INTRODUCTION: Assessment of radiolucent lines (RLL) is the main component of the radiographic analysis of the glenoid component. The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic results of two glenoid preparation techniques by analyzing periglenoid radiolucencies.

MATERIEL AND METHODS: The series consists of seventy-two shoulder arthroplasties with primary osteoarthritis. Shoulders were divided into two groups based on glenoid preparation technique:

Group 1: Thirty-seven shoulders operated on between 1991 and 1995 with flat back, polyethylene glenoid implants cemented after “curettage” of the keel slot.

Group 2: Thirty-five shoulders operated on between 1997 and 1999 with flat back, polyethylene glenoid implants cemented after cancellous bone compaction of the keel slot.

At least three of the following four fluoroscopically positioned, postoperative AP radiographs were analyzed: immediate postoperative, between the 3rd and 6th postoperative months, at one year postoperative and at two years postoperative. The immediate and the two year radiograph were required for study inclusion. The radiolucent line score (RLLS) was calculated using the technique of Molé, involving the summation of radiolucencies in each of six specified zones. The RLLS was compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: On the immediate postoperative radiographs the average of the total RLL score of the 9 analyzes was 2.39 in Group 1 and 1.67 in Group 2 (p=0.042). There was a statistically significant association between the glenoid preparation technique and the incidence of radiolucency around the keel as well (p=0.001). There was no significant difference in radiolucency behind the faceplate between the two groups (Group 1: 1.54 and Group 2: 1.41; p=0.394). On the 2-year postoperative radiographs the average RLL score of the 9 analyzes were 6.44 in the Group1 (4.05 under the tray, and 2.39 around the keel), and 4.19 in Group2 (p=0.0005) (2.86 under the tray, and 1.33 around the keel). The radiolucency around the keel and behind the faceplate (p=0.0005) was significantly more important (p=0.001) in the “curettage” glenoid preparation population. A significantly higher degree of progression of the total RLL score (p=0.002) and of the radiolucency behind the faceplate (p=0.001) was observed in the “curettage” glenoid preparation group.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Preparation of the glenoid component keel slot with cancellous bone compaction is radiographically superior to the “curettage” technique with regard to periglenoid radiolucen-cies. Although new techniques of glenoid preparation may help to decrease the rate of RLL, this study shows that even with better technique, the RLL are evolutive and may appear after few years in initially perfectly implanted glenoid.

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic results of two glenoid preparation techniques by analyzing periglenoid radiolucencies.

Material and methods: The series consists of 72 shoulder arthroplasties with primary osteoarthritis. Shoulders were divided into 2 groups based on glenoid preparation technique:

Group 1: 37 shoulders operated on between 1991 and 1995 with flat back, polyethylene glenoid implants cemented after curettage of the keel slot.

Group 2: 35 shoulders operated on between 1997 and 1999 with the same glenoid implants cemented after cancellous bone compaction of the keel slot.

At least 3 of the following 4 fluoroscopically positioned, postoperative AP radiographs were analyzed: immediate postoperative, between the 3rd and 6th months, at one year and at two years postoperative. The immediate and the two year radiograph were required for study inclusion. The radiolucent line score (RLLS) was calculated using the technique of Molé, involving the summation of radiolucencies in each of six specified zones. The RLLS was compared between the two groups.

Results: On the immediate postoperative radiographs the average of the total RLL score of the 9 analyzes was 2.39 in Group 1 and 1.67 in Group 2 (p=0.042). There was a statistically significant association between the glenoid preparation technique and the incidence of radiolucency around the keel as well (p=0.001). There was no significant difference in radiolucency behind the faceplate between the two groups (Group 1: 1.54 and Group 2: 1.41; p=0.394). On the 2-year postoperative radiographs the average RLL score of the 9 analyzes were 6.44 in the Group1 (4.05 under the tray, and 2.39 around the keel), and 4.19 in Group2 (p=0.0005) (2.86 under the tray, and 1.33 around the keel). The radiolucency around the keel and behind the faceplate (p=0.0005) was significantly more important (p=0.001) in the curettage glenoid preparation population. A significantly higher degree of progression of the total RLL score (p=0.002) and of the radiolucency behind the faceplate (p=0.001) was observed in the curettage glenoid preparation group.

Discussion/conclusion: Preparation of the glenoid component keel slot with cancellous bone compaction is radiographically superior to the curettage technique with regard to periglenoid radiolucencies.

Purpose: The approach chosen for total elbow arthrolysis is crucial. It should allow access to all lesions causing joint stiffness yet avoid excessive mutilation. We report our experience with the transhumeral approach respecting the lateral structures.

