Study Design: A prospective study evaluated patients’, orthopaedists’ and not affected children of the same age ratings’ of preoperative and postoperative cosmesis in adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. The cosmetic result based on a questionnaire was compared to clinical and radiological parameters. There was no correlation between the SAQ and objective clinical and radiologic parameters at all, whereas clinical and radiological parameters showed good correlation. We recommend to standardly evaluate the cosmetic outcome as after scoliosis correction surgery.

Introduction: Improving cosmesis is an important goal in scoliosis surgery. Patients’ satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome is essential in their evaluation of the surgical result. However, only few efforts were made in the past to investigate the cosmetic outcome. We performed a a prospective study evaluated patients’, orthopaedists’ and not affected children of the same age ratings’ of preoperative and postoperative cosmesis in adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. The cosmetic result based on a standardized questionnaire (SAQ, spinal appearance questionnaire) was compared to clinical and radiological parameters.

Patient sample: Preoperative and postoperative photographs were taken from 32 patients (22 female, 10 male, average age 14.6 years) preoperatively and postoperatively in a standardized manner.

Materials: The photographs were assessed by use of a modified SAQ. In addition radiological measurements were performed like the cobb angles of the main curves in the coronal and sagittal plane, plumb line deviation, shoulder inequality and pelvic obliquity. The clinical investigation included the measurements of shoulder asymmetry, pelvic obliquity, rip and lumbar hump, plumb line deviation, breast asymmetry and the postoperative evaluation of the scar.

Results: The items general appearance, body shape, rib hump, and shoulder inequality of the SAQ improved most (p< 0.025). The patients judged the cosmetic result better than surgeons and healthy children (on average: 11 out 15 parameters of the SAQ improved) The surgeons came to the worst judgement (only 5 of 15 parameters improved). The interrater correlation of the surgeons was poor (ICC< 0.58). There was no correlation between the SAQ and objective clinical and radiologic parameters at all, whereas clinical and radiological parameters showed good correlation.

Conclusion: As shown in our results objective clinical and radiological parameters do not correlate with the evaluation of the cosmetic result. Therefore we recommend to establish the evaluation of the cosmetic outcome as standard investigation after scoliosis correction surgery.

Background: Recently, the effects of radiculopathy and nerve root blocks on driving reaction time (DRT) have been presented in the literature. To our knowledge, the relation between lumbar spinal fusion and DRT has not been studied before, although important for driving safety. So, we conducted the current study to test the hypotheses that DRT in the context of lumbar fusion is 1) altered in pre-postoperative comparison, 2) influenced by pain, 3) influenced by the patient’s driving skill and 4) different to the DRT of healthy controls.

Methods: 21 consecutive patients (age 53.5 years, SD 10.8) receiving primary lumbar fusion were tested for their DRT 1 day preoperatively (pre-op), 1 week postoperatively at the day before discharge (post-op) and at 3 months (follow-up; FU). DRT was assessed with a custom made driving simulator. Additionally, also the level of back pain was determined by VAS for usual pain (VAS-U) and for pain during testing (VAS-T). We also collected the participants’ subjective driving frequency. We used normative DRT data from 31 healthy controls of similar age for comparison with the patients.

Results: Pre-op DRT was 685 msec (Md; IQR 246), post-op DRT increased to 728 msec (Md; IQR 264) and decreased again to 671 msec (Md; IQR 202) at FU (p=0.007). Post-hoc analyses (alpha=0.017) found significant differences between post-op and FU DRT (p=0.007). Moderate to high correlations (between 0.537 and 0.680) were found between VAS of back pain and DRT (p between 0.001 and 0.012). No correlations were found between driving frequency and DRT. Controls showed a DRT of 487 msec (Md; IQR 116) which was significantly different from DRT of the patients at all three test occasions (p< 0.001).

Conclusion: We found minor increase in DRT 1 week post-op followed by a definite and significant decrease at 3 months FU. We think it is safe – with respect to DRT - to resume driving 3 months after lumbar fusion. It is difficult to draw any conclusions about the period between discharge and 3 months. We also found moderate and high correlations between DRT and the level of back pain and assume that back pain is a relevant factor influencing DRT.

Background: Clinical scores are widely used to evaluate the outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, a lack of uniformity, the use of different terminology, and the diversity of methods used to translate numerical data into clinical outcomes have been described as potential problems. Gait analysis is believed to provide more objective parameters and allow the ascertainment of functional performance after knee arthroplasty. The aim of the present study was to obtain information about the correlation between the outcome in terms of locomotion and the clinical knee score after TKA.

Methods: 29 consecutive patients waiting for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were included in the study. The Hospital for Special Surgery Score (HSS), the Knee Society Score (KSS) and a gait analysis were conducted 1 day prior to surgery and 3 months postoperatively. The following kinematic and temporospatial gait parameters, whose relevance has been established in knee arthroplasty were analyzed: In the sagittal plane, the following variables were determined: maximum knee flexion stance, maximum knee flexion swing, minimum hip flexion (= maximum hip extension) and minimum ankle dorsiflexion (= maximum ankle plantarflexion). The maximum pelvic obliquity stance was determined for analysis in the frontal plane while stride length, double support and gait velocity were calculated for temporospatial analysis. Data from the KSS and HSS were analyzed for the subgroups named pain, knee (knee-specific parameter), function and total sum. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated for the above mentioned gait parameters and for knee score subgroups pre–and postoperatively.

