Introduction: Locking plates and screws have been developed to increase stability of internal fixation in osteoporotic bone. The anatomic design should also facilitate the fracture’s reduction in complex cases.

The aim of this study was analyse the results of locking plates used for fractures of the proximal humerus and to look for specific complications.

Method: Forty four patients (mean age 60; 28 males and 16 females) were treated with a locking plate (Philos, Synthes-Sratec Medical, Switzerland) for trauma of the proximal humerus. There were fourteen 2-part (32%), ten 3-part (23%), ten valgus impacted 4-part (23%), 3 classical 4-part (7%) fractures and 7 non-unions (15%). Five patients presented an associated gleno-humeral dislocation. Patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically at a mean follow-up of 21 months (6–42). A particular attention was paid to the occurrence of specific complications.

Results: A deep infection occurred in two patients (4,5%); two others lost the reduction (4,5%), and one broke his plate (2,3%). We observed 9 cases (20,5%) of avascular necrosis. Six patients (13,6%) had an impaction of the fracture with secondary intraarticular protrusion of the locked screws, which induced a secondary glenoid wear. The impaction sometimes occurred even without any evidence of AVN. Protrusion of screws were more frequent in elderly patients or in cases of non-union. Revision surgery (18 operations) was performed in 16 patients (36%) : 9 isolated material removal; 3 revisions for loss of reduction and malposition of the plate; 2 debridement including implantation of a cement spacer with antibiotics; 4 arthroplasties (2 hemi and 2 total shoulder prostheses).

Conclusions: Proximal humerus locking plates and screws, designed to improve stability in osteoporotic bone, may have specific complications. They do not prevent fracture’s impaction, resulting in an intraarticular protrusion of the locked screws, which may induce a severe secondary wear of the glenoid. This phenomenon could be due to the direction of the forces and stresses applied on the humeral head, which is mainly parallel to the screws and not perpendicular to them. Accordingly, patients operated on with proximal humerus locking plates should be regularly controlled. In case of progressive humeral head impaction, the material should be removed before it damages the glenoid.

Background: Extracapsular fractures of proximal femur are known to have a significatively high morbidity and mortality rate at one year, and this rate is higher in case of non operative treatment. The standard gamma nail (SGN) was originally designed to provide a stable implant which allows early mobilisation and weight bearing of the elderly patients. The design of SGN however, appeared to be associated with intraoperative or postoperative femoral shaft fractures in up to 17%, requiring further surgery and compromising the outcome in these elderly patients. The trochanteric nail (TGN) was developed to overcome the problems encountered with the use of the SGN.

We report our experience in the use of the TGN in the treatment of extracapsular fractures of proximal femur. Methods: Between December 1999 and January 2001, eighty-seven consecutive patients with an extra-capsular fracture of the femur (in one case bilateral) and one patient with a proximal femoral metastasis were treated with a TGN. Nine patients died within four months of the operation and 3 were lost at follow-up. Seventy-five patients, for a total of 76 fractures were followed clinically and radiographically until the end of treatment, for a mean follow-up period of 10 months. Results: In none of 88 cases did an intraoperative shaft femur fracture occur, nor was this complication observed in the 76 femurs evaluated at follow-up. Postoperative infection was never found and union was achieved in every case. Two cases of cutting-out were reported and both were caused by incorrect placement of implant. Only nine patients (12%) required two crutches or walker at the last follow-up. Conclusion: The TGN is a promising alternative for the treatment of extracapsular fractures of the proximal femur. This implant enables the surgeon to treat most of intertrochanteric and high subtrochanteric fractures with a less invasive technique, and permits early mobilisation and unprotected weight-bearing, without the complications observed with the use of the SGN.