Material and methods: Thirteen transhumeral elbow arthrolyses were performed from 1996 to 2002 and reviewed retrospectively at mean 18 months (6–63). Mean age at surgery was 44 years. Stiffness resulted from trauma in five patients and degenerative disease in eight. The SOFCOT classification was severe in two, moderate in ten and minimal in one. Arthroysis was performed by the posterior transtricipital technique. After releasing the fossa and the olecranon beak, the coronoid process and the anterior capsule were released using a transhumeral bone window. Two patients also underwent ulnar nerve transposition. Rehabilitation was initiated early and continued for 17 weeks on average.

Results: At last follow-up, active elbow extension improved from −39±9° to 21±9° and flexion from 109±14° to 129±7°, corresponding to an increase in motion of 38±14° (70° preoperatively and 108° postoperatively). This gain in motion was the same in the trauma and degeneration groups. Pain, evaluated with a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10 improved from 3.2±1.3 to 2.4±2.0 for posttraumatic stiffness and from 7.4±1.3 to 4.1±2.0 for degenerative stiffness. There was on postoperative irritation of the ulnar nerve which regressed partially.

Discussion: Transhumeral arthrolysis allows posterior and anterior release while preserving the lateral structures. This technique has been very effective for olecranon bone blockage, posterior and anterior capsule retraction, and for coronoid anterior block. For degenerative elbows, pain relief was achieved in 70%.

Conclusion: Transhumeral elbow arthrolysis initially proposed for the degenerative elbow can be used for posttraumatic stiffness in patients with a moderate form without limiting pronosupination nor injuring the lateral ligaments. The best indication is fracture of the humeral plate.

Aims: The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic results of two different glenoid component designs by analyzing the radiolucent lines (RLL).

Methods: Sixty-three shoulder arthroplasties with primary osteoarthritis were divided into two groups based on glenoid component type: thirty-five shoulders with flat back, and thirty-one shoulders with convex back, polyethylene glenoid implants. The radiolucenct lines were analyzed on fluoroscopically positioned, postoperative AP radiographs. The RLL Score (RLLS) was calculated using the technique of Molé. The RLLS was compared between the two groups.

Results: On the immediate postoperative radiographs the average of total RLL score was 1.67 in Group 1 and 0.98 in Group 2 (p< 0.0005). There was a statistically significant association between the type of implant and the incidence of radiolucency behind the faceplate as well (p< 0.0005). On the 2-year postoperative radiographs the average RLL score was 4.19 in the Group1 (2.86 under the tray, and 1.33 around the keel), and 3.23 in Group2 (p=0.02) (2.09 under the tray, and 1.14 around the keel). The radiolucency behind the face-plate (p< 0.0005) was significantly greater in the flat back group, but not around the keel (p=0.427). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the degree of RLL score progression.

Conclusions: The initial and mid-term RLLS is better with convex than fl at back glenoid component.

Aims: The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic results of two glenoid preparation techniques by analyzing periglenoid radiolucencies. Methods: Seventy-two shoulder arthroplasties with primary osteoarthritis were divided into two groups based on glenoid preparation technique: thirtyseven shoulders with “curettage” of the keel slot, and thirty-five shoulders with cancellous bone compaction. The radiolucent lines were analyzed on fluoroscopically positioned, postoperative AP radiographs. The RLL Score (RLLS) was calculated using the technique of Molé. The RLLS was compared between the two groups. Results: On the immediate postoperative radiographs the average of the total RLL score was 2.39 in Group 1 and 1.67 in Group 2 (p=0.042). There was a statistically significant association between the glenoid preparation technique and the incidence of radiolucency around the keel as well (p=0.001). On the 2-year postoperative radiographs the average RLL score was 6.44 in the Group1, and 4.19 in Group 2 (p=0.0005). The radiolucency around the keel and behind the face-plate (p=0.0005) was significantly greater (p=0.001) in the “curettage” glenoid preparation population. A significantly higher degree of progression of the total RLL score (p=0.002) and of the radiolucency behind the face-plate (p=0.001) was observed in the “curettage” glenoid preparation group. Conclusions: Preparation of the keel slot with cancellous bone compaction is radiographically superior to the “curettage” technique.

Purpose: The purpose of this work was to assess results of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) for rheumatoid arthritis and determine the technical difficulties.

Material and methods: Between 1993 and 1999, 32 TAA were performed for rheumatoid arthritis: 26 women and 16 men, mean age at implantation 55 years, age range 32 – 81 years, disease duration 17 years (range 2 – 35 years), long-term corticosteroid treatment 18, metotrex-ate 17. Non-cemented prostheses with a mobile insert were implanted: Buechel-Pappas (n=7), STAR (n=5), Salto (n=20). For 21 patients, subtalar and mediotarsal arthrodesis was associated with the TAA because of associated subtalar deterioration or valgus tilt due to tendiopathy of the posterior tibial tendon. All patients were seen at three, six and twelve months then every year for physical examination and x-rays. None of the patients were lost to follow-up. Mean follow-up was 57 months (range 26 – 90 months). Clinical outcome was assessed with the AOFAS.

