To evaluate functional and oncological outcomes following sacral resection Retrospective review of 97 sacral tumours referred to spinal or oncology units between 2004 and 2009.Objective
Methods
To evaluate functional and oncological outcomes following resection of sacral tumours and discuss the strategies for instrumentation. Primary malignant tumours of the sacrum are rare, arising from bony or neural elements, or bone marrow in haematological malignancies. Management of such lesions is dictated by anatomy and the behaviour of tumours. Three key issues which arise are the adequacy of tumour resection, mechanical stabilisation and the need for colostomy. Stabilisation is often extensive and can be challenging.Objective
Introduction
To review indications, complications and outcome for revision surgery in metastatic spinal disease. Retrospective review of casenotes and radiographs. 13 patients (9 male, 4 female) identified from a cohort of 222 patients who underwent surgery for spinal tumours between 1994- 2001. Indication for revision, complications, survival. Further recurrence (same or different level). Further surgery, neurological grade and pain score. Of 13 patients (4 Renal, 6 breast, 2 prostate, 1 myeloma) one is alive 101 months following revision. Two have been lost to follow up, 10 have died (mean survival 25.3 months post op). The mean time between primary and revision surgery was 10 months (range 1- 32 months) 4 disease progression (same level), 4 new level disease, 3 loss of fixation, 1 radiological collapse, 1 progressive kyphus. Approaches used: 4 anterior, 8 posterior, 1 posterior + anterior. The mean number of levels which required instrumentation on revision was 5. Modal pain score pre op 5, modal post op 3, minimum one point improvement. Preop modal Frankel grade E, postoperatively all preserved or improved one grade. Modal Karnofsky score preop 70 (30- 90), postop 80 (40-90)- all but one at least 10 point increase. Complications: 1Dural tear, 1 bacteraemia, 1 chylothorax, 1 loss of fixation. 3 patients required further surgery (range 4 months- 18 months, mean 11 months) Patients with metastatic disease may benefit from second procedures for recurrent disease whether locally or distant with excellent survival, low complications and good function.
To evaluate functional and oncological outcomes following resection of primary malignant bone tumours. Primary malignant tumours of the sacrum are rare, arising from bony or neural elements, or bone marrow in haematological malignancies. Management of these lesions is dictated by anatomical considerations and the behaviour of tumours. The three key issues which arise are the adequacy of tumour resection, mechanical stabilisation and the need for colostomy. A retrospective review of the surgical management of primary malignant sacral tumours from 2004 - 2009. The study included 46 patients (34 males, 12 females) with an average age of 49 (range 7 – 82). Median duration of symptoms before presentation was 26 months. 10 patients had inoperable tumours at presentation. 6 patients had chemotherapy. 2 patients opted for palliative radiotherapy. 1 patient was unfit for surgery. 25 patients (54%) underwent surgical resection. 8 underwent instrumented stabilisations with fibula strut graft vs. 17 uninstrumented. Colostomy was performed in 10 patients (40%). Mean follow post-operatively was 19.0 months. Wound healing problems were present in 5/25 (20%). There was no difference in infection rates between definitive surgery with and without colostomy. Mechanical failure of stabilisation was noted in 75%. There was one peri-operative death. Local recurrence occurred in 12%(3/25) of operated patients although follow-up period was noted to be short. Mechanical stabilisation for extensive lesions in the sacrum are particularly challenging in tumour surgery. Despite radiological failure in 7/8 instrumented stabilisations, patients were relatively asymptomatic and only 1/8 required revision stabilisation surgery. Ethics approval: None: Audit Interest Statement: None
Spinal Deformity Service, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK To describe the technique of nonfusion annulotomy and nuclectomy with posterior growing rod instrumentation for the treatment of non-congenital early onset scoliosis To present our results of the application of this technique in a consecutive series of nine patients with mean follow up of 76 months (range 16 to 123 months) We undertook retrospective observational casenote and radiograph study of patients with noncongenital early onset scoliosis having annulotomy and nuclectomy at the apex of their respective curves with standard posterior growing rod instrumentation between 1998 and 2009. 10 patients were identified with one excluded due to short follow up period. Of the nine patients included mean follow up was 76 months. Mean age at primary surgery was 71.7 months (range 29- 97 months) We measured pre and post operative Cobb angle, T1-S1 height change and change in height over the apical segments. Mean pre op cobb angle was 74° (range 62- 81°). Mean post op cobb angle was 38°. Three patients have completed their treatment programme with a mean number of 9 lengthenings achieved. Six patients are still undergoing lengthenings. CT demonstrates that the annulotmized segment does not fuse at a mean 3.5 years postoperatively. All patients demonstrated growth over total spinal height and also over apical segments which had undergone annultomy/ nuclectomy. We also report complications. We have demonstrated that anterior annulotomy and nuclectomy with posterior growing rod construct does allow for spinal growth over released segments without autofusion.
