Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 11 of 11
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_5 | Pages 75 - 75
1 Apr 2018
Calori G Mazza E Colombo A Mazzola S Romanò F Giardina F Colombo M
Full Access

INTRODUCTION

Recently the evolution of prosthesis technology allows the surgeon to replace entire limbs. These special prostheses or megaprostheses were born for the treatment of severe oncological bone loss. Recently, however, the indications and applications of these devices are expanding to other orthopaedic and trauma situations. Since some years we are implanting megaprostheses in non-oncological conditions such as septic post-traumatic failures represented by complex non-unions and critical size bone defects.

The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcome of this treatment and register all the complications and infection recurrence.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Between January 2008 and January 2016 we have treated 55 patients with septic post-traumatic bone defects In 48/55 cases we perform a 2 steps procedure: 1° step: resection, debridment, devices removal and antibiotic spacer implantation; 2° step: spacer removal and megaprosthesis implantation. In 7/55 patients in whom all the femur was infected, we performed a one step procedure by the complete removal of the femur and a megaprosthesis (Total Femur) implantation.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 62 - 62
1 May 2016
Colombo M Calori G Mazza E Mazzola S Minoli C
Full Access

Introduction

Various anti-infective agents can be added to the surface of orthopaedic implants to actively kill bacteria and prevent infection. Silver (Ag) is a commonly used agent in various anti-infective applications. Silver disrupts bacterial membranes and binds to bacterial DNA and to the sulfhydryl groups of metabolic enzymes in the bacterial electron transport chain, thus inactivating bacterial replication and key metabolic processes. Recently we are implanting Silver coated megaprosthesis for the treatment of post-traumatic septic non unions/bone defects and for infected hip or knee prosthesis revision. We treat these complications utilizing a two steps procedure: 1° step: devices removal, resection, debridment and antibiotic spacer implantation; 2° step: spacer removal and megaprosthesis implantation. This technique produce a reactive pseudosynovial membrane, well known in traumatology (Masquelet technique), following the Chamber Induction Technique principles. This chamber creates the perfect environment in which implant the prosthesis with safety. We are nowadays investigating if this membrane could optimize the Silver antimicrobical effects reducing the Silver ions dispersion and reducing toxicity on the human body.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to perform a review of the literature about Silver coated implants in Orthopaedics and Trauma and to analyze our cases treated with this implants in order to measure their efficacy and the ion dispersion in urine and blood.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 61 - 61
1 May 2016
Colombo M Calori G Mazza E Mazzola S Minoli C
Full Access

Introduction

Throughout the world the number of large joint arthroprosthetic implants continues to increase and consequently the number of septic complications with prosthesis mobilizations, periprostehtic bone loss or non-unions. The implant of large resection prosthesis (megaprosthesis) in selected patients could be a good solution both in hip and knee infected prosthesis with bone defects.

The two stage techniques with a first operation to debride, prosthesis components removal and antibiotic spacer implantation followed by a subsequent final prosthetic implant offer great results even in highly complex patients.

Objectives

The purpose of this study is to evaluate retrospectively the outcome after the implantation of megaprosthesis of the lower limbs in prosthetic infected revision.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 60 - 60
1 May 2016
Colombo M Calori G Mazza E Mazzola S Minoli C
Full Access

Introduction

In orthopaedics one of the most common complications is infection. The occurrence of a postoperative infection significantly increases the failure rate; both in the case of prosthetic and trauma surgery. Some patients despite a meticulous antiseptic procedures, a close monitoring of controls peri- and post-operative undergo the development of infection of the fixation devices with the risk of developing osteomyelitis. This risk is highly increased in the distal leg because of the known problems with blood supply and poor muscle coverage. The functionality of the affected segment is impaired, quoad fuctionem, with increased risk of amputation and sometimes with poor prognosis, quoad vitam. The therapeutic strategy proposed by our group is to treat an osteomyelitic site as a pseudo-tumor with a megaimplant following a ladder strategy driven by the NUSS classification. This work shows our experience with a developing system by Waldemar-LINK highlighting critical issues and preliminary results.

