We report the radiological outcomes, and short-term clinical results, of 47 periacetabular osteotomies undertaken through both the traditional bikini incision, and a minimally invasive approach. 47 periacetabular osteotomies have been undertaken in 45 patients, by the senior author, between 2005 and 2013. There were 10 male and 35 female patients. The mean age at operation was 28.2 years. Since 2010 surgery has been performed through a 7-cm skin incision (31 hips), an incision coined as minimally invasive by Søballe et al when they described their trans-sartorial approach for acetabular surgery. Clinical data was collected prospectively; primary outcome measures included the young adult hip score and the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. Pre- and post-operative radiographs were analysed for achieved acetabular reorientation. At the time of follow-up the median young adult hip score had improved significantly from pre-operative values. Mean scores were 35.4 pre-operatively, and 64.25 post-operatively. Improvement in the anterior and lateral centre-edge angle was 32 and 32.9 degrees respectively through a traditional incision, and 27.1 and 30 degrees through the minimally invasive approach (p>0.05). No major complications occurred in any patient. Four patients complained of lateral cutaneous nerve hypoaesthesia, in two patients there was delayed union of the pubic osteotomy and in one non-union. Two patients have gone on to total hip replacement. The minimally invasive approach is safe and allows for accurate reorientation of the acetabulum whilst minimizing tissue damage. The scar is cosmetically appealing to patients, especially the predominantly female group treated with this condition. We did not see the evidence of reduced surgical stay that has been reported by other groups utilizing a minimally invasive approach. Level of evidence: II
Publication of normal and expected outcome scores is necessary to provide a benchmark for auditing purposes following arthroplasty surgery. We have used the Oxford knee score to monitor the progress of knee replacements undertaken since 1995, the start of our review programme. 4847 Oxford assessments were analysed over an 8 year follow-up period. The mean pre-operative Oxford knee score was 39.2, all post-operative reviews showed a significant improvement. Patients with a BMI >
40, and the under 50 age group showed early deterioration in outcome scores, returning to pre-operative levels by 5 and 7 years respectively. There was no significant difference in outcome between surgeons performing <
20 knee replacements a year and those performing >
100 / year. The age of the patient at the time of surgery and the pre-operative body habitus have been identified as factors affecting long term outcome of total knee replacement surgery. Awareness of these factors may assist surgeons in advising patients of their expected outcomes following surgery.
The 2 patients with the most severe contractures have undergone surgical intervention for their contracture, and 2 were managed conservatively with splinting. All 4 cases have residual problems with hand function (mean follow-up 5.5 years, range 2–11).
The overall Oxford hip score improved significantly from a mean pre-operative value of 35 to a mean post operative value of 22.9 at 3 months (p<
0.001). The mean score at 1 year increased slightly to 27.3 points but this remains lower than the pre operative average. We report no cases of osteonecrosis. One patient has since been scheduled to undergo resurfacing arthroplasty.