Results: Preoperatively, positive correlations of r > 0.5 (0.001 < p < 0.005) were ascertained for maximum knee flexion swing, maximum pelvic obliquity stance, gait velocity and stride length, and were mainly determined for the subscore of function and the total sum of KSS and HSS. A lower correlation (r = 0.388, p = 0.041) was determined for maximum knee flexion stance. Postoperatively, positive correlations of r > 0.5 (0.000 < p < 0.003) were determined for gait velocity, maximum pelvic obliquity stance and stride length, mainly for the subscore of function and the total sum of KSS and HSS. A negative correlation of r < −0.5 (0.001 < p < 0.009) between these score subgroups and double support was only ascertained postoperatively. No correlations were registered between pain subscores of KSS or HSS and any of the gait variables.

Interpretation: In the current study we established high correlations particularly between temporospatial parameters and functional and total scores of KSS and HSS pre-and postoperatively. It is concluded that the functional subscores of KSS and HSS are particularly suitable to assess the dynamic outcome of TKA.

Study Design/Objective: Prospective two-leg cohort study on anterior cervical fusion versus cervical arthroplasty with emphasis on clinical outcome measures.

Patients and Methods: Between August 2003 and May 2005 21 consecutive patients underwent anterior cervical fusion with or without anterior decompression with 26 levels fused. Between December 2004 and August 2006 24 patients had cervical arthroplasty with 30 levels replaced. The mean age at operation of the fusion group was 52 years and 5 months (46–69) and for the arthroplasty group 51 years and 2 months (42–62). To establish fusion the Cervios® cage (Synthes) with or without anterior plating was used. In the arthroplasty group the Prodisc C® disc prothesis (Synthes) was used. Contraindication for arthroplasty were osteoporosis, osteopathies, spinal canal stenosis, hypertrophic spondylarthrosis, spondylolisthesis, tumors and privious infection. Both groups were comparable with respect to age and gender, diagnosis, level distribution and preoperative clinical outcome measures (VAS for nack pain and arm pain, neck disability index and SF-36–sub-scores pain, function, vitality).

Results: Postoperatively all of the clinical outcome measures significantly improved in both groups. After three months postoperatively no significant further improvement was evident.

VAS neck pain: Fusion group/arthroplasty group: Preoperatively 6.2/5.9 n.s., 6 weeks 3.5/3.1 n.s., 12 weeks 2.1/1.9 n.s, 1 year 2/2.1 n.s.

In the fusion group we had 1 recurrent radiculopathy and 1 non union without the need of further intervention. In the arthroplasty group we faced 1 recurrent laryngeus recurrens nerve palsy and 3 spontaneus fusions within 1 year postoperatively, which might not be classified as complication.

Conclusion: Short term outcome after both procedures is excellent in terms of pain relief and function. 10% spontaneus fusion after disc replacement within the first year was evident. In our series we found better results after 3 months to 1 year postoperatively with respect to the neck disability index and SF-36 subscore pain within the arthroplasty group.

Component migration after THR is directly correlated with loosening and reported to be predictive for the long-term survival rate. In literature, four different patterns of stem-migration are reported. Likewise, periprothetic osteolytic zones indicate the risk of loosening and revision in the further course. Nevertheless, little is known about the distinguish migration behaviour between cemented and uncemented stems throughout the process of loosening. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of cementing on migration behaviour of loose femoral components after THR. A total of 207 stem-revisions have been performed at our institution between 1996 and 2001. Only patients with aseptic loosening after primary hip replacements were included in the present study. Thus, 75 patients had to be excluded due to other reasons for loosening. Migration analysis was done with the EBRA-FCA method (Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse, Femoral Component Analysis). In addition, a radiographic analysis was performed following Gruen et al. For migration analysis, a minimum of four x-rays per series are required. Hence, another 72 patients had to be excluded due to insufficient x-ray documentation. A total of 40 cemented (Group A) and 20 uncemented (Group B) femoral components could be analysed. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to age (60 years for Group A, 56 years for Group B), gender or side. Mean number of radiographs per series was 7.2 for Group A and 7.9 for Group B respectively. Mean stem survival differed between the two groups (11.3 years for Group A and 8.8 years for Group B), but without statistical significance (T-Test: p> 0.05). Differences in migration behaviour and distinct types of loosening after cemented and uncemented total hip replacement will be presented.

Aims: Nonunion still remains a major complication after skeletal trauma or elective surgery. In the last decade, extracorporeal shock wave therapy has become a common tool for treatment of nonunions and was even referred to as treatment of þrst choice for this condition. But so far, no prospective, randomised trial was conducted to show efþciency of this form of treatment. Methods: This study was performed to determine the value of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of nonunions. Previous published results in literature and own clinical results of 73 consecutive patients with nonunions, treated with extracorporeal shock waves, were analysed and confronted with natural history of union. Results: Concordant to literature, union was achieved in more than 55% of treated patients; better results were achieved for hypertrophic type of nonunion (61.8%). Mean time between shock wave therapy and bony consolidation was 5.3 months, ranging from 1 to 16.5 months. Conclusions: No study could prove efþciency of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on bone healing. Clinical studies, reporting acceleration of union after application of shock waves, rather seem to misinterpret natural history of union. No evidence is given for treatment of pseudarthroses with extracor-poreal shock waves. A randomised prospective clinical trial with control group has to be performed to take a þnal decision about this indication for extracorporeal shock wave therapy.