worse at 6 months post-operatively before it bounces back to pre-operative levels.

Compared to single-incision distal biceps repair (SI), double-incision repair (DI) theoretically allows for reattachment of the tendon to a more anatomically favorable position. We hypothesized that DI repair would result in greater terminal supination torque compared to SI repair for acute distal biceps ruptures.

In this retrospective cohort study, patients were included if they sustained an isolated, acute (° supinated position. Secondary outcomes included supination torque in 45° supinated, neutral, and 45° pronated positions, ASES elbow score, DASH, SF-12, and VAS. Power analysis revealed that at least 32 patients were needed to detect a minimum 15% difference in the primary outcome (β = 0.20). Statistical analysis was performed with significance level α = 0.05 using R version 3.4.1 (R Core Team 2017, Vienna, Austria).

Of 53 eligible patients, 37 consented to participate. Fifteen were repaired using DI technique and 22 using SI technique. Mean age was 47.3yrs and median follow-up time was 28.1months. The groups did not differ with respect to age, time-to-follow-up, dominance of arm affected, Workers Compensation or smoking status. Mean supination torque, measured as the percentage of the unaffected side, was 60.9% (95%CI 45.1–76.7) for DI repair versus 80.4% (95%CI 69.1–91.7) for SI repair at the 60°supinated position (p=0.036). There were no statistically significant differences in mean supination torque at the 45°supinated position: 67.1% (95%CI 49.4–84.7) for DI versus 81.8% (95%CI 72.2–91.4) for SI (p=0.102), at the neutral position: 88.8% (95%CI 75.2–102.4) for DI versus 97.6% (95%CI 91.6–103.7) for SI (p=0.0.170), and at the 45°pronated position: 104.5% (95%CI 91.1–117.9) for DI versus 103.4 (95%CI 97.2–109.6) for SI (p=0.0.862). No statistically significant differences were detected in the secondary outcomes ASES Pain, ASES Function, DASH scores, SF-12 PCS or MCS, or VAS Pain. A small difference was detected in VAS Function (median 1.3 for DI repair versus 0.5 for SI repair, p=0.023). In a multivariate linear regression model controlling for arm dominance, age, and follow-up time, SI repair was associated with a greater mean supination torque than DI repair by 19.6% at the 60°supinated position (p=0.011).

Contrary to our hypothesis, we found approximately a 20% mean improvement in terminal supination torque for acute distal biceps ruptures repaired with the single-incision technique compared to the double-incision technique. Patients uniformly did well with either technique, though we contend that this finding may have clinical significance for the more discerning, high-demand patient.

Compared to single-incision distal biceps repair (SI), double-incision repair (DI) theoretically allows for reattachment of the tendon to a more anatomically favorable position. We hypothesized that DI repair would result in greater terminal supination torque compared to SI repair for acute distal biceps ruptures.

In this retrospective cohort study, patients were included if they sustained an isolated, acute (° supinated position. Secondary outcomes included supination torque in 45° supinated, neutral, and 45° pronated positions, ASES elbow score, DASH, SF-12, and VAS. Power analysis revealed that at least 32 patients were needed to detect a minimum 15% difference in the primary outcome (β = 0.20). Statistical analysis was performed with significance level α = 0.05 using R version 3.4.1 (R Core Team 2017, Vienna, Austria).

Of 53 eligible patients, 37 consented to participate. Fifteen were repaired using DI technique and 22 using SI technique. Mean age was 47.3yrs and median follow-up time was 28.1months. The groups did not differ with respect to age, time-to-follow-up, dominance of arm affected, Workers Compensation or smoking status. Mean supination torque, measured as the percentage of the unaffected side, was 60.9% (95%CI 45.1–76.7) for DI repair versus 80.4% (95%CI 69.1–91.7) for SI repair at the 60°supinated position (p=0.036). There were no statistically significant differences in mean supination torque at the 45°supinated position: 67.1% (95%CI 49.4–84.7) for DI versus 81.8% (95%CI 72.2–91.4) for SI (p=0.102), at the neutral position: 88.8% (95%CI 75.2–102.4) for DI versus 97.6% (95%CI 91.6–103.7) for SI (p=0.0.170), and at the 45°pronated position: 104.5% (95%CI 91.1–117.9) for DI versus 103.4 (95%CI 97.2–109.6) for SI (p=0.0.862). No statistically significant differences were detected in the secondary outcomes ASES Pain, ASES Function, DASH scores, SF-12 PCS or MCS, or VAS Pain. A small difference was detected in VAS Function (median 1.3 for DI repair versus 0.5 for SI repair, p=0.023). In a multivariate linear regression model controlling for arm dominance, age, and follow-up time, SI repair was associated with a greater mean supination torque than DI repair by 19.6% at the 60°supinated position (p=0.011).

