header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 450 - 451
1 Sep 2009
Penny JO Ovesen O Varmarken J Brixen K Overgaard S
Full Access

Resurfacing THA is claimed to transfer stress naturally to the femur neck and preserve proximal femoral bone mass postoperatively. DXA is an established method in estimating BMD around a standard THA, but due to the anteversion of the femur neck, rotation could affect the size of the neck-regions and thereby the BMD measurements around a RTHA. To our knowledge, this is the first study to analyze the effects of hip rotation on BMD in the femoral neck around a RTHA.

We scanned the femoral neck of 15 patients twice in each position of 15° inward, 0° and 15° outward rotation, and analyzed BMD in a single and a six-region model. CVs were calculated for BMD in the same position as well as between different positions.

For double measurements in the same position we found mean CVs of 3.1% (range 2.5% – 3.7%) and 4.6% (range 2.2% – 8.6%) in the one- and six-region models, respectively. When the 15° outward position was excluded, the CVs decreased to 2.8% and 4.0%. With rotation, the mean CVs rose to 5.4% (range 3.2%–7.2%) and 11.8% (range 2.7% – 36.3%). This effect was most pronounced in the 6-region model, predominantly in the lateral and distal parts of the femoral neck, where the change was significantly different from the fixated position. For the single-region model 15° rotation could be allowed without compromising the precision.

We conclude that rotation adversely affects the precision of BMD measurements around a RTHA, but in the single-region model smaller rotations can be allowed.

With the hip fixated the six-region model produces low CVs, acceptable for longitudinal studies. For maximal topographical detail we prefer the six-region model and recommend that future longitudinal DXA studies, including RTHA, be performed standardised, Preferably, with the hip in the neutral or internal rotation.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 90 - 90
1 Mar 2009
Damborg F Nissen N Abrahamsen B Brixen K Jørgensen H
Full Access

Introduction: Implantation of a THA changes the strain distribution pattern in the proximal femur, with a massive loss of stress in the proximal part of the femur and an increase in stress at the distal part of the femoral component.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to quantify the changes in BMD during long-term follow-up, i.e. five years, after insertion of the collarless, two-side conical, cemented Exeter stem.

Material & Methods: Eighteen patients (all women), aged 55 to 80 years, undergoing THA were included in the study after informed consent. BMD was measured in 7 regions of interest according to Gruen et al., using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry postoperatively, after 18 and 60 months of follow-up. At the same time, the contra lateral hip and spine were scanned. Results were tested using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. P values below 0.05 were considered significant.

Results: During the first 18 months, a significant decrease in BMD was present in Gruen zones 2, 3, 6, and 7. No significant changes were seen in BMD of the zones 4, and 5 in the contra lateral hip, nor at the spine. In zone 1 there was a small but significant rise in BMD.

From 18 to 60 months of follow up we observed a significant rise in BMD in all Gruen zones but zone 4 and 7. Despite this the total periprostetic BMD decreased during the study periode. There was no significant decrease in BMD in the contra lateral hip. In the spine, we observed a significant rise in BMD.

Conclusion: During short-term follow-up (i.e. 18 months) after THA, BMD decreased in Gruen zones 2, 3, 6 and 7. The bone loss is similar to findings in other implants and seems to be related to the changes in stress pattern within the proximal femur. During long-term follow-up (i.e. 5 years) BMD increased again in these zones, however, BMD remained lower than baseline.