Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 148 - 148
1 Jul 2020
Couture A Davies J Chapleau J Laflamme G Sandman E Rouleau D
Full Access

Radial head fractures are relatively common, representing approximately one-third of all elbow fractures. Outcomes are generally inversely proportional to the amount of force involved in the mechanism of injury, with simple fractures doing better than more comminuted ones. However, the prognosis for these fractures may also be influenced by associated injuries and patient-related factors (age, body index mass, gender, tobacco habit, etc.) The purpose of this study is to evaluate which factors will affect range of motion and function in partial radial head fractures. The hypothesis is that conservative treatment yields better outcomes.

This retrospective comparative cohort study included 43 adult volunteers with partial radial head fracture, a minimum one-year follow up, separated into a surgical and non-surgical group. Risk factors were: associated injury, heterotopic ossification, worker's compensation, and proximal radio-ulnar joint implication. Outcomes included radiographic range of motion measurement, demographic data, and quality of life questionnaires (PREE, Q-DASH, MEPS).

Mean follow up was 3.5 years (1–7 years). Thirty patients (70%) had associated injuries with decreased elbow extension (−11°, p=0.004) and total range of motion (−14°, p=0.002) compared to the other group. Heterotopic ossification was associated with decreased elbow flexion (−9°, p=0.001) and fractures involved the proximal radio-ulnar joint in 88% of patients. Only worker's compensation was associated with worse scores. There was no difference in terms of function and outcome between patients treated nonsurgically or surgically.

We found that associated injuries, worker's compensation and the presence of heterotopic ossification were the only factors correlated with a worse prognosis in this cohort of patients. Given these results, the authors reiterate the importance of being vigilant to associated injuries.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 334 - 335
1 May 2010
Kelly P Couture A Dimeglio A
Full Access

Background: Lower limb buds appear during the second week of embryonic life and are well differentiated by the end of the 8th week. Primary ossification centres of femur and tibia appear by the end of the 8th week and by 12 weeks the cartilaginous anlage is complete. By 14 weeks primary ossification is sufficient to allow accurate ultrasonographic measurement of femoral length.

There are many established database for estimating fetal femoral length ultrasonagraphically. There is little data however on radiological measurements of fetal femoral lengths. The aim of our study was to introduce radiologically measured fetal femoral lengths in order to improve our understanding of normal fetal femoral growth.

Methods: A group of 40 post-mortem foetal radiographs ranging from 14 weeks to 39 weeks gestation were retrieved from our radiology department having excluded all cases with associated lower limb deformation. Femoral lengths were measured and plotted against gestational age. A standard growth curve was constructed and compared to the currently available data on ultrasonographic measurements. A growth velocity chart, growth remaining and an antenatal multiplier chart was also constructed.

Results: At 14 weeks the length of the femur was 14mm and the tibia 11mm. At birth the femoral diaphyseal length was 75mm and the tibia 62mm.

Using the standard growth curve there was a strong correlation between our radiological measurements and previously published ultrasonographic measurements (R2= 0.9492)

The femoral growth velocity curve demonstrated a rapid growth acceleration phase peaking at 12 cm/annum at 16 weeks, followed by a rapid deceleration phase reducing to a growth rate of 5 cm/annum at birth.

The growth remaining was calculated for each week. At 24 weeks the growth achieved is 10% thus giving a multiplying factor of 10. At birth the growth achieved is 20% giving a multiplying factor of 5.

Discussion: Modern 3D and 4D ultra-sonography has lead to an increasingly accurate detection of antenatal deformities. Antenatal orthopaedics is an advancing sub-specialty. The understanding of normal intra-uterine growth is essential knowledge of a paediatric orthopaedic surgeon when advising on antenatally detected deformities. This correlation of ultrasonographic and radiographic measurements further deepens our understanding of foetal femoral growth.