Introduction:

In April 2012 National Trauma Networks were introduced in England to optimise the management of major trauma. All patients with an ISS of ≥ 16 should be transferred to the regional Major Trauma Centre (level 1). Our hypothesis was that severe foot and ankle injuries would no longer be managed in Trauma Units (level 2).

Daycase surgery has advantages for patients, clinicians and trusts. The Best Practice Tariff uplift is £200/case for Minor Foot Procedures performed as daycases. Before discharge, Foot & Ankle daycase procedures in Cheltenham General Hospital require physiotherapy assessment and frequently an orthotic aid. This audit analysed length of stay of daycase patients on a Foot and Ankle list. The standard was 100% of daycase patients to be discharged the same day.

Length of stay for a consecutive series of patients was calculated for all daycase procedures from October to December 2010. An intervention was made comprising a weekly multidisciplinary bulletin from the Orthopaedic Consultant. This highlighted post-operative weight-bearing instructions and orthotic requirements for forthcoming daycase patients to physiotherapists, nursing staff and junior doctors. The data was compared with a second consecutive series of patients from October to December 2011.

The first series included 38 listed daycases of which 61% (23 patients) were daycase discharges. The second series comprised 41 listed daycases who received pre-operative physiotherapy assessment and provision of required orthotic aids; 85% (35 patients) of this group were discharged the same day. Data analysis using Fisher's exact test reveals this intervention had a statistically significant impact on the number of patients discharged the same day (p < 0.0207).

The financial implications are increased Best Practice Tariff with an £1800 uplift and reduction in the estimated cost of unnecessary overnight stays of £4640 over the 3 months. Improved multidisciplinary communication can significantly improve the patient experience, bed occupancy and cost of care.

Although Bohler’s & Gissane’s angles are measured in adult calcaneal fractures, it is not known if such measurements are reliable in children nor how such measurements vary with the age of the child.

The Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS) databases of 2 London Teaching Hospitals were searched and all children who had a lateral ankle xray taken as part of their attendance to the A& E department were identified. Films were excluded if there was a fracture of the calcaneus or if the film was oblique or of poor quality. Bohler’s and Gissane’s angles were measured using the image viewer software. All patients’ films were measured on two separate occasions and by two separate authors to allow calculation of inter- and intra-observer variation. Interclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were used to assess the reliability of the measurements.

347 children were identified and after exclusions, 218 films were used for the study. The overall ICC for Bohler’s angle inter-obsever error was 0.91 and for intra-observer error was 0.92, giving excellent correlation. This reliability was maintained across the age groups. Gissane’s angle inter-observer error was very poor and the intra-observer error poor across the age groups, although accuracy did improve as the patients approached maturity.

Further analysis of the Bohler’s angle showed a significant variation in the mean angle with age. Contrary to published opinion, the angle is not uniformly lower than that of adults but varies with age, peaking towards the end of the first decade before attaining adult values.

We feel that measurement of Gissane’s angle is unreliable in children but measurement of Bohler’s angle is accurate and reproducible. Bohler’s angle varies with age and knowledge of Bohler’s angle variation is important in the evaluation of os calcis fractures in children.