Many surgeons are reluctant to use a constrained liner at the time of acetabular component revision given concerns this might result in early acetabular component loosening. We hypothesized that with appropriate initial implant stabilization of highly porous acetabular components with supplemental screw fixation, constrained liners could be safely used at the time of acetabular revision. We retrospectively identified 148 revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) where a constrained liner of one design was cemented into a newly placed highly porous acetabular component fixed with supplemental screws (mean 5 screws). Mean age at revision THA was 69 years, with 68% being female. The most common indications for revision were two-stage re-implantation (33%), recurrent dislocation (30%), and aseptic loosening (22% acetabular; 9% acetabular/femoral component). Mean follow-up was 8 years.Introduction
Methods
Obesity has previously been demonstrated to be an independent risk factor for increased complications following total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of obesity and BMI to determine whether the magnitude of the effect was similar for both procedures. We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database to identify patients who underwent primary THA or TKA between 2010 and 2014. Patients were stratified by procedure and classified as non-obese, obese, or morbidly obese according to BMI. Thirty-day rates of wound complications, deep infection, total complications, and reoperation were compared using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.Purpose
Materials & Methods
The influence of surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) on scar healing and scar perception is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients’ perception of their scar following direct anterior (DA) or posterior approach (PA) for THA utilizing validated scar assessment scales. Fifty DA and 58 PA THA patients underwent scar assessment using the Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scales (SBSES). Patients were included if they had at least 1-year follow-up, and had no previous surgery or intervention (i.e. radiation) around the assessed hip. The mean age was different between the cohorts (DA 67 vs PA 62 years, p=0.03). Other variables including gender, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, steroid use, diabetes, and smoking were similar (p>0.05 for all comparisons). All patients had subcuticular running closure, secured with skin adhesive glue. Mean time from THA to scar assessment was 3.1 and 3.6 years for the DA and PA groups, respectively (p=0.18).Introduction
Methods