We conducted a prospective review of patients treated specifically for phalangeal fractures over a period of 6 months. Data was sourced from patient records, Emergency Dept records and theatre records. X-rays were reviewed by the senior authors using the AGFA IMPAX Web1000 v5.1 System. A total of 654 patients presented to our hospital during the study. Of these, 257 (39%) patients were referred to the plastics and hand surgical team on-call. Remaining 397 (61%) patients were seen and treated at the local accident and emergency. Our review identified a patient group of 75 out of 654 (11.5%) patients who required operation.
Mechanism of injury: Direct impact: n=60 (80%), Hyperextension n=11 (15%), Hyper-flexion injury n=4 (5%). Mode of injury: sports related, commonly rugby or football: 23 (31%) patients, crush injury 13 (17%), road traffic accident 10 (13%), punching either wall or a fellow human being in 10 (13%), fall 8 (11%), circular saw related injury in 8 (11%) The average patient age for a phalangeal fracture was 37.3 years. 47 (63%) patients were in the age group 20–40 years. The mean age for a phalangeal fracture in males was 35.9 (16–75) years and 42.2 (23–70) years in females. The gender distribution of these patients reveals that 58/75 (77%) patients were males. This indicates that males were at an increased relative risk of 3.4 for sustaining a hand fractures than females. The fractures were studied with respect to their complexity, digit(s) involved, phalanx and the site on the phalanx, pattern of fracture and finally the involvement of the MCP or the IP joints. Our study revealed that fifty-two (69%) of the fractures were closed while twenty-three (31%) were open. Injuries to the distal phalanges accounted for the most of the open fractures (15/23, 67%). The little finger and the ring finger were the common fingers to be involved. The fractures were treated with various standard techniques of operative fixation. Postoperatively patients were mobilised as soon as possible and fitted with a removable thermoplastic splint to allow daily active and passive exercises. Hand therapists followed unit protocol including at least one visit per week, with follow up for four to six weeks. Final review was undertaken by a clinician in a dedicated Hand clinic six weeks post fixation. Our work provides data on incidence and demographic distribution of phalangeal injuries presenting acutely to an NHS Trust covering a population area of 500,000. In our trust it is standard protocol for all such injuries to be reviewed by the Hand team to institute optimal hand therapy for patients. The study enabled us to develop a patient care pathway which will improve both patient and resource management
We report the experience of a Grade 1 Trauma Centre in treating distal femoral and tibial fractures with the Less Invasive Stabilisation System (LISS). Medium term outcomes are presented with a discussion of clinical indications. We conducted retrospective study of patients presenting to St James University Hospital with distal femoral and proximal tibial fractures. Case notes were reviewed for demographics, mode and severity of injury, clinical time to union and complications. AO fracture classification and radiological time to union were assessed. 24 patients (10 males, 14 females) underwent LISS fixation. Average age was 69.7 years (range 31–95 years). Mean injury severity score was 14 (Range 9–36). Overall, there were five patients with isolated proximal tibial fractures, seventeen with isolated femoral fractures and two with fractures of both the distal femur and proximal tibia. Two of the distal femoral fractures were open (Gustillo type IIb). According to the AO classification, the distal femoral fractures were sub-divided into 4 Type 33A fractures, 5 Type 33B fractures, 6 Type 33C fractures, 2 Type 32B fractures and 2 Type 32C fractures. The proximal tibial fractures comprised 3 Type 41-A2, 2 Type 41-C1 and 2 Type 41-C2 fractures. HSS scores for the 24 acute cases were 8 excellent, 8 good, 6 fair and 2 poor results. Average HSS score was 78.8 points. Time to union was determined clinically and radiologically. Bony union was achieved in 23 cases (95.8%). Mean time to radiological union was 3.9 months (range 2–5 months), and clinical union at a mean of 4.46 months (range 3–6 months). We illustrate that the LISS is a useful technique for treating distal femoral and proximal tibial fractures which are often a complex management problem in the elderly population. With increasing incidence of fragility fractures we suggest that this may be an underused treatment option.