Please check your email for the verification action. You may continue to use the site and you are now logged in, but you will not be able to return to the site in future until you confirm your email address.
Introduction: This prospective review provides an update on a cohort of 150 consecutive primary TKA’s with intermediate follow-up (mean 10 years) and provides insight into the benefits of the device and casts light on the effects of polyethylene wear in posterior stabilized modular designs.
Materials: Between February 1988 and February 1990, 150 consecutive cemented Press-Fit Condylar (PFC, Johnson &
Johnson, Raynham, Massachusetts) modular total knee prostheses (118 patients) with a posterior cruciate substituting design were implanted prospectively by a single surgeon. Two independent observers employing a patient administered questionnaire and clinical and functional Knee Society scores assessed the clinical outcome. Radiographic review was performed per the Knee Society criteria. The cumulative survivorship analysis was performed in terms of best case and worst case.
Results: 20 patients (30 TKR) died and 14 patients (15 TKR −10%) were lost to follow-up. The mean duration of follow-up in this cohort of survivors was 10 years (range 8.5 – 12 years). The mean clinical and functional scores were 88 and 73 points respectively. Of the 105 TKR followed up, good to excellent results have been attained in 89.5%. 45 patients reported participation in recreational sports. The overall projected clinical and radiographic survival was 93.6% at 12 years (CI +5.9%). Revision TKA was performed in 5 knees – 2 infection, 1 instability and 2 polyethylene wear, synovitis and osteolysis. There were no cases of aseptic loosening in the absence of polyethylene wear.
Discussion: Although the 12-year survivorship results of the cemented, posterior cruciate substituting press-fit condylar modular total knee prosthesis have been successful in terms of quality of fixation, the phenomenon of ‘back-side’ polyethylene wear at the modular tibial base-plate and resultant osteolysis offset the benefits of the modularity with longer follow-up. Attention needs to be focused on the improvement of the locking mechanism or alternatives with improved newer wear-resistant polyethylene, one-piece tibial components or newer implant designs with mobile bearings such as rotating platforms with posterior substituting design.