Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 372 - 372
1 Jul 2010
Annan JD Abu-Rajab RB Young D Bennet GC
Full Access

Introduction: Growing pains are a common complaint in school age children, but no definite organic causes have been identified. An association between musculoskeletal pain and joint laxity has been proposed. This study therefore investigates the relationship between growing pains and joint hypermobility in children.

Materials and Methods: Thirty three children with growing pains and thirty one controls of similar age and sex were recruited from outpatient clinics of a specialist paediatric hospital. Joint hypermobility was assessed in each group using the Beighton score. A Beighton score of greater than or equal to 4 out of 9 was considered hypermobile.

Results: The median Beighton scores were 6 for the study group and 0 for the control group. 93.3% of the study group had a Beighton score of equal to or greater than 4, compared to 22.6% of the control group. There was a highly significant difference in Beighton score between the two groups (P< 0.0001), with an estimated difference of 4 points 95% CI 4–6.

Discussion and Conclusion: A link between joint hyper-mobility and musculoskeletal symptoms has been demonstrated in adults. There is also some evidence that hypermobile children are more likely to experience musculoskeletal pain, particularly articular, but the extent to which joint hypermobility is related to growing pains specifically has been poorly defined. We have investigated a selective population of children with growing pains and have shown them to be significantly more hypermobile than the control children. The aetiology of growing pains remains unclear. While the growing pains will get better, in view of the possible association of joint hypermobility and other musculoskeletal complains, these children should be carefully assessed for joint laxity.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 71 - 71
1 Mar 2005
Rooney BP Bennet GC
Full Access

Introduction: To determine whether there is a correlation between severity of the slip and duration of symptoms in patients presenting with slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Methods: 50 patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis were identified from the Royal Hospital for Sick Children database from 1998 to 2003. Of these, 47 patients had casenotes and radiographs available. 12 patients had bilateral slips resulting in a total of 59 slipped capital femoral epiphyses studied. On the basis of their history, 16 of these hips were unstable and were excluded leaving 43 stable slips in 35 patients. Case-notes were reviewed and the exact age, weight, symptom duration and treatment were recorded. X-rays were assessed and the slip angle was measured by the technique described by Southwick.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 11years 9months (7yrs 5 mths – 16 yrs 5mths). There were 19 males and 16 females. Weights were plotted against age on a centile chart with 85% of patients weighing > 75th centile for age.The mean duration of symptoms was 12.1weeks (2days – 52weeks)The mean slip angle was 22° (5° – 65°)There were 34 mild slips (< 30°), 8 moderate slips (30° – 60°) and 1 severe slip (> 65°). There was no statistical difference in duration of symptoms between these groups.

Statistical analysis by ordinal regression analysis showed there was no correlation between slip severity and duration of symptoms. In addition, there was no correlation between slip severity and age or weight.

Conclusion: There appears to be no relationship between slip severity and duration of symptoms in patients presenting with stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis.