The incidence of acetabular fractures within the UK is about 3 in 100,000 of the population per year. Since Letournel and Judet first proposed that operative reduction and rigid internal fixation of displaced fractures will likely lead to better outcome, operative management of such fractures has become standard management in major trauma centres. Long term outcome results following acetabular surgery have been reported sparingly. Two hundred and fifty-seven displaced acetabular fractures underwent an open reduction and internal fixation at St. George’s Pelvic Unit between 1992 and 1997. All surgery was performed by a single surgeon. 161 patients were followed up prospectively for a minimum of 10 years. Those lost to follow up were excluded. Anthropometric data, fracture pattern, time to surgery, associated injuries, approach, complication and outcome recorded on a database. Modified Merle D’ Auberge score was utilized as outcome measures. The mean age was 36 years (15 to 85). Road traffic accident was the commonest mechanism of injury. We observed simple fractures in 34 % and associated fractures in 66%. 52% suffered polytrauma. Average time to surgery was 11 days and anatomic reduction was achieved in 73.9%. Results were excellent 46.8 %, good 25.5 %, fair 7.5 %, and poor 19.2 %. Poor prognostic factors were increasing age, delayed surgery, poor reduction, and posterior column, transverse posterior wall and T-shaped fracture patterns. Acetabular surgery poses a major challenge to the trauma surgeon. Complications in the immediate, mid and long term are not rare. Our results compare to other series with shorter follow-up. We believe that the gold standard treatment for displaced acetabular fractures must be open reduction internal fixation performed by a dedicated pelvic surgeon at the earliest time possible. Moreover whether we are merely postponing the inevitable post-traumatic arthritis is still unknown.
1282 Primary total hip replacements were performed over the past 3 years at the Ravenscourt Park Hospital. Standardised post operative x-rays of the pelvis were archived on the Hammersmith Trust Picture Archiving and Communication System. 100 X-rays were randomly selected and reviewed by 3 independent observers (SHO, SPR, and a Consultant), and they were blinded as regards the Surgeon and their colleagues’ assessments. Surgeons who performed their procedure were excluded. Digital radiographic analysis was performed using the OrthoView system (Meridian Technique Limited, Southamptom, UK). The acetabular component was studied with respect to cup version, the angle of inclination, the quality of cement technique, and the site of cup placement. The stems were studied for cementing technique and quality, stem alignment and limb length discrepancy. A hit was declared when excellence was achieved, whilst all others were declared as a miss. Inter observer rate in declaring a hit or miss was calculated (kappa). 58% of the radiographs studied were declared a hit, and 42% a miss. All radiological reports were reviewed, and it was noted that no mention was made as regards the cup angles and the cementing quality. Each assessment took 3 minutes (1.5). The aim of this post operative radiological assessment is to introduce a tool that could be used for appraisal of Surgeons, the surgical technique and for quality control. The authors conclude that it is an easily reproducible technique, and can be performed by independent observers. These assessments will generate valuable data for research/auditing purposes, and act as an educational tool for trainees. They cautiously recommend this hit or miss approach, believing that it is a cost effective and efficient tool towards achieving better patient quality care and enhancing hip arthroplasty training skills.