Objectives

The purpose of this study is to evaluate retrospectively the early outcome after the implantation of this megaprosthesis of the lower leg in infected post-traumatic bone defects and septic peri-device bone loss. We registered all the complications and infection recurrence.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 63 - 63
1 May 2016
Colombo M Calori G Mazza E Mazzola S Minoli C
Full Access

INTRODUCTION

The hip arthroplasty implant is currently growing up both in orthopedic and trauma practice. This increases the frequency of prosthesis revision due to implant loosening often associated with periprosthetic osteolysis that determine the failure and lead to a loss of bone substance. Nowadays there are numerous biotechnologies seeking to join or substitute the autologous or omologous bone use. These biotechnologies (mesenchymal stromal cells, growth factors and bone substitutes) may be used in such situations, however, the literature doesn't offer class 1 clinical evidences in this field of application.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a literature review using the universally validated search engines in the biomedical field: PubMed / Medline, Google Scholar, Scopus, EMBASE. The keywords used were: “Growth Factors”, “Platelet Rich Plasma”, “OP-1”, “BMP”, “BMP-2”, “BMP-7”, “Demineralized Bone Matrix”, “Stem Cell”, “Bone Marrow”, “Scaffold”, “Bone Substitutes” were crossed with “hip”, “revision”, “replacement” / “arthroplasty”, “bone loss” / “osteolysis.”


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 31 - 31
1 Jan 2016
Mazza E Calori G Colombo M Malagoli E Mazzola S
Full Access

Introduction

Our department is responsible specifically for complex cases resulting from trauma. Our experience does not want to add what has been clearly demonstrated by multicenter studies on the efficacy of rivaroxaban but aims to demonstrate how the use of this molecule was effective also in mega-prosthesis and how it has proven to be flexible and safe in dealing with difficulties and surgical complications more common in such difficult cases.

Materials and Methods

From January 2010 to date DVT prophylaxis in THR / TKR and revision was routinely performed with rivaroxaban. To date, in addition to first implant/revision in THR/TKR we treated over 30 cases of large segments replacements (large segments+mega-prosthesis) and we have not highlighted complications attributable to rivaroxaban.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 63 - 63
1 Jan 2016
Calori G Colombo M Mazza E Mazzola S Malagoli E
Full Access

Introduction

The development of new megaprosthesis for the treatment of large bone defects has offered important opportunities to orthopedic oncologic surgeons for the replacement of skeletal segments such as the long bones of the upper and lower limbs and the relative joints. Our experience, treating non union and severe bone loss, has brought us, sometimes, to be confronted with the reality of some failures after unsuccessful attempts to reconstruct. Faced with certain radiological and / or clinical drastic situations we wanted to apply the principles of Biological Chamber and oncologic surgery with megaprosthetic replacement solutions. We implanted megaprosthesis with either 1 step or 2 steps (previous antibiotated spacer) technique depending on the septic patient conditions. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate both clinical and radiological outcomes in patients underwented to a lower limb megaprosthesis implant and complications were recorded.

Materials and Methods

In total, we treated 58 patients with megaprosthesis mono-and bi-articular subdivided as follows: proximal femur, distal femur, proximal tibia and total femur. The mean follow-up of patients is about 24 months (5 yrs max, min 6 months) with clinical and serial radiographic revaluations with standard methods (X-ray in 45 days, 3–6-12-18-24 months) as well as monitoring of blood parameters of inflammation for at least 2 months


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 64 - 64
1 Jan 2016
Calori G Colombo M Mazzola S Malagoli E
Full Access

INTRODUCTION

The hip arthroplasty implant is currently growing up both in orthopedic and trauma practice. This increases the frequency of prosthesis revision due to implant loosening often associated with periprosthetic osteolysis that determine the failure and lead to a loss of bone substance.

Nowadays there are numerous biotechnologies seeking to join or substitute the autologous or omologous bone use. These biotechnologies (mesenchymal stromal cells, growth factors and bone substitutes) may be used in such situations, however, the literature doesn't offer class 1 clinical evidences in this field of application.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a literature review using the universally validated search engines in the biomedical field: PubMed / Medline, Google Scholar, Scopus, EMBASE. The keywords used were: “Growth Factors”, “Platelet Rich Plasma”, “OP-1”, “BMP”, “BMP-2”, “BMP-7”, “Demineralized Bone Matrix”, “Stem Cell”, “Bone Marrow”, “Scaffold”, “Bone Substitutes” were crossed with “hip”, “revision”, “replacement” / “arthroplasty”, “bone loss” / “osteolysis.”


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 355 - 356
1 Jul 2011
Kanakaris N Calori G Lasanianos N Verdonk R Cherubino P Blokhuis T DeBiase P Giannoudis P
Full Access

Femoral fracture non-unions are considered to be rare, and are usually treated successfully with exchange nailing. However, recalcitrant aseptic cases often require additional bone grafting. The efficacy of BMP-7 in the treatment of recalcitrant aseptic femoral non-unions was studied.

