Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC) have the ability to home and migrate towards injured and inflamed tissues which can be useful as a minimally invasive systemic approach to deliver MSC to the site of damaged articular surface in arthritis in human and veterinary patients. From a molecular point of view, the CXCR4/SDF-1 plays an important role in this phenomenon and can be used as a target to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of culture expanded MSC. It has been demonstrated that extensive in vitro expansion down-regulates CXCR4 expression in human, murine and canine MSCs hindering their therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the effect of hypoxia and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) pre-conditioning on CXCR4 and SDF-1 expression in canine adipose derived MSC (cAT-MSC). MSC were isolated from subcutaneous adipose tissue of two adult Beagle dogs (n=2; 3–5 years old, 9–12kg) and cultured under standard conditions (5%CO₂, 37°C). Cells at passage 3 were then cultured in hypoxia (2%O₂) and normoxia, with supplementation of 1 and 5 ng/ml bFGF for 24h. MTT assay, flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry and qRT-PCR analysis were conducted to assess respectively the modulation effect on cell proliferation, CXCR4 protein expression and CXCR4 and SDF-1 gene expression. Cell proliferation increased proportionally with the increasing bFGF concentrations, with a statistically significant higher proliferative rate in normoxic conditions (p<0.05). The gene expression of CXCR4 and SDF-1 increased in hypoxic conditions with bFGF supplementation (p<0.05). bFGF supplementation increased cytoplasmatic expression of CXCR4 in hypoxic conditions (p<0.05), however the surface expression remained low in all culture conditions. The described pre-conditioning method can be used for the enhancement of the therapeutic potential of systemically administered canine AT-MSC and can have a relevant translational character for the optimization of culturing protocols of human adipose derived MSC.

Introduction. Radio-opaque additives for Orthopaedic Bone Cement, like BaSO4 or ZrO2, are now routinely used because of the valuable help in identifying cement location around an implant on the x-ray films. A new bone cement formulation was devised with the aim to improve the reparative response of bone tissue surrounding a cemented implant, soon after the operation: a 6% NaF 6% BaSO4 preparation “Fluoride Bone Cement©” (Tecres, I) was tested in-vivo versus a 9% BaSO4 preparation “CemexRX©” (Tecres, I). NaF stimulating action towards bone repair is prompt by the formation of fluoroapatite and the stimulation of osteoblast differentiation. NaF-added cement acts like a “drug-release device” for fluoride ions.

Materials & Methods. Eighteen outbred male New Zealand White rabbits of approximately 3,2 kg of weight have been used. They were divided into six groups of three units. Gropus A1, A2, A3 were implanted with cement without fluoride “CemexRX©” while groups B1, B2, B3 had “Fluoride Bone Cement©”. Retrieval occurred after 17 days (A1, B1); 33 days (A2, B2); 60 days (A3, B3). The surgical implantation site selected was the distal femural canal (meta-epiphyseal region). The canal in the right femur was filled with cement while the canal in the left femur was used as a surgical control (“sham” operation). Sections of 100 micron of thickness were taken by a rotating diamond-saw microtome (Leitz Wetzlar) and analyzed by polarized light and ultra-violet fluorescence microscopy (Nikon Miscroscope). One hundred and twenty sections were obtained for each femur.

Results. Calcein green fluorescent labelling showed that no real endosteal osteogenic response was evidenced the day after surgery, for both cement preparations, while periosteal response was normal. This was the consequence of the biological insult of the intramedullary polymerization of the cement. Xylenol orange showed that all the contra-lateral femurs (“sham”) had a normal endosteal and periosteal osteogenesis at all times. Both cement preparations continued to show a limited end-osteal response after 17 days and a slow recovery after 33 days, with better pictures in favour of NaF cement. After 60 days recovery in endosteal osteogenesis was adequate but, again, NaF cement showed the highst number of good pictures.

Conclusions. Adding NaF promoted the better recovery in endosteal osteogenic response observed in comparison with NaF-free cement. To differentiate the biological response it was essential to compare a high number of sections (120) in comparable locations, in a contralateral “sham” operated control in the very same animal. This procedure, costly and demanding, seems to be a right methodological approach.