Aims

Femoroacetabular Junction Impingement (FAI) describes abnormalities in the shape of the femoral head–neck junction, or abnormalities in the orientation of the acetabulum. In the short term, FAI can give rise to pain and disability, and in the long-term it significantly increases the risk of developing osteoarthritis. The Femoroacetabular Impingement Trial (FAIT) aims to determine whether operative or non-operative intervention is more effective at improving symptoms and preventing the development and progression of osteoarthritis.

This observational study was undertaken to explore the relationship of the foot posture of patients with Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis of the knee (MCOA), patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA) and a healthy control group, using the Foot Posture Index (FPI). Goniometric measurement of talocrural dorsiflexion was also included.

The relationship of foot posture to MCOA and hip osteoarthritis OA has not been explored although in other medical fields, such as neurology and sports medicine, the relationship between foot posture, lower limb pain and function has been acknowledged. In view of the current high incidence of lower limb OA, any investigation of associations that may lead to improved assessment and conservative management is worthy of consideration.

Currently, systematic examination of the foot is not undertaken in routine clinical assessment of patients with lower limb OA and, if this were to be introduced, there would be difficulty in selecting suitable clinical outcome measures. The recent development of the Foot Posture Index (FPI) has addressed the need for a diagnostic clinical tool that measures foot posture in multiple planes and anatomical segments

Sixty participants took part: twenty patients with radiographic and clinical evidence of MCOA grade IV, twenty patients with radiographic and clinical evidence of stage IV OA hip, and twenty age-matched healthy volunteers as a control group.

A one way Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to investigate any differences between the 3 groups for foot posture using FPI scores and talocrural dorsiflexion measurements. This showed that there were significant differences between the groups (p< 0.001). Patients with MCOA had a high positive FPI score (indicating a pronated foot), patients with hip OA had a low negative FPI score (indicating a supinated foot). The healthy controls had a normal score distributed over a wider range than the other two groups. In addition, the results of the Pearsons test indicate that the FPI correlated positively with talocrural dorsiflexion (r = 0.55, p< .001).

Differences in foot characteristics may be influenced by specific treatment modalities such as gait reducation, orthotic provision, specific lower limb strengthening and stretching exercises. Foot assessment might therefore be a useful adjunct to conservative management of both MCOA and hip osteoarthritis.

Introduction: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is currently recommended for younger, active patients with high expectations but information about outcomes is limited. Reports concentrate on wear, fracture rates and radiographic appearance, rather than function. Studies that report function do not describe rehabilitation protocols. This data is important to discussions about likely outcomes and restrictions prior to consent and to fully evaluate HRA.

Methods: Consecutive Conserve HRA operations were reviewed 1 year post-surgery. Function was assessed using 3 validated questionnaires; the OHS (Oxford Hip Score), HOOS (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) and UCLA Activity Scale. Complications, pain, ROM, muscle strength, single leg stand, walking and stair climbing ability were recorded.

Results: 125 HRA were reviewed (68 right, 57 left hips) in 120 patients (71 male, 49 female) of mean age 56 years. 86.7% recorded no complications, but 20% had pain at 3 months. The median OHS was 15, median UCLA 7 (active) and mean HOOS 82.78%. Operated hip flexors, extensors and abductors were weaker (p=0.000) and hip flexion ROM a mean 94.46 ± 12.71 (55–120) degrees. For 25% walking was limited, 7.6% needed a stick and 10% a stair rail. The OHS correlated with HOOS pain subscale (r=0.812, p=0.000), flexion ROM (r=0.426, p=0.000), hip extensor (r=0.359, p=0.000) and abductor (r=0.424, p=0.000) strength. Pain at 3 months correlated with the HOOS pain subscale (p=0.000, r= 0.503).

Discussion: Although outcomes were generally good with few complications, high levels of function and activity 25% had poor outcomes; with pain, restricted hip flexion, decreased strength, limited walking and functional problems, particularly putting on socks. Pain present at 3 months was associated with pain and worse function at 1 year. It is postulated this sub-optimal recovery may be related to current rehabilitation protocols adopted from THA and not tailored to HRA.

To examine the minimal detectable change in two patient –based questionnaires for patients with shoulder instability, managed conservatively.

Oxford Instability Shoulder Score (OISS) and Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ) were administered to 93 patients (100 shoulders) attending physiotherapy. Scores were transformed to percentages to allow comparison. Questionnaires were collected at nine months with 5 subjective response categories from “much worse” to “much better”. Score changes were related to subjective response categories and data calculated to ascertain minimal detectable change (MDC) using the method of McHorney & Tarlov (1995). Proportion of scores over the minimal detectable change score were then examined.

60 patients (64 shoulders) returned questionnaires at nine months.

34 patients (38 shoulders) reported the shoulder was “much better”. The percentage change scores for these patients were significantly different to all other patients (OISS=26%, p< 0.05 and SRQ =20%, p< 0.05).

The minimal detectable change score was calculated as 14% for OISS and 10.5% for SRQ. Of the 38 ‘much better’ responses, 32 (i.e. 84%) had a change score > 14% for the OISS and 27 (i.e. 71%) > 10.5% for the SRQ. Of those 7 who responded with ‘no change or worse’, 2/7 (29%) scored > 14% for OISS and 1/7 (14.2%) scored > 10.5%

Minimal detectable change scores have been calculated for the OISS and SRQ in patients with shoulder instability. These may help determine change, which is clinically important in outcome research.