Results: There were two failures requiring revision: one loose talar piece migrated four years after implantation requiring arthrodesis; one over-sized talar piece leading to pain had to be changed after one year with good results (AOFAS = 92). Among the other 30 patients, the mean overall score and the pain score were 82/100 (73–92) and 35/40 (20–40) respectively. Several complications were observed: wound necrosis (n=2), impaction of the talar piece (n=1), and impaction of the tibial piece (n=2) which developed at weight bearing then remained unchanged. One anterior translation of the tibial piece was asymptomatic at two years, fractures of the medial malleolus healed without difficulty.

Discussion: TAA is the treatment of choice for rheumatoid tibiotarsal degeneration. Associated lesions of the hind foot influence prognosis and results. Preoperative analysis of the deformation and loss of bone stock must be achieved with careful physical examination and appropriate x-ray or computed tomography imaging. Subtalar valgus deformation or tendinopathy of the posterior tibial tendon require an associated subtalar and mediotarsal arthrodesis.

Purpose: We studied early recovery of knee muscles after harvesting the hamstrings for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using an isokinetic testing device (Biodex®).

Material: This prospective consecutive series included 22 athletes (twelve amateur athletes and ten competition level athletes) who presented a full thickness tear of the ACL without associated lesions. Intra-articular and extra-articular ligamentoplasty using the gracilis and semi-tendinous was performed arthroscopically by the same surgeon. The same rehabilitation program was prescribed for all patients.

Method: The flexor and extensor system of both knees was assessed for each patient using the Biodex® device operating in concentric isokinetic mode. Tests were performed at two speeds 90 and 180°/s and at three times: preoperatively, and four and seven months postoperatively. The peak couple and mean power during a series of six flexion-extension movements were retained for this analysis.

Mean values remained unchanged for the three test times for the healthy knees. We therefore chose the preoperative values obtained for the healthy knee as the paired reference value for each patient. The values obtained for the operated knees were compared with these control values using two-way analysis of variance for paired variables.

Results: At four months postop, flexor and extensor muscles exhibited significant (p < 0.05) and equivalent diminution. However, 25% of the patients had already achieved 80% recovery, sufficient for renewed sports activities. At seven months postop, the extensors had totally recovered and the flexors remained significantly diminished (related to hamstring harvesting); 65% of the patients had reached 80% recovery, but 90% of the competition level athletes had recovered more than 80%. The statistical analysis demonstrated a positive correlation between muscle recovery at seven months and preoperative muscle level: the patients with higher preop levels having the higher postop levels.

Discussion: These results suggest the following: preoperative rehabilitation exercises (to start with a higher preop level), more work on the flexors (limiting factor), new recovery objectives (80% at four months, 100% at seven months). Currently, we authorise renewed sports activities on the basis of muscle recovery as assessed by isokinetic tests which are performed at four months for competition level athletes and seven months for amateur athletes.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to: 1) assess outcome of ACL reconstruction with intra- and extra-articular hamstring plasty; 2) analyse the contribution of a synthetic lateral reinforcement by comparing two series.

Material and methods: This population of 100 patients was divided into two groups: group 1 with a synthetic lateral reinforcement (70 patients) and group 2 without lateral reinforcement (30 patients). Eighty-nine percent of the patients were reviewed. Mean age at operation was 28 years. Fifty-six percent of the patients were competition-level athletes (pivot sports) and lesions of the medial meniscus was observed peroperatively in 74% of the patients. Mean follow-up was 40 months. The two groups were comparable for all parameters studied except follow-up and age which were slightly lower in group 2 without reinforcement. ARPEGE and IKDC scores (with KT1000 at 89N) were established. We performed a precise analysis of residual laxity (TELOS at 15 kg). The position and the width of the bore holes were also analysed.

Results: According to the ARPEGE scores, outcome was excellent or very good in 71% of the patients and 87% were in IKDC classes A and B. Seventy percent of the patients who were competition-level athletes (pivot sports) resumed their activities at the same level. Residual differential laxity (TELOS) was 5.7 mm (mean). Tunnel width was 3.5 mm (mean). This work demonstrated the safety of hamstring harvesting.

Discussion Residual laxity was strongly correlated with clinical outcome: residual differential laxity less than 6 mm (threshold value) ensured a negative pivot test and 94% good results. We did not find any correlation between tunnel width and residual laxity. An overly anterior femoral position and medial meniscectomy significantly increased residual laxity. The femoral bore hole should be sufficiently posterior, 60 to 70% of the anteroposterior condylar width. Use of a synthetic reinforcement did not improve clinical or laximetric outcome in the reinforcement group; a natural plasty without synthetic reinforcement would be preferable.