Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 6 - 7
1 Jan 2011
Nisar A Pendse A Bhosale A Chakrabarti I
Full Access

Osteoarthritis of the first trapeziometacarpal joint (TMCJ) is a disabling disease which reduces the function of the thumb and the hand. Replacement arthroplasty offers a pain free joint as well as mobility, stability and strength.

This study reviews the results of TMCJ arthroplasty using a cemented metal-on-polyethylene implant (Sr TMC, Avanta®). Between 2001–2005 seventy two (n = 72) TMCJ cemented Arthroplasties were performed by a single surgeon. Patients were followed in the clinics for up to six years (median follow up 36 months, range 24–72). Patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically by two independent assessors. For outcome, Sollerman and Quick-DASH scores were used. A Jamar dynamometer was used to assess the grip and pinch strengths. Thirty six patients (46 joints), were seen at final follow up. There were 13 male and 23 female patients. Ten patients had bilateral TMCJ replaced.

Six patients were revised to trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition. Four for aseptic loosening and two for traumatic dislocation. Survival after a median follow up of 36 months was 91%. At final follow up mean Quick DASH score was 29.2 and mean Sollerman Score was 77.1. Radiological review of the surviving joints showed lucencies around trapezial component in 8 joints, 4 of which were loose. However these patients had good hand function and grip strength and therefore declined revision surgery. We found that the radiological findings did not correlate with clinical findings. 83% patients were satisfied with the outcome of their treatment.

Early results of Sr-TMC (Avanta) joint replacement are encouraging. We recommend the use of this prosthesis for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 556 - 556
1 Oct 2010
Phillips H Al-Modaris F Carlino W Chakrabarti I
Full Access

Patients who sustain hip fractures should be operated on within 24 hours of admission according to the Royal College Of Physician Guidelines. A delay to theatre of more than 4 days is associated with an increase in inpatient mortality. A high proportion of patients with hip fractures are elderly and take aspirin, clopidogrel or warfarin.

A retrospective review of 100 patients admitted between December 2006 and July 2007 with a hip fracture was conducted. Our aims were to assess the proportion of patients taking antithrombotic medication, when the antithrombotic medication was stopped pre-operatively and see whether there was a delay to theatre. We also evaluated any association between patients taking antithrombotic medication and a return to theatre, post-operative morbidity and mortality and length of inpatient stay.

47 patients were taking aspirin, 1 was taking clopidogrel, 2 were on aspirin and clopidogrel and 3 patients were taking warfarin. The aspirin group had an increased delay to theatre compared to the no antithrombotic group, however, both groups had similar numbers operated on within 24 hours. 68% (32/47) patients had the aspirin stopped on the same day as the operation. 1 patient taking aspirin returned to theatre for evacuation of a haematoma. The main post-operative complication was pneumonia (n=9). 8 patients required a blood transfusion of which 5 were taking aspirin. The main causes of mortality were ischaemic heart disease (n=7) and pneumonia (n=5). The mean lengths of inpatient stay were 22.48 days in the aspirin group, 50 days in the aspirin and clopidogrel group, 66 days in the clopidogrel group, 24.33 in the warfarin group and 24.81 days in the no antithrombotic group.

It is suggested from this small study that there is no advantage in stopping aspirin prior to hip fracture surgery. However, further studies need to be undertaken.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 582 - 582
1 Oct 2010
Nisar A Chakrabarti I Pendse A Shah Z
Full Access

Background: Osteoarthritis of the first trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint is a disabling disease which reduces the function of the thumb and the hand. Replacement arthroplasty offers good range of joint motion and also maintains thumb length thus improving tip pinch grip.

Aims: This study reviews the results of TMCJ arthroplasty using a cemented metal-on-polyethylene implant (Sr TMC, Avanta®).

Methods and Results: Between 2001–2005 seventy two (n = 72) TMCJ cemented Arthroplasties were performed by a single surgeon. Patients were followed in the clinics for up to seven years (median follow up 36 months, range 24–84). Patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically by two independent assessors. For outcome, Sollerman and Quick-DASH (Disabilies of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score) scores were used. A Jamar dynamometer was used to assess the grip and pinch strengths. Thirty six patients (46 joints, n = 46), were seen at final follow up. There were 13 male and 23 female patients. Ten patients had bilateral TMCJ replaced.

Six patients were revised to trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition. Four for aseptic loosening and two for dislocation. With revision as end point the survival rate at median follow up of 36 months was 89%. At final follow up mean Quick DASH score was 29.2 and mean Sollerman Score was 77.1. Radiological review of the surviving joints showed subsidence of trapezial component in 4 joints. However these patients had good hand function and grip strength and therefore declined revision surgery. We found that the radiological findings did not correlate with clinical findings. 83% patients were satisfied with the outcome of their treatment.

Conclusion: Early results of Sr-TMC (Avanta) joint replacement are encouraging. We recommend the use of this prosthesis for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 317 - 318
1 Mar 2004
Wright J Chakrabarti I
Full Access

Aims: To compare wound closure using a subcuticular (4/0 PDS) with an interrupted (4/0 Nylon) in open carpal tunnel decompression (CTD).

Methods: 78 patients (22 bilateral) were recruited prospectively and randomised when consenting for the trial. All operations were performed by a single surgeon (JW). Patients were reviewed at 2 weeks and 3 months. Patients graded scar appearance on a four-point scale, and digital photographs were taken. Patients scored discomfort level for suture removal, on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS1–10) and a four-point categorical scale. Three consultant hand surgeons graded the digital photographs, using the same scale as the patients.

Results: Patients preferred the appearance of the subcuticular closure at 2 weeks (p=0.002); there was no statistical difference by 3 months. There was a trend towards patients þnding subcuticular suture removal less painful. Assessment of scar appearance by the consultants at 2 weeks signiþcantly favoured subcuticular closure (Cons. A: p= < 0.001, Cons. B: p=0.001, Cons. C: p=0.001); there was no signiþcant difference at 3 months. The bilateral cases preferred scar appearance following subcuticular suture (p=0.001).

Conclusions: Wound closure in open CTD using subcuticular PDS is safe. Patients and surgeons initially preferred the appearance of the subcuticular scar, when compared to closure with interrupted Nylon. Patients also experienced less pain during subcuticular PDS suture removal.