Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the stability of the 2.4 mm palmar locking compression plate (LCP) and a new intramedullary nail-plate-hybrid Targon DR (TDR) for dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures.

Methods: An extraarticular 10 mm dorsally open wedge osteotomy was created in 8 pairs of fresh frozen distal radii to simulate an AO-A3-fracture. The fractures were stabilized with one of the fixation constructs. The specimens were loaded axially with 200 N and dorsal-excentically with 150 N. Cyclic loading with 2000 cycles as well as loading to failure were performed under axial loading.

Results: Axial loading revealed that intramedullary osteosynthesis (Targon DR: 369N/mm) was significantly (p=0.017) stiffer than plate osteosynthesis (LCP: 131 N/mm). With 214 N/mm the intramedullary nail was also more stable during dorsal excentric loading than the LCP with 51 N/mm (p=0.012). After the 2000 cycles of axial loading with 150 N the Targon group was still significant stiffer than the LCP group under both loading patterns. Neither group showed a significant change in stiffness after the 2000 cycles. The Targon DR group even showed a slight increase with 435,22 N/mm (p = 0.161), while the LCP group showed a slight decrease with 122.24 N/mm (p = 0.575) during axial loading. Under dorsal excentric loading the Targon group was still significant stiffer with 212.46 N/mm than the LCP group with 44.96 N/mm (p=0.012). The load to failure tests demonstrated again the superiority of intramedullary nailing (625N) when compared to plate osteosynthesis (403N) (p< 0.025).

Conclusions: The study shows that both implants are able to withstand physiological loads occuring under unloaded wrist motion. Neither implant showed a significant loss of stability after 2000 cycles long-term loading. Intramedullary nailing with the Targon DR of a distal A3 radial fracture is biomechanically more stable than volar fixed angle plating with the 2.4 mm LCP under axial and dorsal-excentric loads in our experimental setup.

Introduction: Radial Head Arthroplasty is considered the treatment of choice for unreconstructable radial head fractures. Short-term results in the current literatue are promising. Due to the lack of long-term results, radial head arthroplasty is looked at critically by many surgeons. In our the study we provide the 8.4 years results after treatment with the floating radial head prosthesis by Judet (Tornier, France).

Methods: In our department 19 patients were treated with bipolar radial head arthroplasty between 1997 and 2001. 11 prostheses were implantated primary and 6 secondary. The other two were implanted because of a loosening of a prior implanted prosthesis and one after resection of a vast chondrosarcoma. 12 of these patients − 10 men and 2 women – were now examined retrospectively after 101 months (78–132).

Results: 6 Patients were treated primary, 5 secondary and one was treated because of a vast chondrosarcoma. There were 5 proximal ulna fractures and 8 processus coronoideus fractures as concomitant injuries of the elbow. Following complications were seen: 2 dislocations, 2 capitellar erosions and 4 cases of heterotopic ossifications. According to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score 4 patients achieved an excellent result, 7 a good, and one a satisfactory result. The mean DASH was 13.7 (0–44). No differences were seen between primary and secondary implantation. The flexion arc was 123° (110–140°), the extension deficit was 20° (0–40°), pronation 61° (30–90°) and supination 62° (40–90°).

Conclusion: Our 8.4 years results show that radial head arthroplasty with Judet’s bipolar prosthesis leads to mostly excellent and good – subjective as well as objective – results.