Contrary to our hypothesis, we found approximately a 20% mean improvement in terminal supination torque for acute distal biceps ruptures repaired with the single-incision technique compared to the double-incision technique. Patients uniformly did well with either technique, though we contend that this finding may have clinical significance for the more discerning, high-demand patient.

Supercharged end-to-side nerve transfer for severe cubital tunnel syndrome is a recently developed technique which involves augmenting the ulnar motor branch with anterior interosseous nerve (AIN). Previous studies suggested that this technique augments or “babysits” the motor end plates until reinnervation occurs, however, some authors suggested possible reinnervation by the donor nerve. We present two cases where this transfer was done for rapid progressive (6–9 months) cubital tunnel syndrome.

The first case was a 57 year-old right hand dominant female who presented to us with severe right cubital tunnel syndrome clinically, including intrinsic wasting and claw deformity. The patient had significant loss of function and visible atrophy to her hand intrinsics over the last few months. Electrodiagnostic studies confirmed the diagnosis of severe cubital tunnel syndrome demonstrating axonal loss, positive sharp waves and fibrillations in the ulnar nerve distribution distally. The patient underwent cubital tunnel ulnar nerve release, subcutaneous anterior transposition, Guyon's canal release along with an AIN to ulnar motor nerve end-to-side transfer. Patient-based functional outcome instruments were prospectively collected with improved overall pain and function as demonstrated from a quickDASH score of 9.1 1 year post-op in comparison to a score of 34.1 pre-op. Recovery was monitored clinically and electrodiagnostic studies at 6 months and 1 year post-operatively. She demonstrated improved intrinsic muscle bulk and strength. The nerve studies at one year showed reinnervation with large amplitude motor unit potentials in the 1st dorsal interosseous and abductor digiti minimi but the 5th finger sensory response remained absent. The second case was a 58 year-old right hand dominant male diagnosed with severe and progressive right cubital tunnel syndrome. Clinically, he had significant muscle wasting and weakness and confirmed denervation on electrodiagnostic studies. He underwent the same surgical procedure as described for the first case and follow-up regimen. The patient demonstrated improved pain score and significant overall function recovery with a quickDASH score of 11.4 one year post-op in comparison to 72.7 pre-op. Nerve studies at one year confirmed our clinical impression, showing ulnar nerve reinnervation with large amplitude motor unit potentials in the 1st dorsal interosseous, while sensory response remained absent.

It is yet unclear if end-to-side nerve transfers allow reinnervation of the target muscles. Previous studies have demonstrated clinical improvement with this transfer, however we are unaware of any electrodiagnostic studies demonstrating this effect. These two cases support the notion of reinnervation after an end-to-side procedure. Further studies are needed to assess outcomes of such nerve transfers.

Purpose

The Purpose of this study was to evaluate hamstring strength after autogenous hamstring anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) reconstruction with emphasis on deeper knee flexion angles. A comparison of hamstring strength between patients undergoing ACL reconstruction using semitendinosus(ST), and those with semitendinosus and Gracilis(STG) tendons was conducted.

Purpose: The goal of laminectomy is to relieve spinal stenosis and improve radiculopathy. Back pain related to poor trunk muscular conditioning may negatively affect post-operative outcomes. A better understanding of this relationship is important to improve the selection of appropriate surgical candidates. The purpose of this study was to assess the association between cross-sectional lumbar paraspinal muscle area as measured by CT or MRI and outcomes following laminectomy.

Method: Prospective observational study of 23 patients undergoing primary elective lumbar laminectomy without fusion who were assessed with pre-operative CT scans. Clinical outcomes were measured with Numerical Pain Scale (NPS) for back and leg pain and the Oswestry Low Back Disability Index (ODI) at baseline and follow-up at a minimum of one year. Lumbar paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area was measured using digital imaging software and adjusted for percent fat infiltration; CT scans evaluations were blinded to clinical outcomes.

Results: There were significant improvements in clinical outcomes following laminectomy. ODI decreased from 53.9±11.8 (mean±standard deviation) at baseline to 27.3±20.6 after a follow-up of 15.2±3.5 months. A strong correlation existed between cross-sectional lumbar paraspinal muscle area after adjusting for infiltrating fat content an improvement in ODI (r=0.51, p< 0.02) or back pain NPS (r=0.55, p< 0.02). These relationships remained statistically significant after adjusting for age and body mass index. No significant associations were identified for improvements in leg pain NPS.

Conclusion: This study suggests a possible relationship between cross-sectional lumbar paraspinal muscle area and outcomes following laminectomy. This raises important questions regarding the role of trunk muscular conditioning in the etiology of back pain and success of surgery. Further research is required to refine this measurement as a tool to improve patient selection for surgery.