Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 38 - 38
1 Jan 2014
Gadd R Barwick T Paling E Davies M Blundell C
Full Access

Introduction:

Prompted by the success of hip and knee arthroplasty, total ankle replacement (TAR) has become increasingly popular as a treatment for end stage arthritic complaints of the ankle. Glazebrook et al proposed a three grade classification of complications to assist prediction of early implant failure. We have compared the experience of a tertiary referral centre in the UK to Glazebrook's proposed system.

Method:

A retrospective review of the Sheffield Foot and Ankle Unit TAR database was performed from 1995 to 2010. All complications were recorded and categorised using Glazebrook's proposed system. Glazebrook described eight main complications of increasing severity. Low grade complications; Post operative bone fracture, Intra-operative bone fracture and wound healing problems were very unlikely to lead to revision. Medium grade complications; technical error and subsidence, lead to failure < 50% of the time. High grade complications; deep infection, aseptic loosening and implant failure lead to revision > 50% of the time.


Purpose

To demonstrate experience of bone transport arthrodesis of the knee with simultaneous lengthening in the treatment of infected peri-articular fracture fixation associated with large condylar defects.

Methods

Four patients (3 male/1 female), mean age 46.5 years (37–57 y) with post-traumatic osteomyelitis involving the knee were treated by radical debridement, removal of all metalwork and frame application. Substantial condylar defects resulted (6–10 cm) with loss of extensor mechanism. Parenteral antibiotics were administered for several weeks. Two patients required muscle flaps. Bone transport was utilised to achieve an arthrodesis whilst simultaneously lengthening. In three cases a ‘peg in socket’ construct was fashioned to ensure stability of the arthrodesis.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 317 - 317
1 Jul 2011
Chuter G Barwick T Murray S Gerrand C
Full Access

Introduction: The workload of a bone and soft tissue tumour (BSTT) multidisciplinary team (MDT) is varied. Only a proportion of the workload attracts specific funding from the National Commissioning Group (NCG) but many patients who do not have primary malignant bone tumours are also seen and treated. We analysed the workload of our supra-regional BSTT MDT to determine the variety of conditions seen, the proportion that does not attract specific funding and the expertise required to run the service.

Methods: A prospective database was used to identify all new patients discussed at our weekly BSTT MDT meetings between 2004 and 2008 inclusively. Patients were divided by diagnosis into eight categories and further identified as to whether or not they attracted funding under NCG regulations.

Results: 1743 new patients were identified of which 83 were excluded. Of the remaining 1660, 65% were non-sarcoma and 50% were benign. 31% of the malignant workload was non-sarcoma. Only 9% of treated patients were eligible for NCG funding. Of those requiring surgery, the orthopaedic team managed 93% of benign and 77% of malignant cases; general, plastic, or thoracic surgical teams managed the remainder.

Discussion: NCG funds the management of all malignant primary bone tumours and the investigation and/or treatment of other selected conditions; the majority of our workload does not qualify. Despite fluctuations in the total workload, the ratio of benign to malignant cases remains relatively constant. An effective MDT requires expertise across many specialties.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 317 - 317
1 Jul 2011
Barwick T Chuter G Murray S Gerrand C
Full Access

Introduction: The ‘Two Week Wait’ (2ww) process has been in force since the year 2000, with the subsequent implementation of 32-day diagnosis and 62-day treatment ‘rules’ in 2005. The aims of this study were to compile a definitive diagnostic profile of 2ww referrals, establish whether a histological biopsy was required for diagnosis and consider the current 2ww impact on services in our centre.

Materials and Methods: Two hundred and nine patients were referred under 2ww to the North of England Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour service and prospectively recorded on a computerised multidisciplinary tumour database from 2006–8. The data was reviewed and verified using pathology, radiology reports and patient records.

Results: Malignancy was diagnosed in 41(20%) patients. This comprised 21 soft tissue sarcomas (10%), 11 primary bone tumours (5%), and 9 metastatic bone tumours (4%). 63 (30%) benign bone or soft tissue neoplasia and 80 (38%) non-neoplastic conditions were diagnosed. No mass lesion was identifiable in 25 patients (12%). A diagnostic or therapeutic biopsy was required in 108 (52%) patients.

Discussion and Conclusion: 15% of 2ww referrals to our centre have a primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma but over half of all 2ww patients require biopsy for diagnosis creating additional strains on resources under the 32- and 62-day rule. Emphasis is placed on obtaining a rapid diagnosis, to ease pressure on time to treatment, utilising a ‘one-stop clinic’ approach for biopsies of accessible tumours where applicable. The availability of timely radiological resources, facilitated by an MDT involving a designated coordinator (‘patient-tracker’), is key to ensure treatment is not delayed for any cancer patient regardless of referral route. Our centre is 100% compliant for waiting times for sarcoma according to the Department of Health 2008 data.