Since 2003 a multicenter registry (bmpusergroup.co.uk) was created collecting details of BMP7 application in general, between different university hospitals across Europe. Demographic data, intraoperative details, complications, clinical outcome parameters, radiological healing, VAS pain score, EuroQol-5D, and return-to-work were prospectively recorded. Radiological healing was defined as the presence of callous in two planes over 3 cortices. The minimum follow up was 12 months.

Seventeen patients, who had undergone a median of 1(1 to 4) prior revision operations, over a median period from the injury of 17 months(9 to 42), were included in this observational study. In 76.4%(13/17) the BMP7 was combined with revision of the fixation. Non-union healing was verified in 14/17 cases(82.3%) in a median period of 6.5 months(3–15). Over 80% of these patients returned to their pre-injury level of activities, the median overall health state score was 82.5(35 to 100). No adverse events or complications were associated with the BMP7 application over the median follow-up of 24 months(12–68).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 305 - 306
1 Jul 2011
Kanakaris N Calori G Lasanianos N Verdonk R Cherubino P Blokhuis T De Biase P Giannoudis P
Full Access

Purpose: Femoral fracture non-unions are considered to be rare, and are usually treated successfully with exchange nailing. However, recalcitrant aseptic cases often require additional bone grafting procedures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of BMP-7 (biological enhancement) in the treatment of recalcitrant aseptic femoral non-unions.

Material & Methods: Since 2003 a multicenter registry (bmpusergroup.co.uk) was created to collect details of BMP7 application in general, between different university hospitals across Europe. Demographic data, intraoperative details, complications, clinical outcome parameters, radiological healing, VAS pain score, EuroQol-5D, and return-to-work were prospectively recorded. Radiological healing was defined as the presence of callous in two planes over 3 cortices. The minimum follow up was 12 months.

Results: Thirty patients, who had undergone a median of 1 (1 to 5) prior revision operations, over a median period from the injury of 24 months (9 to 65), were included in this observational study. In 76.7% (23/30) the application of BMP7 was combined with a revision of the fixation. Non-union was verified in 26/30 cases (86.7%) in a median period of 6 months (range 4–10). Over 70% of these patients returned to their preinjury level of activities, the median overall health state score was 82.5 (45 to 95). No adverse events or complications were associated with the BMP7 application over the median follow-up of 30 months (12–68).

Discussion/Conclusion: This case series has verified the safety and efficacy of the use of BMP7 in a manner comparable to the scarce existing evidence on femoral non-unions. The establishment of multicenter networks and the systematic and long-term follow-up of these patients are expected to provide further information and significantly improve our understanding on this promising osteoinductive bone substitute.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 268 - 268
1 May 2009
Calori G Albisetti W Tagliabue L D’Avino M D’Imporzano M Peretti G
Full Access

Aims: The treatment of long bone non-union now days finds its gold standard in autologous bone grafting. Since this technique is affected by a high morbidity rate of the donor site, many studies tried to find valid alternatives to this procedure, but during the last few years the advances made in tissue engineering techniques opened new frontiers.

In this study BMPs/AGFs were used in posttraumatic long bone non-union and osseous defects to test their clinical and radiological effectiveness in order to find a valid alternative to autologous bone grafting.

Methods: The cases selected can be divided in two groups. Group A: Patients affected by long bones Non Union, 9 months minimum duration, who are judged not to heal by simply changing the osteosynthesis device. Group B: Patients with non neoplastic, posttrauma or post-resection osseous defects of a critical size that will probably not heal using traditional surgical techniques or for which such techniques are considered to be unsuitable.

Moreover, the overall recruitment period is 3 years during which 40 patients/year will be enrolled up to a total of 120 cases; half of these will be treated with rhBMP-7 and the other half with PRP.

Results: Only 66 patients can be evaluated as they have completed the minimum follow-up period of 9 months, 35 of whom have been treated with rhBMP-7 and 31 treated with PRP. Advanced results indicate the RX Healing rate was 85% for BMP-7 and 68% for PRP with a Clinical Healing rate of 88.5% and 68%; therefore a higher efficiency of BMP-7 over PRP was found, confirmed by a significant failure rate of 15% versus 32,3% between BMP-7 and PRP, respectively.

Conclusions: According to our results, the use of growth factors showed a similar effectiveness to autologous bone grafting with better tolerability, moreover, a relevant difference in healing/failure rate between rhBMP-7 and PRP is observed.